Mike Arthur wrote:
On Thursday 25 September 2008 17:36:52 Bill Hoffman wrote:
Please see here:
New modules added to the bug tracker are generally ignored. Patches for
existing ones are assigned to the maintainer.
It would be nice if you could send the above links and close the bug instead
r
On Thursday 25 September 2008 17:36:52 Bill Hoffman wrote:
> Please see here:
> New modules added to the bug tracker are generally ignored. Patches for
> existing ones are assigned to the maintainer.
It would be nice if you could send the above links and close the bug instead
rather than ignori
Mike Arthur wrote:
On Wednesday 24 September 2008 09:59:11 Esben Mose Hansen wrote:
Is there something I can do to move this onwards?
Personally, I think it would be beneficial to have a repository with
experimental CMake modules, from which the kitware people could move
modules into the "offic
On Wednesday 24 September 2008 09:59:11 Esben Mose Hansen wrote:
> Is there something I can do to move this onwards?
>
> Personally, I think it would be beneficial to have a repository with
> experimental CMake modules, from which the kitware people could move
> modules into the "official" build wh
On Friday 19 September 2008 21:57:18 Esben Mose Hansen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created a module for Google's protocol buffers. It works for me, but
> will of course need adjustments for various non-unix platforms.
>
> And testing :)
Is there something I can do to move this onwards?
Personally, I
Hi,
I have created a module for Google's protocol buffers. It works for me, but
will of course need adjustments for various non-unix platforms.
And testing :)
--
kind regards, Esben
# Try to find protocol buffers (protobuf)
#
# Use as FIND_PACKAGE(ProtocolBuffers)
#
# PROTOBUF_FOUND - system