Re: [Bulk] Re: [CMake] custom_command

2007-10-04 Thread Eric Noulard
2007/10/4, Dizzy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thursday 04 October 2007 17:20:54 Javier Gonzalez wrote: > > Hi again, > > > > Thanks Eric for the reply. I think what you propose doesn't work for me > > and please correct me if I'm wrong. I would like to keep the dependency > > and it seems to me that

Re: [Bulk] Re: [CMake] custom_command

2007-10-04 Thread Dizzy
On Thursday 04 October 2007 17:20:54 Javier Gonzalez wrote: > Hi again, > > Thanks Eric for the reply. I think what you propose doesn't work for me > and please correct me if I'm wrong. I would like to keep the dependency > and it seems to me that when I use CONFIGURE_FILE the file is not > genera

Re: [Bulk] Re: [CMake] custom_command

2007-10-04 Thread Javier Gonzalez
Hi again, Thanks Eric for the reply. I think what you propose doesn't work for me and please correct me if I'm wrong. I would like to keep the dependency and it seems to me that when I use CONFIGURE_FILE the file is not generated again (if I remove it, for example). I will do what you say and us