Re: [CMake] Using add_subdirectory to manage project dependencies that aren't actually in a subdirectory

; On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Joe wrote: > > Hi. I was hoping to get some guidance on if this is bad practice. I am > > simply trying to find a way to manage internal dependencies of my project > > but with a file structure that is distributed. It looks like this: > &g

[CMake] Using add_subdirectory to manage project dependencies that aren't actually in a subdirectory

Hi. I was hoping to get some guidance on if this is bad practice. I am simply trying to find a way to manage internal dependencies of my project but with a file structure that is distributed. It looks like this: /path/to/A /path/to/B B depends on A. I cannot change this directory structure.

Re: [CMake] ARGV to ARGN translation debugging

wrote: > On 11/17/2014 1:44 PM, Joe wrote: > >> >> 1) How can the same ARGV to the same function give different ARGN's? My >> feeling is that the answer is "never, it's something in how the MESSAGE >> command displays lists." >> 2

[CMake] ARGV to ARGN translation debugging

Hey all, I know that ARGV is all arguments, and ARGN is all arguments past the last expected argument. I find myself in a weird situation with these, where identical ARGV's in the same function lead to different ARGN's. The relevant code in the CMake script is below FUNCTION(MY_FUNC_NAME EXE_NAME

Re: [CMake] Debuginfo builds and CPack RPM support

> CPACK_RPM_DEBUGINFO which would trigger the feature. > > Is the debuginfo generation distribution-specific or is it the same > for Fedora, Mandriva, OpenSuSE or any other RPM-based distro? I verified that the RPM macros exist on CentOS, Fedora, Ubuntu (with RPM tools), and Mandriva. J

[CMake] Debuginfo builds and CPack RPM support

lays nice with CPack? Or is there an alternate way to generate debuginfo packages for RPM platforms within the confines of CMake/CPack? joe -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic

Re: [CMake] fixup_bundle() doesn't like libglut.3.dylib

ture, I'll probably need to build the program separately in 10.7 in order to run it in 10.7. And thanks David, your posts have been very helpful. Best, Joe On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Michael Jackson wrote: > It seems that this library is ONLY installed with Xcode which leads me

Re: [CMake] fixup_bundle() doesn't like libglut.3.dylib

well. The solution I see so far is to copy the .dylib into Lion. -Joe On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Michael Jackson wrote: > You have a bad install of Lion (OS X 10.7.x). I just checked 3 different Lion > machines and ALL have OpenCL.framework installed. So I would suspect your > Lion

Re: [CMake] fixup_bundle() doesn't like libglut.3.dylib

ly copy the framework into the bundle > rather than selectively copying just the framework library and its > "Resources" folder. > > I am very hesitant to recommend copying a "/System" framework into a bundle > without knowing more details about where that framework c

Re: [CMake] fixup_bundle() doesn't like libglut.3.dylib

o "other". Just add another chunk inside your override function that > looks like this: > >      if(resolved_file MATCHES > "^/System/Library/Frameworks/OpenCL.framework") >        message("resolving ${resolved_file} as other") >        set(${type_

Re: [CMake] fixup_bundle() doesn't like libglut.3.dylib

GetPrerequisites.cmake but didn't get any clue how to do that. Thanks, Joe On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:47 PM, David Cole wrote: > Rather than just doing a "fixup_bundle" as an INSTALL(CODE snippet, put it > in a separate CMake script, and use install(SCRIPT to execute it. You can > c

Re: [CMake] fixup_bundle() doesn't like libglut.3.dylib

Thanks, this is exactly what I need. Just one question. Why the function gp_resolved_file_type_override() cannot be seen if it is implemented in my project's CMakeLists.txt? I have to add it in GetPrerequisite.cmake module, but that's not good. Thanks, Joe On Mon, May 7, 2012 a

[CMake] fixup_bundle() doesn't like libglut.3.dylib

xup_bundle() to fix dependencies for architecture ppc7400, but the error remains. Any idea how to get around this? Thanks, Joe -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check t

Re: [CMake] TCL modules

list. On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Michael Hertling wrote: > On 11/17/2011 05:53 PM, Joe Brandt wrote: > > I totally agree with your #2. I was thinking that it would be easier to > > try and update the existing ones, rather than create new ones, at least > > from the p

Re: [CMake] TCL modules

at 6:27 AM, Michael Hertling wrote: > On 11/17/2011 12:28 AM, Joe Brandt wrote: > > I have a couple issues, that I'd like to help fix, with the current > > FindTCL.cmake, FindTclsh.cmake, FindWish.cmake, and FindTclStub.cmake > that > > make them unusable for me. Th

[CMake] TCL modules

r, can get incorporated back upstream. Joe -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubsc

[CMake] Test if found library is 32 or 64 bit

Hi, I've got a seemingly simple question. However, I failed to find an answer up to now. In my FindXXX module, I search a library with help of the find_library command on a 64-bit Linux. Now, I want to check, if the library is 32-bit (built with -m32) or 64-bit. How can I check this? Thanks

[CMake] Remove custom targets

Hi all! I have a project, which pulls in a bunch of sub-projects, using add_subdirectory. The problem is that these projects all create a custom target called uninstall. Obviously, when these projects are pulled together, the uninstall targets clash. An ideal solution would be to ignore the unins

Re: [CMake] Compiler Test Failing on Windows 7

lps. " After doing this I thought to set cmake as 'run as admin', and that seemed to get everything to generate as it should. Thanks, Joe From: Bill Hoffman To: David Cole Cc: cmake@cmake.org Sent: Tue, January 5, 2010 3:01:47 PM Subject: Re: [CMa

Re: [CMake] Compiler Test Failing on Windows 7

I deleted the whole build directory before running the build. There isn't any modifying of the CMakeCache.txt as far as i know. Joe From: Smith Jack (Ext. - UGIS - UniCredit Group) To: "cmake@cmake.org" Sent: Tue, January 5, 2010 8:24:51

[CMake] Compiler Test Failing on Windows 7

or: CMake Error: Could not COPY_FILE. OutputFile: '' copyFile: 'C:/Users/joe/devel/RUGUD-devel/com.ara.engen.plugins.cpp/build/windows.AMD64.vc.8.release/CMakeFiles/CMakeDetermineCompilerABI_C.bin' Unable to find executable for try_compile: tried "C:/Users/joe/dev

[CMake] "continue" to find file with find_file

Hi, I am currently writing a FindXXX.cmake file which uses find_path to find an include path. Unfortunately it turns out that there might be several versions of the file in the PATHs/HINTS (e.g. several revisions of the package). (I handle this with test using the try_compile command). My ques

[CMake] FindXXX.cmake conventions

Hi, we have started to migrate the build system of our software to cmake. After a great success in starting the new build system some questions arise, when thinking about mid and long term maintainability. When writing own FindXXX.cmake modules, it seems to be of advantage to follow the same conve