akeLists.txt:9
when parsing string
In macro: bla bla \&
Invalid escape sequence \&
Call Stack (most recent call first):
CMakeLists.txt:15 (m)
-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
Regards,
Felix
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: stephan.sz...@sony.com [mailto:steph
s for project developers. Use -Wno-dev to suppress it.
-- bla bla \/\/
Regards,
Felix Ramold
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
ly
to remove
/include//_some_header.hpp, but also
the directory /include//.
Cheers,
Felix Crazzolara
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. F
list) also shows this warning.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Robert Maynard [mailto:robert.mayn...@kitware.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 4. Februar 2019 18:16
An: Ramold, Felix
Cc: cmake@cmake.org
Betreff: Re: [CMake] --warn-uninitialized works in only first configuration
This generally occurs
) don't appear again.
Is this the standard behavior?
Thanks,
Felix
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
information on each off
checked.
I wonder, is there an easier way? Is there a existing framework? How does
Kitware test the shipped modules?
Note: My original Stackoverflow question:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51948060/testing-our-cmake-modules
Thanks,
Felix
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on
tch a project from .NET Framework to .NET Standard after it has been
created.
Is it possible to generate a project targeting .NET Standard with CMake?
Thanks,
Felix
||
||
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_F
RY
is compiled at configure time.
Or I misunderstood your problem totally.
Regards
Felix
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
inf
Not sure if I'm right, but your use case looks to me as an interface-library.
For that the docu says
"A primary use-case for INTERFACE libraries is header-only libraries."
see
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.2/manual/cmake-buildsystem.7.html#interface-libraries
--
View this message in contex
have you tried CMakePackageConfigHelpers. Works great and if I understand
your email right then
it is exactly for that purpose.
--
View this message in context:
http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/Not-hardcoding-install-dir-in-Config-cmake-tp7589723p7589724.html
Sent from the CMake mailing list
see http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=10692
--
View this message in context:
http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/Building-project-with-Boost-thread-TBB-OpenCV-QT-lpthread-missing-tp7588292p7588302.html
Sent from the CMake mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Powered by www.kitware.co
ystem-vc100-mt-1_53"
(according to the value given to the -T parameter). Is this a bug in
FindBoost, or expected behavior?
Thanks,
Felix
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various serv
"../lib1)
find_package(lib1 REQUIRED)
regards
Felix
--
View this message in context:
http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/Build-application-suite-with-dependency-checking-but-single-shared-libraries-without-it-tp7586228p7586232.html
Sent from the CMake mailing list archive at Nabbl
use cmake -P myscript.cmake
--
View this message in context:
http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/how-to-run-cmake-without-cmakelist-txt-file-tp7583370p7583392.html
Sent from the CMake mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
Multiarch
Hope to find time in the next days to try a patch
Regards
Felix
--
View this message in context:
http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/cpack-deb-and-multiarch-support-tp7582720p7582740.html
Sent from the CMake mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit ot
generated control file I discovered that the field "Multi-Arch" is
missing and I don't know how to set it.
Did I overlook a CPACK_DEBIAN_??? configuration variable or is this feature
simply missing in cpack (cmake 2.8.10)?
Thx
Felix
--
View this message in context:
http://cm
you may use
set_source_files_properties(
${swig_generated_file_fullname}
PROPERTIES COMPILE_FLAGS "-w"
)
see cmake --help-module UseSWIG
--
View this message in context:
http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/swig-how-do-I-set-compile-flags-on-the-generated-files-tp7582494p
cumbersome; what happens if your
build tree is far away from the source tree?
Felix
--
View this message in context:
http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/SWIG-generated-cxx-file-location-issue-tp7581826p7581836.html
Sent from the CMake mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Powered by
e that directory. You
> could possibly try an older version of CMake to see if you can get it
> to generate a build system that works despite the "=" character, but
> the notes in that bug report make it seem unlikely to work with any
> "make"...
>
>
> HTH
omething as simple as a
space missing, but I cannot locate where to set this. The other possibility is
that "CONF=Release" is supposed to just be "Release," but again, I can find no
reference to this. I'm not sure if CONF=Release is on the N
David,
Thank you for your answer. I don't know much about Visual Studio code
coverage, but it seems to be a new feature of VS 2010. I never tested it.
You can find more information at
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms182496.aspx
However, only 32bits applications seems supported. M
Hi,
On the wiki, it is mentioned that code coverage is supported using gcov and
Bullseye. However on the CMake dashboard, under the code coverage section,
you can see that the build name for the "dash22.kitware" site
is "Win32-vs9-Release-Coverage". I wondered if this site is using Bulleye
ing the "make clean" stage.
see also the docu to
set_property
Felix
___
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
___
Powered by www.k
On Fr, 2007-12-21 at 10:41 +0100, Felix Obenhuber wrote:
> Done. The Id is: 6192 [1]
Thanks Brad for fixing! Works like a charm!
Cheers,
Felix
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
o when working with windos
boxes. But if CodeBlocks has a hard coded setup to cmd.exe that wouldn't
help either...
Yesterday I've invoked mingw32-make from a cywin shell. Think I got the
same error though - but maybe I missed something else. I'll g
using mingw32 from
Code::Blocks. So we would habe to change the default shell to something
else than cmd.exe (or patch codeblocks).
Think other probs will raise due our company workstation setup
containins some bat scripts...
Felix
___
CMake mailing l
ker and send me the bug number.
Done. The Id is: 6192 [1]
Don't hestitate to contact me for further information/testing...
Thanks,
Felix
[1] http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=6192
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org
On Do, 2007-12-20 at 12:41 -0500, Brad King wrote:
> Please submit an issue
> to the bug tracker and send me the bug number.
Thanks a lot for your help. I'll do tmorrow!
Wish you a nice time!
Cheers,
Felix
___
CMake mailing list
CMak
On Do, 2007-12-20 at 12:12 -0500, Brad King wrote:
> Felix Obenhuber wrote:
> CMake uses a "link script" approach to avoid placing the entire link
> line in the makefile. It is enabled on certain generators (including
> MinGW) and used for linking libraries but has n
ike changing file or directory names
or consolidating source file content...
Any Ideas?
Thanks for your response!
Cheers,
Felix
[1] http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2006-September/011286.html
--
Dipl.-Inf.(FH) Felix Obenhuber
OSB AG Ingenieur- und IT-Dienstleistungen
Klenzestraße 38
80469
X), and I'm not sure how to get more details.
How does the progress report mechanism work?
cheers,
felix
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
/Bootstrap.cmk/cmake_bootstrap.log
-
%
cheers,
felix
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
32 matches
Mail list logo