Thank you again Nils for the guidelines, now its time to experiment :).
Thibault
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Nils Gladitz wrote:
> On 16.07.2014 16:37, Thibault Hild wrote:
>
>> Thanks Nils for the hint.
>>
>> I guess you had to use Cmake constructs like:
>>
tion ?
Is there some sort of function repository to share these custom CMake
function tools ?
Thibault
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Nils Gladitz wrote:
> On 16.07.2014 15:08, Thibault Hild wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm quite new to CMake and after experimenting a bi
t to take
the stronger requirement i.e. "ruby >= 3.0" which is nonetheless not always
the right solution in case of a backward compatibility breakage).
Is anyone having the same kind of need over expressing packaging
dependencies (RPM or other)?
If so, did you find a way to expres