> May be you can share the hack as a patch on the bug tracker.
> May be it's unusable as-is but it may already contain valuable
> information for anyone wanting
> to tale over?
I have taken Michael Wild's advice and created a repository at github. I have
created a topic branch (branched off "mast
Update.
My allocated time slot for looking into a NetBeans generator has finished. My
impression is that patching CMake to suit our company's needs would be fairly
easy. I have actually gotten quite far with that.
But OTOH this easy way would be merely a hack that would benefit no one but us.
Hi Bill,
> Can NetBeans be driven from the command line? That is a requirement for
> getting try_compile to work.
No, I don't think it is possible call NetBeans via command line in order to
build targets. But since NetBeans relies on external tool chains like gcc,
MinGW or CygWin, is this
Hi Alex,
> Hmm, if you plan to implement a makefile-based generator, why are all
> those settings needed in the project file ?
I am not planning to implement a makefile-based generator. I just chose
cmExtraEclipseCDT4Generator as a starting point because it seemed practical.
Do you think in thi
Update.
After a more thorough look at the code, I believe that Alex was on the right
track. I have copied cmExtraEclipseCDT4Generator to cmExtraNetBeans69Generator,
registered the new generator via AddExtraGenerator() (in cmake.cxx), and
removed any Eclipse-specific stuff from my new generator.
Hi,
I am currently working on a basic generator for the NetBeans 6.9 IDE. At
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=7632, Alex Neundorf writes:
"[...] have a look at cmExtraEclipseCDT4Generator.(h|cxx) and
cmExtraCodeBlocksGenerator.(h|cxx), they are executed *additionally to the
normal makefile
