Re: [CMake] cmake build of LLVM: HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB test failure

come you’re working with LLVM 3.7, btw? That’s pretty old at this > point, and newer versions will have improved the build system (and it’s > also a lot easier to provide assistance for them). > > > > *From: *CMake on behalf of SC Warrior < > bhh...@gmail.com> > *Da

[CMake] cmake build of LLVM: HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB test failure

I watched Chris Bieneman's talk about the transition of LLVM from autoconf to cmake and he raved about how friendly / vibrant the cmake community is so I thought I'd ask this here. I posted it to stack overflow but it's fairly involved so I hope it's c

Re: [CMake] Simclist library produces simclist.c.o, simclist.c.i, simclist.c.s ...

David, Michael, Thank you for your help. [David, sorry for this double mailing to you] > > No, this is intentional, I suspect to avoid conflicts. There are people > > doing stuff like > > add_library(foo foo.c foo.cpp foo.f) > > Why is this a problem for you? Right, I understand the point of view

[CMake] Simclist library produces simclist.c.o, simclist.c.i, simclist.c.s ...

Hi there, I recently upgraded my dev system from Ubuntu 8.04 to Ubuntu 10.4. This made me change from Cmake 2.4-patch7 to Cmake 2.8.0. Since then, generating a makefile with "Cmake ." in the Simclist library source directory produces the following : #==