thank you Zaak!
you are right, after some more reading on this issue i should stick to .f90
as you suggest.
thank you for the clarification.
best regards,
radovan
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Zaak Beekman wrote:
>
> dear all,
>>
>> it seems that CMake currently does not support .f03/.F03
dear all,
it seems that CMake currently does not support .f03/.F03 suffix
for Fortran 2003 files.
is there a way for me to tell CMake to treat these files as it would treat
files ending with .f90 or .f95. i can then assign special flags to them via
source file
properties.
thank you in advance &
hi,
what i did very often was to extract the "Linux i386" binary distribution
on a x86-64 platfrom and i never had problems with it.
good luck,
radovan
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Alain Leblanc wrote:
> Which distribution? Probably one of opensuse, fedora, ubuntu, mint, arch,
> ...
>
> O
thanks a lot David!
this works very nicely.
best regards,
radovan
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:34 PM, David Cole wrote:
> > this does not seem to be the case for Experimental/Nightly.
> > inspecting the targets in the Makefiles i can see ARGS in test
> > but not in Experimental/Nightly.
>
> > do
dear all,
it is possible to run "make test" in parallel
using several processors using:
$ ARGS=-j4 make test
this does not seem to be the case for Experimental/Nightly.
inspecting the targets in the Makefiles i can see ARGS in test
but not in Experimental/Nightly.
do you know of a way/workaround
share the CMake code you
ended
up created. May be could generalize the solution to create a re-usable
module.
Thanks
Jc
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:23 PM, radovan bast <
radovan.b...@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr> wrote:
dear Jean-Christophe,
indeed the approach you demostrated works for me!
t
wrote:
Hi Radovan,
Did you manage to make use and/or generalize the code I pointed you?
Thanks
Jc
--
Sent from my mobile device
On Apr 6, 2013 10:29 AM, "radovan bast" wrote:
dear Jean-Christophe,
wonderful! thank you very much.
i will test it out.
best regards,
radovan
On Fri, 0
dear CMake developers and users,
first of all, a big thanks for the CMake developers
for a great product! we like CMake a lot.
we are extensively using CMake external project support
in combination with Git submodules in a number of larger
projects and that works nicely.
my question is: could i
