Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.8-rc1, Ninja generator, and clean target

2012-05-16 Thread Peter Collingbourne
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 02:21:10PM +0200, Nicolas Desprès wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like an issue in the generator. The symlink is created as a > side effect of a rule and not mentioned in the output files. That's > why it does not get removed. I have pushed a patch on my CMake's > github clone th

Re: [CMake] Ninja + CMake on a dashboard?

2012-03-08 Thread Peter Collingbourne
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 07:14:52AM +0100, Nicolas Desprès wrote: > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Clifford Yapp wrote: > >> > We *could*, if popular demand is high enough, merge it in anyway and > >> > call it "experimental" to start with, or we could get it right all > >> > the > >>

Re: [CMake] Ninja + CMake on a dashboard?

2012-03-06 Thread Peter Collingbourne
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 07:09:03PM +0100, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > On 06.03.12 17:10:41, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 10:41:19AM -0500, David Cole wrote: > > > 2 things I'd like to see before we merge: > > > > > > (1) test failu

Re: [CMake] Ninja + CMake on a dashboard?

2012-03-06 Thread Peter Collingbourne
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 10:41:19AM -0500, David Cole wrote: > 2 things I'd like to see before we merge: > > (1) test failures corrected on the Mac Nightly Expected dashboards > submitting using the ninja generator > (2) reliable dashboard submissions (even if not all tests pass) from a > Windows m

Re: [CMake] Ninja + CMake on a dashboard?

2012-02-15 Thread Peter Collingbourne
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:45:04AM -0500, Bill Hoffman wrote: > On 2/15/2012 10:27 AM, Nicolas Desprès wrote: > = >> I may have an Ubuntu box and maybe a OS X 10.7 machine, depending on >> what is required. >> >> What do I have to setup? >> Is the machine required to be up and running all the time?

Re: [CMake] CMake + Ninja

2012-01-14 Thread Peter Collingbourne
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 04:54:07PM -0500, Clifford Yapp wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > > > The attached patch should add support for TARGET_INSTALLNAME_DIR. > > Please let me know if it works -- it's untested, as I don't h

Re: [CMake] CMake + Ninja

2012-01-09 Thread Peter Collingbourne
27;t work that way. You can of course list specific targets to build on the command line. That said, a way of saying "build every target in this subdirectory" (for example, by specifying that subdirectory as a target on the command line) would be a nice feature to have. Thanks, -- Pet

Re: [CMake] FYI - From Ninja-build mailing list - Fwd: Proposal: restat rules

2011-09-15 Thread Peter Collingbourne
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:28:42PM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:00:05PM -0400, cmake-requ...@cmake.org wrote: > > Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 05:37:20 -0400 > > From: Clifford Yapp > > > > Looks like that's working. Running ninja again, I'm seeing another issue: >

Re: [CMake] FYI - From Ninja-build mailing list - Fwd: Proposal: restat rules

2011-09-13 Thread Peter Collingbourne
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 08:40:32AM -0400, Clifford Yapp wrote: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > > > > > > It looks like various custom commands aren't running (some tcl related > > > stuff, docbook documentation generati

Re: [CMake] FYI - From Ninja-build mailing list - Fwd: Proposal: restat rules

2011-09-11 Thread Peter Collingbourne
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 11:52:23AM -0400, Clifford Yapp wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > > > > > Anyone who is interested in trying the Ninja generator with > > their own projects is welcome to clone my repository at: > > > &g

Re: [CMake] FYI - From Ninja-build mailing list - Fwd: Proposal: restat rules

2011-09-11 Thread Peter Collingbourne
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 02:55:00PM +, Malfettone, Kris wrote: > Peter, > I am very interested in the ninja generator and gave it a try for one of my > very large projects. Unfortunately, I have approximately 100 targets all > with the same output name(simple) but in CMake I give them all uni

Re: [CMake] FYI - From Ninja-build mailing list - Fwd: Proposal: restat rules

2011-09-11 Thread Peter Collingbourne
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 10:42:13AM -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote: > This is very cool work Peter. How well is this generator doing with the > CMake tests? These are the current test results: 89% tests passed, 22 tests failed out of 203 Label Time Summary: Label1= 0.03 sec Label2= 0.03

Re: [CMake] FYI - From Ninja-build mailing list - Fwd: Proposal: restat rules

2011-09-08 Thread Peter Collingbourne
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:04:42PM -0400, Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Peter Collingbourne > Date: Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:17 PM > Subject: Proposal: restat rules > To: ninja-bu...@googlegroups.com FWIW, the Ninja genera

Re: [CMake] MingW Update for resource compilation.

2010-04-10 Thread Peter Collingbourne
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 10:20:06PM -0800, J Decker wrote: > All of the examples indicating ENABLE_LANGUAGE(RC) have the compiler > set afterwards, and it turns out that the following lines work much > better... > > I Added these to WIndows-GNU.cmake > > SET(CMAKE_RC_COMPILER "windres") > SET(CMAK