Re: [CMake] New wiki page "CMake Live Cycle Considerations"

r, shouldn't it be "Life Cycle" rather than "Live Cycle"? -- Matt Williams http://milliams.com -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the

Re: [CMake] Ninja + CMake on a dashboard?

the GCC Compile Farm? http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm -- Matt Williams http://milliams.com -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org

Re: [CMake] Undefined reference

ories(${OPENSSL_INCLUDE_DIR}) add_executable(my_daemon ${source_files}) target_link_libraries(my_daemon ${OPENSSL_LIBRARIES}) where ${source_files} is a list of your source files created by a set() call. -- Matt Williams http://milliams.com -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware ope

Re: [CMake] Ninja: a small build system closest in spirit to Make

n turn runs over some ninja files (which are also created by bootstrap.sh) to compile the full thing. -- Matt Williams http://milliams.com ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/open

Re: [CMake] Ninja: a small build system closest in spirit to Make

e.org/Bug/bug_report_page.php) to keep track of progress in a central location. In other news I've started building packages of Ninja for a number of Linux distros in the OBS. You can see it at https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=ninja&project=home%3AMilliams -- Matt Williams http

Re: [CMake] Ninja: a small build system closest in spirit to Make

On Thursday 10 Feb 2011 14:38:55 Nicolas Desprès wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Probably some of you are already aware of this new open-source project > coming from a Chrome developer at Google. > > Its goal was to improve the build system performance of the Chrome > project. So it is designed to be a

Re: [CMake] CMake interview for FLOSS Weekly in about 1 hour

On 4 March 2010 14:04, Michael Jackson wrote: > Is there an archive of the interview? I'm guessing it will appear at http://twit.tv/FLOSS -- Matt Williams http://milliams.com ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source pro

Re: [CMake] combining cmake and qmake

; Any suggestions are appreciated, You don't need to (and if you're using cmake - shouldn't) use qmake at all. It's very simple to reimplement all the qmake rules using CMake and the FindQt4.cmake package. See http://www.bineteri.com/qtwithcmake and ht

Re: [CMake] Can CMake prompt the user for input while it's running?

list. Apart from that, I've found that this works very well. -- Matt Williams http://milliams.com ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-

Re: [CMake] Can CMake prompt the user for input while it's running?

;> >> John > > The problem is that the number of options wouldn't be static because the > number of files that will be optional will change over time.  Which is why I > was wondering if there was a way to have CMake prompt while it runs.  I'd > rather avoid having a

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.0 RC 1 ready for testing!

http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/CMake_and_Source_Compatibility (written by you :D) However, (I'm no expert, but) I can't think of a time where you could break source compatibility while keeping binary compatibility. Or at least it's strange to require one but not the other. -- Ma

[CMake] Installing SWIG output (UseSWIG.cmake)

Hi all, I've just started using SWIG to create binding for my library. So far I've only bound one file, called Enums.h, with a SWIG interface Enums.i. At present my CMakeLists.txt file looks like: include(${SWIG_USE_FILE}) find_package(PythonLibs) include_directories(${PYTHON_INCLUDE_PATH}) set

[CMake] Upper or lower case for package variables in FindXXX.cmake files?

mixed case version. Based on bits and pieces I guess I am right (for example,the "DOXYGEN_FIND_QUIETLY, but it should have been Doxygen_FIND_QUIETLY" comment in FindDoxygen.cmake). Is there an official word on this as the current lack of consistency is confusing? Regards, Matt Williams

Re: [CMake] Version checking in FindFoo.cmake modules

On Tuesday 18 November 2008 00:21:46 Matt Williams wrote: > On Tuesday 18 November 2008 00:20:39 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Tuesday 18 November 2008, Matt Williams wrote: > > > I was reading up on the documentation on the 2.6 version of > > > find_package() and

Re: [CMake] Version checking in FindFoo.cmake modules

On Tuesday 18 November 2008 00:20:39 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Tuesday 18 November 2008, Matt Williams wrote: > > I was reading up on the documentation on the 2.6 version of > > find_package() and it seems that being able to pass a version string to > > it only works if

[CMake] Version checking in FindFoo.cmake modules

t the PACKAGE_FIND_NAME, PACKAGE_FIND_VERSION etc. variables aren't set. I tried to make it work but I couldn't. Am I missing something or is it really not possible to do version checking with FindFoo.cmake modules? Matt Williams signature.asc Description: This is a digitally sign

[CMake] cmake community site

t a number of other projectsmore to a cmake system, particularly for its Linux and MacOS support. I'm a Physics University student by day and a KDE programmer by night. Regards, Matt Williams http://milliams.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. _

[CMake] Finding out what a preprocessor macro is defined as

LD_MODULE_ into BUILD_MODULE. Is this possible, is there a macro that can do this, or can anyone give a suggestion as to how I could write one? Regards, Matt Williams ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake