Re: [CMake] cmake 2.8.1 compile problems on Solaris?

2010-06-03 Thread Attila Nagy
Thursday, June 3, 2010, 8:19 PM > On 6/3/2010 11:44 AM, Attila Nagy > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > it would be easy with a conditional define, something > like > > > > // If we're on Solaris... > > # if defined(sun) || defined(__sun) > > // ...

Re: [CMake] cmake 2.8.1 compile problems on Solaris?

2010-06-03 Thread Attila Nagy
el Wild > Subject: Re: [CMake] cmake 2.8.1 compile problems on Solaris? > To: "Attila Nagy" > Cc: cmake@cmake.org > Date: Thursday, June 3, 2010, 4:13 PM > I don't have solaris around, so I > can't check myself, but I suspect that CMake should be >

Re: [CMake] cmake 2.8.1 compile problems on Solaris?

2010-06-03 Thread Attila Nagy
; Subject: Re: [CMake] cmake 2.8.1 compile problems on Solaris? > To: "Attila Nagy" > Cc: cmake@cmake.org > Date: Thursday, June 3, 2010, 2:08 PM > > On 3. Jun, 2010, at 13:32 , Attila Nagy wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > is this known, or is this jus

[CMake] cmake 2.8.1 compile problems on Solaris?

2010-06-03 Thread Attila Nagy
Hi all, is this known, or is this just me doing something wrong? I cloned the cmake git repository, then changed to v2.8.1. After a succesfull bootsrap, when I try to compile Cmake, I get the bellow error (please find it at the end of the mail.) I'm doing it on Solaris snv_125 (SXCE), Studio 12.1

Re: [CMake] CMake built with Apache stdcxx has problems?

2010-04-06 Thread Attila Nagy
CMake built with Apache stdcxx has problems? > To: "Attila Nagy" > Cc: cmake@cmake.org > Date: Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 8:30 PM > Attila Nagy wrote: > > Here is the file: > > > www.orl.szote.u-szeged.hu/~attila/Slicer3Config-stdcxx.cmake > > > > Here is

Re: [CMake] CMake built with Apache stdcxx has problems?

2010-04-06 Thread Attila Nagy
/Slicer3Config-stlport.cmake Attila --- On Tue, 4/6/10, Bill Hoffman wrote: > From: Bill Hoffman > Subject: Re: [CMake] CMake built with Apache stdcxx has problems? > To: "Attila Nagy" > Cc: cmake@cmake.org > Date: Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 6:08 PM > Attila Nagy wrote: > >

Re: [CMake] CMake built with Apache stdcxx has problems?

2010-04-06 Thread Attila Nagy
Hi Bill, thanks for the quick response! :) Here is the CMakeCache.txt: www.orl.szote.u-szeged.hu/~attila/CMakeCache-stdcxx.txt Thanks, Attila --- On Tue, 4/6/10, Bill Hoffman wrote: > From: Bill Hoffman > Subject: Re: [CMake] CMake built with Apache stdcxx has problems? > To: &qu

[CMake] CMake built with Apache stdcxx has problems?

2010-04-06 Thread Attila Nagy
Hi all, I regularly build Slicer on Solaris x86_64, with Sun Studio. The latest version of Studio (12.1; CC 5.10) supports compilation with the use of Apache STDCXX (*), as it is integrated into Solaris (yes, into the OS itself, into /usr/lib). Since Apache stdcxx is far more standards-compliant

Re: [CMake] Solaris/Slicer3 advice needed

2008-03-20 Thread Attila Nagy
ted (to at least some extent) by Sun. The hw is not here yet, but I'll have a short meeting at the end of the next week about it, so it won't be in the next few days, but I hope real soonish. Thank you again, and I wish you a happy Easter! Attila Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [CMake] Solaris/Slicer3 advice needed

2008-03-18 Thread Attila Nagy
;, and "Sun cc-generated"). Thanks again! Attila Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Attila Nagy wrote: > Hi List, > > I'm new here, so please be patient! :) > > I'm building Slicer3 on Solaris 10 (and OpenSolaris too), together with > all of it&#x

[CMake] Solaris/Slicer3 advice needed

2008-03-18 Thread Attila Nagy
such problem with - for example - neither ITK or VTK. I have not found _any_ sign of "libutil" "lutil" or "LIBUTIL" or similar string in the Slicer sources, so I'm practically lost here... I'm not a CMake expert, so therefore I kindly ask you for some advic