-Original Message-
From: Stephen Kelly
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 4:47 AM
To: cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] CMake with Qt5
Alok Govil wrote:
Hi all,
I had Qt4 functional with CMake, but cannot get Qt5 to work (have upgraded
to the latest version of CMake). I have tried everything I could
Hi all,
I had Qt4 functional with CMake, but cannot get Qt5 to work (have upgraded
to the latest version of CMake). I have tried everything I could find
including a prior post on the Cmake mailing list, to no avail.
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2013-January/053259.html
http://www.
While I was suspecting something like this about CTest, your explanation helps
a lot.
I have integrated UnitTest++ into my flow, and it is working quite well. It
does also return a 0 if all tests pass, so one could integrate with CTest/CDash
if desirable.
Thanks
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:54:4
Hi all,
I tend to agree to this observation in general about CMake too. I had to do a
lot of reading and experimentation to make it do what I wanted, even though at
the end of the day, the resulting CMakeList.txt file is very simple.
I do understand why this is so. As can be seen by the
Hi Alan,
> > Just like CMake is able to distinguish different versions of Visual Studio,
> > would it distinguish MinGW-32 with MinGW-64 also (which means either both
> > would be in path simultaneously, or neither would be, and cmake picks the
> > right one based on the generator specifed)? Let
> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:32:32 -0700
> From: ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca
> To: alokgo...@hotmail.com
> CC: david.c...@kitware.com; cmake@cmake.org
> Subject: Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.2-rc2 ready for testing!
>
> On 2010-06-16 19:04-0700 Alok Govil wrote:
>
> &
d, 16 Jun 2010 22:18:34 -0400
Subject: Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.2-rc2 ready for testing!
From: david.c...@kitware.com
To: alokgo...@hotmail.com
CC: cmake@cmake.org
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Alok Govil wrote:
Hi all,
I am unable to build using MinGW-W64, but chances are there would be
Hi all,
I am unable to build using MinGW-W64, but chances are there would be some
configuration issues.
Here is how I am setup right now:
1. Download latest "automatic" builds (W64 and W32) from here:
http://mingw-w64.sourceforge.net/
2. Removed prefixes: For example, renamed file "x86_64
Sorry I was wrong. VS2005 does support compilation for 64 bits.
Best regards - Alok
From: alokgo...@hotmail.com
To: a...@lisas.de; cmake@cmake.org
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:34:52 -0700
CC: jesper.eskil...@iar.se
Subject: Re: [CMake] vcproj2cmake.rb script: announcing new version / hosting
que
Is there a possibility of adding VS2008 support? VS2008 supports compilation
for 64 bit platforms. Albeit I am still to figure 64 bit compilation using
gcc/MinGW with CMake itself.
I have heard that VS2010 has changed the file-formats for project files. I am
not keen on VS2010 support as ye
Hi Martin,
This is of interest to me as well. Please let me know what you find.
Here are two ways I could find to start a task on a remote Windows computer:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb897553.aspx
I do not know if the return code from the executable will be passed
Hi all,
I am setting CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS to "-Wall -ansi -pedantic" but would like to
remove these flags for compilation
of UnitTest++. I tried three methods of doing this with some issue with each:
1. string (REPLACE "-Wall" "" CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS ${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS})
# And likewise for -ansi a
> MSVC/MinGW-W64, etc.)
> From: dresche...@gmail.com
> To: alokgo...@hotmail.com
> CC: cmake@cmake.org
>
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Alok Govil wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am trying to use CMake to build my code under multiple configurations:
> >
Hi all,
I am trying to use CMake to build my code under multiple configurations:
1. x86 and x64
2. MSVC various versions and MinGW-W64 mainly
3. Debug and release (optional)
In each case I would like to link the code with a corresponding pre-compiled
version of UnitTest++.
(There is always
14 matches
Mail list logo
