On Mittwoch, 11. September 2019 21:22:04 CEST Kyle Edwards via CMake wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-09-11 at 22:00 +0300, Avraham Shukron wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 9:49 PM Kyle Edwards >
> > m> wrote:
> > > You can list them or not list them. CMake will recognize them as
> > > header
> > > files
On 2019 M03 28, Thu 18:22:03 CET Scott Bloom wrote:
> Just a note, for google later on… 😊
>
> The default appears to have the variable unset, so it doesn’t show up in the
> list of variables in ccmake or the cmake-gui.
> I also added it to my system before any INSTALL command was called. I don’
On 2019 M02 12, Tue 08:02:43 CET Starka Tomáš wrote:
> tldr;
> It would be wonderful to have function or signature for
> target_link_libraries tha would link only to a targets. Did I overlook
> something?
>
> like target_link_libraries(name [PUBLIC...] TARGETS myFavouriteLib ...
> QUIET/VERBOSE)
>
On 2019 M01 13, Sun 09:43:03 CET Lectem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to list all the packages (both config files and find-modules)
> that find_package could find ? Could we even imagine this would also permit
> to list the variables and targets created in it ? I think that would be a
> very hel
On 2019 M01 5, Sat 08:06:31 CET Federico Milano wrote:
> Hi. When packaging my application, I'm using install (FILES...) to copy
> some third party executables to my binary folder.
>
> 1. I do not know if I'm doing it right or if I should use install
> (PROGRAMS...)
> 2. Some of the binaries have
On 2018 M11 5, Mon 13:20:32 CET Robert Maynard wrote:
> Yes, you can do that. I don't know if there is an easier way than the
> following:
you could have a look at the following variables:
CMAKE_STATIC_LIBRARY_PREFIX
CMAKE_STATIC_LIBRARY_SUFFIX
CMAKE_SHARED_LIBRARY_PREFIX
CMAKE_SHARED_LIBRARY_SUF
On 2018 M10 28, Sun 18:46:24 CET you wrote:
> El 28/10/18 a las 18:32, Alexander Neundorf escribió:
> > well, then you do have some RPATH/RUNPATH somewhere ;-). As you say
> > probably in the libraries.
> > ld.so.conf could also contains additional search directories, but I
On 2018 M10 28, Sun 14:20:40 CET you wrote:
> El 28/10/18 a las 13:59, Alexander Neundorf escribió:
> > On 2018 M10 28, Sun 10:19:58 CET Gonzalo Garramuño wrote:
> > ...
> >
> >> 3) Why does running 'readelf -d myexecutable | grep RPATH' returns
> >
On 2018 M10 28, Sun 10:19:58 CET Gonzalo Garramuño wrote:
...
> 3) Why does running 'readelf -d myexecutable | grep RPATH' returns nothing
only grep for "PATH", then you also get the newer RUNPATH entry.
Alex
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake F
On 2018 M09 25, Tue 16:53:27 CEST David Jobet wrote:
> > What I do have a problem is rerunning protoc automatically on proto-files
> > which import proto files that have been modified.
> > How do you handle this ?
>
> I just found out I don't.
> Any idea on that one ?
here are some suggestions:
h
On 2018 M08 23, Thu 12:50:14 CEST David Jobet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to port an existing project from premake to cmake.
> I'm trying to avoid modifying the source files while doing so.
>
> Right now, we have several libraries (read in different directories) using
> proto files with import
On 2018 M08 6, Mon 21:54:33 CEST Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Am 6. August 2018 20:27:23 MESZ schrieb Philip Van Hoof
:
> >Hello everyone,
> >
> >I noticed that it sometimes happens that I find a package for a shared
> >object file(s) (or DLLs, on platforms like Windows) that have a build
> >set up us
On 2018 M08 2, Thu 10:01:39 CEST Randy Heiland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to figure out how to modify the simple "hello" demo (
> https://cmake.org/examples/) so that the Hello project is a library with an
> accompanying FindHello.cmake and then the Demo project uses that
> information and "find_pa
On 2018 M07 18, Wed 09:49:47 CEST Brian S wrote:
> I currently use cmake/ctest to build and test my software. The software is
> C++/CUDA. During the build step I don't need a GPU but in the test step I
> do. I would like to build the code with cmake on a cluster with many CPUs
> and then run the te
On 2018 M07 7, Sat 19:09:18 CEST Martin Weber wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> FYI, according to this [1], those generators do no longer work with the new
> core build introduced in CDT 9.5.
>
> Martin
>
> [1] http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cdt-dev/msg33066.html
do you know whether the new build syst
Hi,
I stumbled upon a problem with protobuf files, I attached a testcase.
There is a MyBase.proto, which is "imported" by Complex.proto.
If MyBase.proto is modified, protoc is run again in MyBase.proto, but not on
Complex.proto, although it should.
You can have a look at the attached example.
Th
On 2018 M04 5, Thu 15:15:21 CEST Juan E. Sanchez wrote:
> The example I just sent was for building in centos 6, because 5 is gone.
not really gone, it's still in vault.centos.org :-)
https://hub.docker.com/r/aneundorf/centos5-build-base/~/dockerfile/
Alex
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please
On 2018 M04 5, Thu 12:50:04 CEST Ben Sferrazza wrote:
>
> Were you able to actually build the newer versions of Cmake that require
> c++11 on Centos 5?
I didn't try that.
Alex
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/
On 2018 M04 5, Thu 21:24:40 CEST Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On 2018 M04 5, Thu 16:15:17 CEST suzuki toshiya wrote:
> > Dear Eric,
> >
> > # if anybody think "how C++11 environment should be prepared
> > # on legacy GNU/Linux" is off-topic and should be discu
On 2018 M04 5, Thu 16:15:17 CEST suzuki toshiya wrote:
> Dear Eric,
>
> # if anybody think "how C++11 environment should be prepared
> # on legacy GNU/Linux" is off-topic and should be discussed
> # in off-list, please let me know. I will do so.
>
> Eric Wing wrote:
> > Thanks for the responses.
On 2018 M04 3, Tue 16:01:58 CEST jeandet wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Reading the documentation I can see:
> https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.11/manual/cmake.1.html?highlight=find%2
> 0package#find-package-tool-mode id="-x-evo-selection-start-marker">
> "
> Note
>
> This mode is not well-supported due to
On 2018 M03 20, Tue 21:14:30 CET Mateusz Loskot wrote:
...
> Why I can not write:
>
> target_use(app Boost::system Boost::filesystem)
>
> or
>
> target_use_targets(app Boost::system Boost::filesystem)
>
> and, actually read and understand what I'm doing?
>
> (If you're now typing "why don't yo
On 2018 M01 22, Mon 15:16:50 CET Sik wrote:
> Hello CMake users and devs,
>
> In openmeeg we are reviewing our MKL package finder to make it more
> maintainable for ourselves and others who had adopted our solution.
> Therefore I'm writing you requesting comments and feedback so that is
> useful f
On 2018 M01 4, Thu 10:06:26 CET Franck Houssen wrote:
...
> ...
> target_include_directories(main PUBLIC ${PETSc_INCLUDE_DIRS})
> foreach(lib ${PETSc_LDFLAGS})
> target_link_libraries(main PUBLIC ${lib})
> message("target_link_libraries - lib is ${lib}")
> endforeach(lib)
>
> foreach(dir ${PET
On 2018 M01 4, Thu 05:09:54 CET Dave Milter wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If there is some libfoo that I want to use in my project,
> and this libfoo has it's own CMakeLists.txt I have 3 options to deal
> with such external dependency:
>
> a) Treat it like every other external dependency and write cmake co
On 2018 M01 3, Wed 10:08:09 CET Franck Houssen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> How to ask cmake to add a library path (coming from pc file) to rpath ?
>
> I checked this https://cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_RPATH_handling, but still not
> working. Can somebody help ?
> >> more main.cpp
>
> #include
>
> int main(i
On 2017 M09 21, Thu 07:18:46 CEST David Cole via CMake wrote:
> By manually deleting (or touching) the stamp file associated with the
> earliest step you need to re-run.
>
> ExternalProject is not for auto-detecting changes to stuff and
> minimally re-running build steps. It's for static stuff tha
On 2017 M10 1, Sun 12:38:43 CEST David Cole via CMake wrote:
> No, I was already promptly corrected by Brad, too. I was not
> accounting for the fact that the other find_* calls used inside of
> find modules also use CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH. I was thinking of its use to
> find a project's config file fro
On 2017 M08 10, Thu 17:15:00 CEST Robert Maynard wrote:
> > Which leads to a question I have for the Kitware types here. What
>
> should I suggest to my Linux enterprise distribution users? Can they
> simply download and use the latest Linux binary version of CMake that
> is distributed by Kitwar
On 2017 M09 13, Wed 09:50:48 CEST Patrick Welche wrote:
> I think I am confused by the following:
>
> 1) CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH;
>
> Problematic (scribus) CMakeLists.txt:
>
>set(CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH "${QT_PREFIX}/lib/cmake")
This looks wrong to me.
In general CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH should contain only t
On 2017 M08 29, Tue 11:33:15 CEST David Cole via cmake-developers wrote:
> That's correct:
>
> find modules do what they want, and most do not pay attention to
> CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH.
are you sure ?
As long as NO_DEFAULT_PATH is not used in the find_*() calls, CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH
is used automaticall
On 2017 M08 24, Thu 13:36:45 CEST Robert Dailey wrote:
> So I have a "super build" CMake script that runs a series of
> ExternalProject_Add() functions to execute builds of various third
> party libraries and install them to a path relative to the parent
> project's CMAKE_BINARY_DIR.
>
> Once the
On 2017 M05 27, Sat 15:49:35 CEST biologi spm wrote:
> Hi CMake developers,
>
> When both Mingw64 GCC and MSVC is available in PATH and run cmake
> -GNinja, cmake always choose GCC. I have to manually remove GCC from
> PATH or type -DCMAKE_IGNORE_PATH= which is very long.
you can set the CC and C
Hi John,
On 2016 M01 19, Tue 07:55:27 CET Biddiscombe, John A. wrote:
> Alex
>
> Thank you for this information. I shall test this out right away.
so, did it work out ?
Alex
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CM
On 2017 M02 3, Fri 20:32:58 CET you wrote:
> FWIW, we've moved to CentOS 6 for the binaries we package and distribute
> for ParaView. It's about the oldest widely deployed Linux distro that's
> still actively supported (EL5 is EOL'd and most deployments have long since
> moved to 6 or 7).
Yes,
On 2017 M02 2, Thu 20:07:29 CET you wrote:
> Hi Gonzalo,
>
> Using the dockcross/manylinux-x64 docker image should allow to build you
> project out-of-the-box.
> It is based on Centos5, include recent gcc, CMake, Git, etc ...
>
> See https://github.com/dockcross/dockcross
>
> In a nutshell,
>
>
On 2017 M01 26, Thu 18:23:05 CET Gonzalo Garramuño wrote:
> I currently own an Ubuntu Xenial 14.04.1 LTS box in which I do all my
> work.I distribute a binary image viewer. However, recently one of
> my users tried to run the viewer on a CentOS 7 distro and found out that
> that distro libc a
On 2016 M11 29, Tue 14:42:49 CET Robert Bielik wrote:
> Hmm.. using v3.7 the answer is no, i.e. a function declared in a subfolder
> will be available in parent scope. Seems a bit odd, doesn't it ?
this has been discussed here just recently...
Functions and macros are global.
Once they are define
On Wednesday 09 November 2016 09:22:24 Nils Gladitz wrote:
...
> You said you are not forcing your users to upgrade by setting a policy
> to OLD.
> Which implied that not setting the policy to OLD would force your users
> to upgrade ... which it doesn't.
>
> >> In fact all that setting it to OLD d
On Wednesday 09 November 2016 00:47:39 Albrecht Schlosser wrote:
> On 08.11.2016 23:01 Nils Gladitz wrote:
> > On 08.11.2016 20:26, Albrecht Schlosser wrote:
> >> I'm a developer of a public GUI library (FLTK). In this position you
> >> don't know anything about the availability of CMake versions o
On Tuesday 12 July 2016 09:00:43 portolan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am new to Cmake and I have a pretty strange behaviour: I set my c+++
> project to work with a single CMakefile.txt, and now I am trying to have
> a more proper version with a .txt for each subdirectory
>
> Pretty normal stuff, my sou
On Monday, April 18, 2016 16:57:52 Nils Rathmann wrote:
> Hi,
> when I setup with the Eclipse CDT4 generator, as described here:
> https://cmake.org/Wiki/Eclipse_CDT4_Generator4
>
> my [Targets] folder contains virtual folders for CMakeRules, Header
> Files, Object Files, Resources and Source File
On Sunday, January 17, 2016 14:01:59 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Sunday, January 17, 2016 13:45:34 Dimitri Kaparis wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Alexander Neundorf
> > >
> > wrote:
> > > On Saturday, January 09, 2016 12:27:48 Dimitri
On Thursday, February 11, 2016 13:11:29 Ron wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on a project that requires libevent and libevhtp.
> The latter is cmake managed, my project and libevent are autoconf managed.
>
> (Note that libevhtp depends on libevent, both depend on openssl, which I
> rely
> on the sys
On Wednesday, February 03, 2016 13:08:42 Andrew Bell wrote:
> If my package is installed to a non-standard location, my
> Config.cmake file is currently also installed to the non-standard
> location and can't be found by dependent projects.
>
> I see that there's export(PACKAGE ), but this creates
On Sunday, January 17, 2016 13:45:34 Dimitri Kaparis wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Alexander Neundorf
> wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 09, 2016 12:27:48 Dimitri Kaparis wrote:
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > I'm using the "Code
On Thursday, January 14, 2016 21:51:23 Biddiscombe, John A. wrote:
> Apologies for posting a cdash question question to the cmake list…
>
> CDash plots the run-time of tests, which is very useful indeed, but it would
> be even more useful if one could output a performance related ‘time’ from a
> t
On Saturday, January 09, 2016 12:27:48 Dimitri Kaparis wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm using the "CodeBlocks - Unix Makefiles" generator under linux to create
> a build tree for my project consisting of multiple executables and
> libraries.
> From the command line, I could use make -jN switch from the
On Saturday, November 14, 2015 12:19:11 Nicholas Braden wrote:
> Instead of using FOO_INCLUDE_DIR, I believe you should use
> target_include_directories() with the INTERFACE or PUBLIC options -
> this will export the include directories properly and they will be
> used when someone target_link_libr
On Monday, December 07, 2015 15:39:40 Attila Krasznahorkay wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I'm still debugging the performance problems of our build. But now I
bumped
> into another surprising thing.
>
> Our "highest level" packages can depend on a *lot* of low level
packages.
> The one I'm testing now
On Thursday, December 03, 2015 09:27:29 Ruslan Baratov via CMake
wrote:
> On 03-Dec-15 04:34, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Wednesday, December 02, 2015 12:27:42 Ruslan Baratov wrote:
> > If RPATH was _designed_ to be patchable, tools could just do it,
> > instead o
On Wednesday, December 02, 2015 12:27:42 Ruslan Baratov wrote:
> On 02-Dec-15 05:13, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
...
> > well, the RPATH entry was not designed to be patched,
>
> RPATH designed to be patched. And since it's a third time I'm making
> this statement ple
On Tuesday, December 01, 2015 07:17:35 Ruslan Baratov wrote:
> On 01-Dec-15 03:51, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Monday, November 30, 2015 16:13:03 Ruslan Baratov via CMake
wrote:
> > > On 30-Nov-15 09:10, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> >
> > .
On Monday, November 30, 2015 16:13:03 Ruslan Baratov via CMake
wrote:
> On 30-Nov-15 09:10, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
...
> > The best solution would be for cmake to fix path in executable file
> > right after installation, something similar to what cmake does with
> > rpaths.
>
> I do
On Friday, November 13, 2015 14:41:35 Nagy-Egri Máté Ferenc via
CMake wrote:
> Thank you all for your resonses,
>
> My use case is that I have a set of executables that function as unit
tests.
> Currently I use the return value of the .exe as a means of indicating
> success, though I know there
On Monday, November 09, 2015 23:21:58 Nagy-Egri Máté Ferenc via
CMake wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Can anyone tell me if CMake (or CTest) can be customized in a way to
produce
> decent benchmark output? An .xlsx perhaps, or something GnuPlot
friendly? I
> have not found any examples of CTest being (ab)used
Hi,
On Sunday, September 27, 2015 13:29:15 Talin wrote:
> I've been using CMake and Eclipse for a bunch of different projects over
> the last several years. Although many aspects of both CMake and Eclipse
> have improved over the years, using them together still has a lot of
> problems.
>
> From
On Wednesday, September 02, 2015 22:12:39 Nico Schlömer wrote:
> Indeed,
> ```
> get_target_property(out ${netCDF_LIBRARIES} LOCATION)
> message(${out})
> ```
> gives
> ```
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnetcdf.so.7.3.0
> ```
> This value appears to be set in the CMake export file
> ```
> /usr/lib/
On Wednesday, September 02, 2015 20:28:35 Nico Schlömer wrote:
> Curiously,
> ```
> message(${ZLIB_LIBRARIES})
> message(${netCDF_LIBRARIES})
> ```
> yields
> ```
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libz.so
> netcdf
> ```
> Hm, I would have expected it the other way around. :)
maybe "netcdf" is the name
On Wednesday, September 02, 2015 08:22:08 Nico Schlömer wrote:
> > it uses -l if the full path is not know or if the full path is one of the
> > system
> library dirs
>
> Hm, that sound a little weird. Using `-l` appears to delegate the library
> finding to the linker although CMake has already do
On Friday, August 28, 2015 08:23:47 Nico Schlömer wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm curious about when CMake decides to link a library by its absolute path
> and when it links using the `-l*` syntax. I came across this for the very
> simple test problem
> ```
> cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.0)
>
>
On Monday, August 17, 2015 09:15:18 Michael Jackson wrote:
> I thought there used to be a DocBook version of the documentation? At one
> point I had an XML parser that used that as input to process the
> documentation in the same way.
the way the documentation is generated has changed with version
On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 07:49:07 Nagy-Egri Máté Ferenc via cmake-
developers wrote:
...
> I believe CMake is an invaluable tool, but it could do far better. 0/10
> CMake users I’ve met say they are “happy” CMake users. The learning curve
> is steep, and the skills gained are not reusable. CMake
On Tuesday, July 07, 2015 14:36:25 Steve Borho wrote:
> Hello, I am the technical lead for x265 (HEVC encoder) and we have used
> cmake successfully since the beginning of the project. There are a few
> rough edges that we've had to work around (uninstall rules, yasm support
> in MSVC, etc) but in
On Thursday, July 02, 2015 04:13:40 Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP wrote:
> Have a look at cmake_minimum_required() and cmake_policy(). I think with
> these both it should be possible to verify you are using a cmake version
> that provides all features which are required by your project.
no, what
On Friday, July 03, 2015 09:33:42 Glenn Coombs wrote:
> I don't think policies are sufficient. I just tried using the new
> target_sources command that was introduced in CMake 3.1.0 in a
> CMakeLists.txt file that specified cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.0) and
> it didn't warn that the CMakeLis
On Monday, June 22, 2015 18:02:01 Cedric Doucet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am testing the possibility of generating Eclipse projects with CMake.
> I use the following command line:
> cmake -G"Eclipse CDT4 - Unix Makefiles" -D CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug ../src
> It works fine.
>
> However, I would like to
On Saturday, June 13, 2015 23:26:59 tors...@robitzki.de wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Am 13.06.2015 um 22:18 schrieb Alexander Neundorf :
> > On Friday, May 29, 2015 11:14:06 tors...@robitzki.de wrote:
> …
>
> >> I saw that there is a file Platform/Generic-SDCC-C.cmake, whi
On Saturday, June 13, 2015 23:17:37 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Saturday June 13 2015 22:26:12 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > did you try check_symbol_exists() and the other similar functions ?
>
> Yes, but none that I could find give any information beyond whether the
> symbol
On Thursday, June 11, 2015 19:18:55 Klaim - Joël Lamotte wrote:
> On 11 June 2015 at 15:22, Johannes Zarl-Zierl
>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > I tried several times now to find documentation about how to define
> > > and use target names which seem to have namespaces, like Qt ones.
> > >
> > > Fo
On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 01:32:21 René J. V. Bertin wrote:
> Ok, let me rephrase the question to see what other kind of constructive
> answers that'll lead to:
>
> how does one check which header file provides the prototype for a function
> from the system libraries? Function in question: reall
On Sunday, June 07, 2015 17:39:39 Peng Yu wrote:
> Hi, I following the following steps to compile gtest.
>
> https://code.google.com/p/tonatiuh/wiki/GoogleTest
>
> But the following output shows that it uses the default compiler on
> Mac OS X. I want to use some other compiler. Does anybody know
On Friday, May 29, 2015 11:14:06 tors...@robitzki.de wrote:
> Hello,
> I was looking for some resources on how to configure cmake to use the small
> device c compiler (sdcc). I tried a little bit and found that cmake assumed
> that the object file extension would be .obj. But sdcc uses .rel for obj
On Friday, April 24, 2015 12:33:50 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> The Fedora packager of PLplot is having trouble splitting installed
> results into separate binary packages because of the way that PLplot
> currently exports its targets. What steps do we have to do to make
> life easier for him?
>
> Here
On Tuesday, April 07, 2015 15:24:18 Daniel Dilts wrote:
> Looking at the way these things work, it seems to me that the ideal
> solution to my situation, if it is possible, is to do a
> add_custom_command() for each source file, and then do a
> add_custom_target() that has all of the custom command
On Tuesday, April 07, 2015 13:22:30 you wrote:
> > > > I have a custom executable that does some codegen to produce an
> > > >
> >> > > enumeration and a couple of tables. I need this to be run against
> >>
> >> each
> >>
> >> > > source file before actual compilation. It needs include directo
On Monday, April 06, 2015 21:19:57 Klaim - Joël Lamotte wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Daniel Dilts wrote:
> > I have a custom executable that does some codegen to produce an
> > enumeration and a couple of tables. I need this to be run against each
> > source file before actual compila
On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 20:14:23 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Jifeng ZHANG wrote:
> > Any idea when CMake 4.0 is planned to release? So we can get a general
> > idea when the old behavior will stop working.
>
> What will you do when it is released and the LOCATION property does stop
> working for
On Tuesday, February 17, 2015 10:28:26 Robert Ramey wrote:
> I'm using CMake 3.02 through CMake GUI.
>
> I have a CMake project which I want to build using Eclipse Luna (the most
> recent eclipse). But the GUI doesn't present me with that option. I tried
> to use the latest one (Helios) but it s
On Friday, February 13, 2015 15:12:33 Robert Maynard wrote:
> I am proud to announce that CMake 3.2 has entered the release candidate
> stage.
the new format of the release notes is really nice :-)
Alex
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
h
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 03:43:33 44ghnqv...@snkmail.com wrote:
> Alexander Neundorf wrote at 21:34 +0100 on Feb 9, 2015:
> > On Monday, February 09, 2015 18:23:41 44ghnqv...@snkmail.com wrote:
> > > How does one who is making a package which installs .cmake files
>
On Monday, February 09, 2015 18:23:41 44ghnqv...@snkmail.com wrote:
> How does one who is making a package which installs .cmake files decide
> whether to put them in .../share/cmake/Modules or .../lib/cmake? Where are
> the docs about that? I've seen examples of 3rd party packages doing both
> (
On Monday, February 02, 2015 19:23:41 Jeremy Moles wrote:
> Hello everyone! My name is Jeremy, and I've been working with AlphaPixel
> (http://www.alphapixel.com) for the last 3 years. Similar to other
> companies of the type, Chris (our CEO), gives the employees the
> opportunity to frequently wor
On Thursday, January 29, 2015 08:39:33 Chris Green wrote:
> On 1/29/15 7:41 AM, Brad King wrote:
> > On 01/28/2015 03:12 PM, Chris Green wrote:
> >> target_link_libraries( /X/Y/libtbb.so)
> >>
> >> results in link.txt files containing -ltbb.
> >
> > This happens when the library is in an implicit
On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 12:56:24 Robert Dailey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I generate my project using Eclipse CDT4 - Ninja. I have a
> subdirectory called "Third Party" under my source directory that
> contains boost, QT, and a number of other very large libraries. I
> notice that the C++ indexer
On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 14:12:03 Chris Green wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to run down a problem with our cmake-based build system
> that appears to be a result of a target_link_libraries(...) invocation
> taking a fully qualified shared library location and replacing it with
> -l. Sinc
On Saturday, December 13, 2014 00:08:44 ambreen haleem wrote:
> In my main repository where my project reside, I created a sub-directory
> called build. When I do cmake -G "KDevelop3", I do get a kdevelop project
> in the build but it has no src files and most of the files in there are
> cmake rela
On Friday, December 05, 2014 09:58:17 Luca Gherardi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I’m writing a CMake file for a project that should be compiled both in
> Ubuntu and OS X. I want to use eclipse as IDE, gcc and C++ 11.
>
> I read different threads that suggest how to enable C++ 11 in eclipse.
> According t
On Friday, October 24, 2014 11:49:55 Sahil Sehgal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was trying to build Okular (KDE application) in IDE (QT-creator and
> Kdevelop both). I did the following steps:
> 1.) clonned the source code of Okular
> 2.) loaded the source code in IDE
> 3.) click on the build command.
>
On Wednesday, October 08, 2014 18:40:53 Nico Schlömer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> in on CMake project of mine, all seems to configure fine until the
> very end where I'm getting error messages like
> ```
> CMake Error: install(EXPORT "A" ...) includes target "b" which
> requires target "c" that is not in
Hi,
thanks for your detailled findings.
Can you please create a ticket in the bug tracker with this, so it doesn't get
lost ?
http://public.kitware.com/Bug
Thanks
Alex
On Monday, October 06, 2014 14:30:06 Tushar Soni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After generating Eclipse projects and importing them, Eclips
On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 14:50:40 Volker Pilipp wrote:
...
> I suppose it is the line
> LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/XXX/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.8.2/:/opt/XXX/lib/g
> cc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.8.2/../../../../lib64/:/lib/../lib64/:/usr/lib
> /../lib64/:/opt/XXX/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-li
On Thursday, September 11, 2014 23:51:21 Nico Schlömer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> One of my projects contains two libraries libA and libB, where libB
> depends on libA, and both are exporting their configuration through
> the usual `INSTALL(EXPORT ...)` mechanisms.
> I'm getting errors of the type
> ```
On Monday, August 25, 2014 14:36:21 Никонов Михаил Николаевич wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In a bare-metal embedded project, I need to initialize compiler flags
> to custom values while toolchains are initialized; for that, I'm using
> override files to set _INIT variables. From what I've encountered, it
>
On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 09:06:13 Brad King wrote:
...
> FYI, the only intended use case for setting a policy to OLD is to
> quiet warnings in a maintenance branch of an existing release.
> Some day support for OLD behavior of some policies may be dropped,
> so all project development moving for
On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 14:59:46 Ghyslain Leclerc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> First post here. Sorry if its too long. Simply trying to be as clear as I
> can be.
>
> I am trying to make sense of the various ways to set a variable and how one
> can shadow the other. Long story short, I am trying to
On Thursday, July 24, 2014 08:38:08 Dominique Ledit wrote:
> Hi
>
> I currently use 2.8.12.2 CMake version and Qt 4.7.3 and set in my top-level
> CMakeLists.txt the CMAKE_AUTOMOC to true Set (CMAKE_AUTOMOC on)
> As a result, in the build log there are a lot of messages like:
>
> AUTOMOC: Checking
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 04:03:44 Payal Prajapati wrote:
> Hello,
> Thank you for your reply.
> Is there any way to build only my added file? because it takes much
> time to rebuild the whole project even for a minor change in source
> file?
when you simply build (all, make all), only those file
On Monday, July 21, 2014 08:40:11 Payal Prajapati wrote:
> hello All,
>
> Two things to say:
>
> 1)I read all conversion regarding this topic..but can any one explain me
> the whole procedure?
> 2)I am working on orfeo toolbox which i imported in eclipse.It works fine
> upto make target->build s
On Sunday, May 25, 2014 11:43:18 you wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Alexander Neundorf > wrote:
> >
> > On Saturday, May 24, 2014 18:35:06 J Decker wrote:
> > > So I've had to pick up eclipse to try and learn it; figured maybe if I
> >
&g
1 - 100 of 2433 matches
Mail list logo
