Re: [CMake] Experiments in CMake support for Clang (header & standard) modules

2018-04-30 Thread Stephen Kelly
On 04/30/2018 11:30 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > Interestingly, GCC is taking a directory-centric approach in the > driver (-fmodule-path=) as opposed to the 'add a file to your > compile line for each import' that Clang and MSVC are taking: > >  http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cxx-modules > > Why is Clang n

[CMake] Experiments in CMake support for Clang (header & standard) modules

2018-04-30 Thread Stephen Kelly
On 04/20/2018 01:39 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm experimenting with creating examples (& potential changes to CMake > itself, if needed/useful) of building clang modules (currently using > the semi-backwards compatible "header modules", with the intent of > also/moving towards suppo

Re: [CMake] Memory usage and configuration time for large project

2018-04-30 Thread R0b0t1
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Patrick E Gartung wrote: > Hi, > > We have a large c/c++/fortran project, CMSSW, that is built with a custom > tool, scram.  > > https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw > > The project might move to a cmake based build in the future. The scripts to > convert to CmakeLi

[CMake] Memory usage and configuration time for large project

2018-04-30 Thread Patrick E Gartung
Hi, We have a large c/c++/fortran project, CMSSW, that is built with a custom tool, scram.  https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw The project might move to a cmake based build in the future. The scripts to convert to CmakeLists.tx has been written https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw2cmake Tests show