On 11/09/2016 09:06 PM, Ruslan Baratov wrote:
So why the project in the middle of the migration process is not a valid
case? It is maintained but the exact migration step is paused, but I
have an intention to improve the code in future. Anyway even if the
project is no longer maintained, then w
All of these version work, but because of the various kinds of automated
setups I use, the command line options seems the best compromise.
However, I realized that I have a include file in my source code which is
ignored from the source control since it is user/system dependent, and I have
put
On 09-Nov-16 23:00, Nils Gladitz wrote:
> On 09.11.2016 15:52, Ruslan Baratov wrote:
>> Can you show the real code? The code that in your opinion doesn't
>> violate the "right way of policy usage"?
>
> It is not a question about code. It is a question about context and
> use case.
You just said tha
On 09/11/2016 16:05, Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
Hi,
TL;DR
Is there a default value for CMAKE_MODULE_PATH which allows me to use a module
file from inside my PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR.
Context:
Over past few days, Boost has updated from version 1.61 to version 1.62. The
latest version of CMake that I have (
On 09.11.2016 15:52, Ruslan Baratov wrote:
Can you show the real code? The code that in your opinion doesn't
violate the "right way of policy usage"?
It is not a question about code. It is a question about context and use
case.
Valid context as the documentation states would e.g. be a projec
Hi folks,
A few months later, would anyone have an explanation for this?
Thank you,
Carl
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Carl Poirier
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have a question here regarding the use of the DEBUG_POSTFIX. When I set
> it as well as the property OUTPUT_NAME, the former is corre
Hi,
TL;DR
Is there a default value for CMAKE_MODULE_PATH which allows me to use a module
file from inside my PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR.
Context:
Over past few days, Boost has updated from version 1.61 to version 1.62. The
latest version of CMake that I have (3.6.3) does not yet have the appropriate
F
Can you show the real code? The code that in your opinion doesn't
violate the "right way of policy usage"?
On 09-Nov-16 22:14, Nils Gladitz wrote:
> On 09.11.2016 14:57, Ruslan Baratov wrote:
>>
>> Again policies are not meant to be feature toggles.
>> You can do a lot of things and there may be v
Hmm, maybe...? I'm not sure. Customize may be the wrong word. What I'm
asking in the question is similar to someone asking "how do I customize the
output path for the binaries in CMake?". My hope was it was going to be a
simple set variable for the utilities.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016, 7:56 AM Jakob van
On 09.11.2016 14:57, Ruslan Baratov wrote:
Again policies are not meant to be feature toggles.
You can do a lot of things and there may be valid use cases but in
general policies are not meant to be used this way.
This is made explicit in CMake's documentation on policies.
They exist to preser
On 09-Nov-16 19:51, Nils Gladitz wrote:
> On 09.11.2016 12:04, Ruslan Baratov wrote:
>> On 09-Nov-16 16:22, Nils Gladitz wrote:
>>> On 09.11.2016 04:29, Ruslan Baratov wrote:
On 08-Nov-16 23:33, Nils Gladitz wrote:
> On 11/08/2016 04:17 PM, Ruslan Baratov wrote:
>
>> Except it's ex
Hej,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Saad Khattak wrote:
> I am working on a plugin for Maya and it uses a customized version of Qt.
> Maya's SDK comes with everything to build Qt (headers, libraries and
> customized Qt tools such as moc.exe).
>
> I have the following issues:
>
> (1) With CMAKE_
Hej,
You should be able to query the LINK_LIBRARIES (and maybe some related
properties), see
https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.6/prop_tgt/LINK_LIBRARIES.html
Sincerely,
Jakob
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Tiago Macarios
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way for me to get CMake libraries out of a t
Oops, totally forgot to mention the crux: I happened to be the guy who
apparently was the first to start using continue() - so by the time my
college got to me, we quickly found out the issue. But before the college
hit the problem, I didn't have the vaguest clue that I was typing code that
would r
+1 for me too - sometime ago a college of mine spend quite some time to
figure why he couldn't bootstrap our application - turns out he was using
an (old) CMake version which didn't know about the 'continue' command. The
error-messages coming out of CMake sometimes help, but more often don't
really
On 09.11.2016 12:04, Ruslan Baratov wrote:
On 09-Nov-16 16:22, Nils Gladitz wrote:
On 09.11.2016 04:29, Ruslan Baratov wrote:
On 08-Nov-16 23:33, Nils Gladitz wrote:
On 11/08/2016 04:17 PM, Ruslan Baratov wrote:
Except it's exactly opposite :) `cmake_minimum_required` is about new
features/c
On 09-Nov-16 16:22, Nils Gladitz wrote:
> On 09.11.2016 03:47, Ruslan Baratov wrote:
>> On 09-Nov-16 06:01, Nils Gladitz wrote:
>>> I think the git tag creation dates should roughly equate release dates:
>>> https://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=tags
>> What about the future releases? There w
On 09-Nov-16 16:22, Nils Gladitz wrote:
> On 09.11.2016 04:29, Ruslan Baratov wrote:
>> On 08-Nov-16 23:33, Nils Gladitz wrote:
>>> On 11/08/2016 04:17 PM, Ruslan Baratov wrote:
>>>
Except it's exactly opposite :) `cmake_minimum_required` is about new
features/commands, and policies is ab
On 09.11.2016 03:47, Ruslan Baratov wrote:
On 09-Nov-16 06:01, Nils Gladitz wrote:
I think the git tag creation dates should roughly equate release dates:
https://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=tags
What about the future releases? There was a page
https://cmake.org/Bug/changelog_page.php b
On 09.11.2016 04:29, Ruslan Baratov wrote:
On 08-Nov-16 23:33, Nils Gladitz wrote:
On 11/08/2016 04:17 PM, Ruslan Baratov wrote:
Except it's exactly opposite :) `cmake_minimum_required` is about new
features/commands, and policies is about behavior.
I don't agree and you can not separate the
20 matches
Mail list logo
