you'll need separate includes for dlopen thing, because you'll need the
functions declares are pointers...
void (*f)( void );
or typedefed as functions
typedef void (*some_function_type)( void );
some_function_type f;
Or better include all those in a structure
struct dl_interface
{
void (*f)
For future reference:
The solution is to delete your build folder and generate the projects
again. Not sure what is changed by CMake in 3.0 but VS does not like it
unless the build folder is cleaned.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Saad Khattak wrote:
> I have a solution with multiple projects
Not off topic at all.
Try start, test, submit, test, submit. Should work.
Start is the thing that writes a new time stamp tag, and all that follows
should be associated with the most recent start's tag.
HTH,
David C.
> On Sep 5, 2014, at 5:07 PM, "Biddiscombe, John A." wrote:
>
> Sorry if
On 06.09.2014 00:44, Ted Middleton wrote:
Just wondering if there's a nice way of getting a library target's
includes but not linking to it, so I can use dlopen() on it instead.
If I want to build a shared library that gets implicitly loaded by an
executable, I would do this:
mylib/CMakeLis
Just wondering if there's a nice way of getting a library target's includes
but not linking to it, so I can use dlopen() on it instead. If I want to
build a shared library that gets implicitly loaded by an executable, I
would do this:
mylib/CMakeLists.txt:
add_library( mylib SHARED src/mylibma
Sorry if this is off topic for the list.
If I
ctest –D ExperimentalStart
ctest –D ExperimentalTest –R test1
ctest –D ExperimentalSubmit
Then
ctest –D ExperimentalStart
ctest –D ExperimentalTest –R test2
ctest –D ExperimentalSubmit
It appears as two entries on the dashboard, but I’d like to have
Wow.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
information on each offering, please visit:
CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/su
On 9/5/2014 11:49 AM, Chuck Atkins wrote:
Unfortunately on Windows and VS builds there's not really a simple answer.
My blog might be of help:
http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/post/434
-Bill
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.
Hi,
I thought you might enjoy 400 extra functions for doing more complicated
things with cmake (also comes with an interactive cmake console which is
implemented in pure cmake).
Some features:
* maps,(structural variables)
* object oriented programming with cmake language (prototypical inheritance
The easiest option with visual studio is to use the /mp compiler flag by
setting it in the CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS environment variables in your ctest
script. This will parallelize each target across all CPUs. Target-level
parallelism may or may not also happen since that's dependent on your local
co
What generator? All of them of course. I am trying to setup our "build bots" on
several environments including OS X, Linux and Windows. I have ninja built and
installed on the Windows machine. I would _prefer_ to use Visual Studio and
ninja so that we have a sanity check to make sure both types
On 09/05/2014 03:44 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Am I doing something wrong or is this a known bug?
I have a list of about 5 headers, CODEC2_PUBLIC_HEADERS.
I used set_target_properties( PROPERTIES PUBLIC_HEADER
${CODEC2_PUBLIC_HEADERS})
The remaining items in ${CODEC2_PUBLIC_HEADERS} are interpre
Am I doing something wrong or is this a known bug?
I have a list of about 5 headers, CODEC2_PUBLIC_HEADERS.
I used set_target_properties( PROPERTIES PUBLIC_HEADER
${CODEC2_PUBLIC_HEADERS})
then in the install target I added:
PUBLIC_HEADER DESTINATION ${CMAKE_INSTALL_INCLUDEDIR}/codec2
When I do
> Actually my interpretation of the manual says that the _tests_ will be run
> in parallel. What I want is the _Build_ to be run in parallel.
>
Indeed that is just the parallel test execution. Parallel build is usually
generator specific, controlled through CTEST_BUILD_FLAGS. For example: if
you
Actually my interpretation of the manual says that the _tests_ will be run in
parallel. What I want is the _Build_ to be run in parallel.
Thanks
Mike Jackson
On Sep 4, 2014, at 5:14 PM, Iosif Neitzke wrote:
> Does ctest -j , or ctest --parallel behave differently?
>
> http://www.cmake.org/c
On 04-Sep-14 20:40, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
On 4. September 2014 16:38:21 MESZ, Ruslan Baratov via CMake
wrote:
On 04-Sep-14 18:09, Anders Lindgren wrote:
make sure that the argument don't form a valid variable name.
It's not possible
set(a b)
set(b c)
if(">${a}<" STREQUAL "
No, they do not behave differently.
"-j" and "--parallel" are aliases for each other, using either one goes
through exactly the same command line argument processing code...
HTH,
David C.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cm
When the coverage shows "0%" is there any indication that the
ctest_submit for the coverage step failed? (i.e. do you log the output
of ctest, and does it show anything about failing to submit?)
That's another type of intermittent network blip that I see, where
there's a successful local build
We do not use a license manager.
The following files are created in the Testing/Temporary folder:
[DATE]-[TIME]-covbr.stderr
[DATE]-[TIME]-covbr.stdout
[DATE]-[TIME]-covsrc.stderr
[DATE]-[TIME]-covsrc.stdout
LastCoverage_[DATE]-[TIME].log
Which shows the symbols which are normally shown in CDash
On 09/04/2014 11:12 PM, Nico Schlömer wrote:
referring to the documentation of execute_process() [1], is there a
defined behavior about what happens if OUTPUT_FILE and ERROR_FILE
point to the same file?
On windows execute_process() will fail and complain that the file is
already being used by
On 09/05/2014 05:46 AM, fungos wrote:
3. I've seen some questions about if CMake/Kitware have any interest in
contributions on this area, but I've never found a reply from some of
the core developers. What is the reason for this? Is this objective too
hard to achieve or there are no interest?
I
21 matches
Mail list logo
