I am trying to set up component registration as per
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake/Tutorials/Packaging
but when I run Cmake I get the error
install TARGETS given unknown argument "EXPORT".
While I've found many hits on Google with that error string, none that I
have found have any resolutio
On 2014-02-12 17:22- Dominic Walsh wrote:
Hi
I am trying to use the Ninja generator to compile on a Windows machine using
the Visual Studio 11 compilers.
From a VS11 console I run cmake (version: 2.8.11.2 ):
cmake -G Ninja -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME=MSVC ..
I then ru
Hi
I am trying to use the Ninja generator to compile on a Windows machine using
the Visual Studio 11 compilers.
>From a VS11 console I run cmake (version: 2.8.11.2 ):
cmake -G Ninja -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME=MSVC ..
I then run Ninja (version 1.4.0)
ninja -v
and all appea
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Matthew Woehlke <
mw_tr...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> What you really want is to record the "old" list of output files, re-run
> CMake, then remove any files on that list that no longer have rules to
> generate them. If you do a complete 'clean' you will dele
On 2014-02-12 11:35, Abe Bachrach wrote:
The Makefile that cmake generates includes a rule to automatically re-run
cmake if any of the input CMakelists.txt files change.
Currently, if you change the name of an executable target (or library), it
will leave the old file in the output location, and
Hi there,
The Makefile that cmake generates includes a rule to automatically re-run
cmake if any of the input CMakelists.txt files change.
Is there a way to configure this rule to have it run clean first?
Currently, if you change the name of an executable target (or library), it
will leave the
>>> Should I file this as a bug in the issue tracker then?
>> Sure. Especially if you have an easy way to reproduce. (Either
>> reference an external, publicly available project we can "just
>> build" and get it to happen, or attach a CMakeLists that
>> demonstrates the issue if possible.)
>>
>>
That's just the quick brain dump version. If necessary, I can
actually
look at old commits, or the current code to try to refresh my memory.
I think that's needed. Can you do that research into the commits and
discussion?
I know it's been a week now I'm still getting to this. Will re-o
#1. The cmake roadmap informs me that 100% of version 3.0
is complete. Any news on when this will be released?
"Soon":-)
(Although, disclaimer: I'm not responsible for it anymore, so I can't
be more precise than that...)
#2. How does the development team decide which issues
are includ
Hello,
#1. The cmake roadmap informs me that 100% of version 3.0 is complete. Any news
on when this will be released?
#2. How does the development team decide which issues are included in any given
release? As an example, I reported a feature request some months back
(http://www.cmake.org/Bu
10 matches
Mail list logo