Thanks for these suggestions. Numdiff might be good, but I don't think I'm
allowed to include anything GPL in the distribution. Maybe I will have to
write my own as Bill suggests.
-Original Message-
From: cmake-boun...@cmake.org [mailto:cmake-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of
Thompson,
On 2013-05-21 11:14-0500 Kenneth Boyd wrote:
No, I do not have a dual-boot Windows/Linux system on hand. I suspect that a
Fedora LiveCD boot for testing would not be comparable to a proper install
(my experience has been that Fedora LiveCD Linux is visibly slower than a
native Windows install
On 5/21/2013 2:25 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 5/19/2013 8:34 PM, Paul Lanken wrote:
Not sure how to begin to investigate these but, I was surprised to see :
Would be great if you could run a nightly dashboard on your machine.
Would you be willing to do that? We do not have access to a Solaris 1
Jim,
You might consider using numdiff (http://www.nongnu.org/numdiff/). We use this
tool to compare test output to a gold standard file where the output has mixed
text and floating point values.
-kt
> -Original Message-
> From: cmake-boun...@cmake.org [mailto:cmake-boun...@cmake.org]
On 5/19/2013 4:46 PM, Leek, Jim wrote:
Unfortunately, I don't think that's powerful enough. The test
results consist of about 100 lines of floating point numbers mixed in
with text. I would like to make sure that all of those floating
point numbers are "correct" (Within 1% would probably be clo
On 5/19/2013 8:34 PM, Paul Lanken wrote:
Not sure how to begin to investigate these but, I was surprised to see :
Would be great if you could run a nightly dashboard on your machine.
Would you be willing to do that? We do not have access to a Solaris 10
machine anymore. Also, do older versio
Kenneth Boyd wrote:
> No, I do not have a dual-boot Windows/Linux system on hand. I suspect
> that a Fedora LiveCD boot for testing would not be comparable to a
> proper install (my experience has been that Fedora LiveCD Linux is
> visibly slower than a native Windows install, across multiple ver
On 5/20/2013 3:32 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2013-05-20 11:52-0500 Kenneth Boyd wrote:
Can somebody with access to MSYS bash.exe on Microsoft Windows verify
that startup latency by timing "--version" options for standard
commands such as cmake? If such times on a normal PC are hundreds of
mil
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin
To: Jens Auer
Cc: cmake
Sent: Tue, May 21, 2013 11:38 am
Subject: Re: [CMake] Checkout specific revision from svn with
ExternalProject_Add
Hi Jens,
You could specify the revision using: SVN_REVISION -r "17027"
For example:
Hi Jens,
You could specify the revision using: SVN_REVISION -r "17027"
For example:
https://github.com/Slicer/Slicer/blob/f3b155fdf266134c274c97773710f4d4e7514858/SuperBuild/External_EMSegment.cmake#L25
Hth
Jc
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Jens Auer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to chec
Hi,
I am trying to checkout a specific revision of external dependencies from our
repositoty using the SVN_REPOSITOTY parameter of ExternalProject_Add, but
always get the following error:
2> Creating directories for 'Hippomocks'
2> Performing download step (SVN checkout) for 'Hippomocks'
2> A
Hi,
A number of compilers have some options to do syntax checking, as well as
produce warnings about questionable constructs. Does anyone know a good way
to create phony targets based on the normal targets? e.g. in the compile
step you pass flags like -warn -syntax-only and skip the linking step, a
12 matches
Mail list logo
