Re: [CMake] compiler defines for sub projects

thanks for your answer. I've forgot to mention in the hurry yesterday, that inisde the lib project generator exist which must not compiled with these defines. if(FOO_OPTION OR BAR_OPTION) add_executable(generator_target ...) set_target_properties(generator_target ... COMPILE_DEFINITIONS

[CMake] New package for advance syntax coloring of CMake scripts in Emacs

Hi! I just uploaded an Emacs package that provides syntax coloring for CMake scripts in Emacs. It is available at: https://github.com/Lindydancer/cmake-font-lock Although the standard package have some syntax coloring support, this package raises the bar quite a bit. The main new feature is

Re: [CMake] compiler defines for sub projects

If you want to have all of the sub directories to have the defines present, you could use ADD_DEFINITIONS(). option(FOO_OPTION "enable foo" OFF) option(BAR_OPTION "enable bar" OFF) if(FOO_OPTION) add_definitions("-DFOO_X" ) elseif(BAR_OPTION) add_definitions("-DFOO_Y") else() add_

[CMake] compiler defines for sub projects

Hello, is it possible to inherit compiler defines for sub projects in sub directories? I have a library project which can be configured at compile time using preprocessor defines (cmake option) option(FOO_OPTION "enable foo" OFF) option(BAR_OPTION "enable bar" OFF) if(FOO_OPTION) set_

[CMake] Borland compiler: How to remove / override the -tWR option?

Hi. It seems that the Borland bcc compiler is hardcoded to be called with option -tWR. (meaning of the flag: use dynamic runtime library) Windows-Embarcadero.cmake sets an internal variable set(_tR "-tWR -tW-") and calls the compiler with " ${_tR} ...". Do you see any way to remove / overrid

Re: [CMake] rpmbuild architecture

2013/4/5 > I'm trying to build an i686 RPM package on a x86_64 Linux machine. > > I have a set(CPACK_RPM_PACKAGE_ARCHITECTURE i686) > but I get an error at CPack time: > error: No compatible architectures found for build > > I can get it to work if I also use setarch when calling rpmbuild giving

Re: [CMake] is it possible to download CMake modules at configure time?

Hi Radovan, This is possible. You could look at the approach we consider in CTK. See https://github.com/commontk/CTK/compare/00694c9f8a0da6ee28fb079902e6a8c3ec428058...891aa5443b110cc7e6aa0ec1339aad4b2c83ef9d Hth Jc On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:03 PM, radovan bast < radovan.b...@irsamc.ups-tlse.fr

[CMake] is it possible to download CMake modules at configure time?

dear CMake developers and users, first of all, a big thanks for the CMake developers for a great product! we like CMake a lot. we are extensively using CMake external project support in combination with Git submodules in a number of larger projects and that works nicely. my question is: could i

[CMake] rpmbuild architecture

I'm trying to build an i686 RPM package on a x86_64 Linux machine. I have a set(CPACK_RPM_PACKAGE_ARCHITECTURE i686) but I get an error at CPack time: error: No compatible architectures found for build I can get it to work if I also use setarch when calling rpmbuild giving it the CPack gener

Re: [CMake] Is it a bug that cmake / cpack could not handle directory name with @?

2013/4/5 hce > Eric Noulard wrote > > 2013/4/5 hce < > > > jupiter.hce@ > > > > Eric Noulard wrote > > I'll think of a workaround for CPackRPM, the fastest solution would be to > > use > > CPACK_RPM_USER_BINARY_SPECFILE > > > > see: > > cpack --help-variable CPACK_RPM_GENERATE_USER_BINARY_SPECFIL

Re: [CMake] Is it a bug that cmake / cpack could not handle directory name with @?

Eric Noulard wrote > 2013/4/5 hce < > jupiter.hce@ > > > > Yes for CPack RPM I can see why that is happening. > The spec file generated by CPackRPM is >1) generated >2) configured (with @ONLY) > > This is handy for many reason so @ in pathname should be protected > otherwise > they wil

Re: [CMake] Is it a bug that cmake / cpack could not handle directory name with @?

2013/4/5 hce > Hi, > > I have a binary directory contains subdirectories name with "@": > > graph3d/@graph3d/@colorbar/colorbar.m > scribe/@scribe/@colorbar/colorbar.m > > When I run cpack -G RPM, it removed @ and put following string name in the > spec: > > graph3d/graph3d/colorbar/colorbar.m >