On behalf of myself, Ken, Bill, Brad, Alex, Eike, Steve, Eric, Zach,
Ben and the rest of the CMake team from all around the world, we are
pleased to announce that CMake 2.8.10 is now available for download
at:
http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/?C=M;O=D
It is also available from the usual download
The only character you need to escape in the whole sequence is the
backslash. You only have to escape a $ if it precedes a { to disambiguate
from a variable dereference.
This works for me:
$ cat w.cmake
file(WRITE "w.txt" "$'\\r'")
$ cmake -P w.cmake
$ cat w.txt
$'\r'
HTH,
David
On Wed, Oc
On 2012-10-31 19:34, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
After a lot of thrashing around I finally discovered that
file(WRITE "\$""'""\\r""'")
worked to write the literal string
$'\r'
to a file, i.e, so that the od -a result was
$ ' \ r '
Is there an easier way to write this literal string to a f
After a lot of thrashing around I finally discovered that
file(WRITE "\$""'""\\r""'")
worked to write the literal string
$'\r'
to a file, i.e, so that the od -a result was
$ ' \ r '
Is there an easier way to write this literal string to a file that I missed?
Alan
__
David Doria wrote:
> When using automoc, I still have to do:
>
> include_directories(${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR})
>
> so that the compiler can find the MOCed files that get created in the
> build directory. Should this be done automatically so there is one
> less thing the user has to worry abou
I think it is my stupidity again as usual. :D
$myrepository/tools/bin/cl.exe caused it because that was found due to
a wrong PATH handling. I have inserted that before the rest instead of
appending. The local cl.exe was preferred from the repository and
cmake seems to have been unhappy about that
On 10/31/2012 1:07 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
Does CMake work from the command line without python on a simple project?
No.
Does it work with nmake or any other generators?
No.
Laszlo
What is in CMakeError.log and CMakeOutput.log?
--
Bill Hoffman
Kitware, Inc.
28 Corporate Drive
Clifton Pa
> Does CMake work from the command line without python on a simple project?
No.
> Does it work with nmake or any other generators?
No.
Laszlo
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-t
I am not sure if the link worked correctly because the websocketpp symbols seem
to be missing. When MyApp is linking in boost and websocketpp
Linking CXX executable MyApp
../../lib/MyServer/libMyServer.a(MyServerWebsocketServer.cpp.o): In function
`boost::shared_ptr::operator->() const':
/MyDev
Use the full path to the file libwebsocketpp.a in your
target_link_libraries call instead of "websocketpp"
HTH,
David
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Marshall, Rob wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am using ExternalProject_Add to build websocketpp.
>
> The build is successful and libwebsocketpp.a is gen
Hi,
I am using ExternalProject_Add to build websocketpp.
The build is successful and libwebsocketpp.a is generated.
But it appears to be generated as a "UTILITY" rather than a "STATIC".
How can I configure ExternalProject_Add to build websocketapp as "STATIC"?
When I try and link in websocketpp
On 10/31/2012 6:19 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
I have also tried to enable the --debug-trycompile, but did not help
for me. This is the CMakeError.log:
Can you back up a few steps?
Does CMake work from the command line without python on a simple
project? Does it work with nmake or any other genera
Hello,
I am trying to create a modular development environment. My goal is to
have different source modules in separate source control projects.
Sometimes there will be dependencies between these modules. I also will be
scooping in 3rd party projects and placing some kind of wrapper build
around
I have also tried to enable the --debug-trycompile, but did not help
for me. This is the CMakeError.log:
Compilation of the C compiler identification source
"CMakeCCompilerId.c" did not produce an executable in
"C:/foobar/build/CMakeFiles/CompilerIdC".
Compilation of the C compiler identification
Am 31.10.2012 10:37, schrieb Rolf Eike Beer:
Am , schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:02 AM, David Doria
wrote:
I just learned about automoc, and it is fantastic! I have been able to
get rid of all of my manual QT4_WRAP_CPP calls. Is there a similar way
to get rid of my Q
Am , schrieb Andreas Pakulat:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:02 AM, David Doria
wrote:
I just learned about automoc, and it is fantastic! I have been able
to
get rid of all of my manual QT4_WRAP_CPP calls. Is there a similar
way
to get rid of my QT4_WRAP_UI calls? They are equally as bulky t
This is the python statement I am trying to execute on my Windows box
just in case:
subprocess.call(["cmake", "-GNMake Makefiles JOM",
"-DCMAKE_MODULE_PATH=" + os.environ["CMAKE_MODULE_PATH"].replace("\\",
"/"), os.path.pardir if len(sys.argv) == 1 else sys.argv[1]])
Laszlo
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:02 AM, David Doria wrote:
> I just learned about automoc, and it is fantastic! I have been able to
> get rid of all of my manual QT4_WRAP_CPP calls. Is there a similar way
> to get rid of my QT4_WRAP_UI calls? They are equally as bulky to write
> out manually :)
No
18 matches
Mail list logo
