Michael Jackson wrote:
> Maybe I missed some other part of this conversation, but "where" are you
> hanging out? IRC? Webcase? Mail list?
Oh, sorry. The main meeting point would be the #cmake channel on
irc.freenode.net. Of course I'll also have a look on the lists, but the
message delay makes t
Also, the design goal of ninja was to build things "as fast as
possible". And when "convenience and speed are in conflict, prefer speed."
Although I can't totally disagree with Loadens comment to keep it simple
and your comment that the speed is reasonable now.
Op 24-9-2012 18:06, Wouter
Maybe I missed some other part of this conversation, but "where" are you
hanging out? IRC? Webcase? Mail list?
Thanks
--
Mike Jackson
On Sep 24, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm planning to do sort of a "start contributing to CMake" session this
> weekend, mainly on
Hi,
Worked couple of days ago. Help welcome.
Laszlo
-- Found Threads: TRUE
-- Found OpenSSL: /usr/lib/libssl.so
-- Looking for _POSIX_TIMERS
-- Looking for _POSIX_TIMERS - found
CMake Error at
/usr/share/apps/cmake/modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:198
(MESSAGE):
Did not find automoc
Hi all,
I'm planning to do sort of a "start contributing to CMake" session this
weekend, mainly on Saturday. I'm not absolutely sure if I can make it, but the
plan is definitely to be around ~1200-1600 CEST. I'm around in the channel
basically all the time, so you may ask questions any time. Bu
I have a build that needs to cross-compile. The directory structure
looks something like this:
/src
/lib
|
-- linux
|
-- libFoo.so
|
-- embedded
|
-- libFoo.so
libFoo.so under embedded was cross-compiled, and I have a Toolchain
file to cross-compile my project's source and I
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 01:33:04 -0700, Aaron Smith said:
>I'm working on a C project and using CMake. I've been trying to get
>coverage testing working and am just about there.
>
>This is what I have figured out so far:
>
>-use clang for c compiler. "gcc" on the latest Xcode does nothing with
>-fprof
On 09/24/2012 07:04 AM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 9/23/2012 4:29 PM, Burlen Loring wrote:
hmmm, I was a bit hasty in concluding that the issue has gone away in
newer releases. on another system, I have the issue with cmake 2.8.8.
The intel compiler version there is 11.1. On this system if I don't
i
Hi all,
I'm trying to figure out if there is a way to get a postflight script
installed in a CPack (with PackageMaker generator) package that uses
components. If I don't use components, it works just fine. If I manually
copy the postflight script INTO the individual component, it works.
However
No, ninja is not really slow. Only when the filesystem caches are cold,
a no-op build does take a considerable time. So yeah, the performance
difference will not be very big when the caches are hot.
Wouter
Op 24-9-2012 11:17, Peter Kümmel schreef:
On 24.09.2012 11:04, Nils Gladitz wrote:
On Monday 24 September 2012 08:39:14 you wrote:
> /usr/bin/c++ -static CMakeFiles/Runtime.dir/Runtime.cpp.o -o
> ../bin/Runtime \
> -rdynamic /usr/local/lib/libzmq.a /usr/local/lib/libczmq.a -lpthread
> -lrt ../lib/libComm.a ../lib/libConfig.a
> ../lib/libComm.a(Comm.c.o): In function `Comm_
I tried shifting the order around, to no avail.
I updated the gist to try to make the output a little more readable.
https://gist.github.com/3776497
I'm not sure why different flags are set here on the MacOS build vs. the
Linux build. On Mac OS I'm using clang compiler. On Linux, Gnu
The rele
On Monday 24 September 2012 08:28:26 Davis Ford wrote:
> Hi, I have a project that I'm able to build fine on Mac OS with CMake, but
> when I check same project out on Ubuntu 12.04, I'm getting undefined
> reference errors at link time.
>
> Here's the relevant section of the CMakeLists.txt file, an
Hi, I have a project that I'm able to build fine on Mac OS with CMake, but
when I check same project out on Ubuntu 12.04, I'm getting undefined
reference errors at link time.
Here's the relevant section of the CMakeLists.txt file, and make VERBOSE=1
output for both Mac OS X (success) and Ubuntu 12
Hi all,
I seem to have a problem when using add_test(... CONFIGURATIONS ...) and
running 'make test' on Linux. It's skipping the test.
The CMakeLists.txt contains:
#...
enable_testing()
add_test(NAME test1 CONFIGURATIONS db COMMAND ...)
#...
On Windows, I invoke CMake like this:
cmake -DCMAKE_CO
On Sep 24, 2012, at 10:18 AM, David Doria wrote:
>> Well, if ${_var} is already a cache variable, you can retrieve it's
>> HELPSTRING property to see what was set as the original doc string. But if
>> it's not, then there won't be one, and you'll be adding an undocumented
>> option...
>>
>>
> Well, if ${_var} is already a cache variable, you can retrieve it's
> HELPSTRING property to see what was set as the original doc string. But if
> it's not, then there won't be one, and you'll be adding an undocumented
> option...
>
>
> http://cmake.org/cmake/help/v2.8.9/cmake.html#section_
On 9/23/2012 4:29 PM, Burlen Loring wrote:
hmmm, I was a bit hasty in concluding that the issue has gone away in
newer releases. on another system, I have the issue with cmake 2.8.8.
The intel compiler version there is 11.1. On this system if I don't
include $INTEL_ROOT/include/intel64 explicitly
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Reza Housseini wrote:
> Hello
> I want to add my own library libsieve.so with the header file Sieve.h
> to the custom target. I have the following setup:
>
> find_program(MKOCTFILE_EXECUTABLE mkoctfile)
> if(NOT MKOCTFILE_EXECUTABLE)
> message(SEND_ERROR "Failed
On 24.09.2012 11:38, Loaden wrote:
Thanks for reply!
For NMake Makefiles or Unix Makefiles generator, it's works fine.
The dependenty set correct. no problem.
When you post build.ninja and rules.ninja, I'll have a look at it.
2012/9/24 Peter Kümmel
it could be that your pch implementation
Thanks for reply!
For NMake Makefiles or Unix Makefiles generator, it's works fine.
The dependenty set correct. no problem.
2012/9/24 Peter Kümmel
> it could be that your pch implementation forgets to
> set a dependency.
>
--
*Please don't ask where I come from, It's a shame!*
Best Regards
Y
On 24.09.2012 10:59, Loaden wrote:
Hello everyone!
I just know ninja, and like the small / fast. It's realy awesome.
But I find some issue, I am just a newbie both of CMake and Ninja.
So, If you interesting, have a look here.
1. 'ninja edit_cache' does not work if cmake-gui does not exist.
2. 'n
On 24.09.2012 11:04, Nils Gladitz wrote:
When I tried with one of my larger projects the first no-op build after
a full build took something between 20 and 30 seconds but no-op builds
after that were below a second.
I'm not really sure what would cause this (I guess disk or filesystem
caching?).
When I tried with one of my larger projects the first no-op build after
a full build took something between 20 and 30 seconds but no-op builds
after that were below a second.
I'm not really sure what would cause this (I guess disk or filesystem
caching?).
Nils
On 09/24/2012 10:42 AM, Peter
Hello everyone!
I just know ninja, and like the small / fast. It's realy awesome.
But I find some issue, I am just a newbie both of CMake and Ninja.
So, If you interesting, have a look here.
1. 'ninja edit_cache' does not work if cmake-gui does not exist.
2. 'ninja test' does not work with CMake-p
I prefer keep it simply.
2012/9/24 Peter Kümmel
> On 23.09.2012 15:04, Wouter van Kleunen wrote:
>
>>
>> I had the following idea to speed up the building even more, if a tool
>> can be build in ninja to list all files that need to be stat when
>> building a project. These files can be monitore
On 23.09.2012 15:04, Wouter van Kleunen wrote:
I had the following idea to speed up the building even more, if a tool
can be build in ninja to list all files that need to be stat when
building a project. These files can be monitored by qtcreator and later
be provided as input again to ninja. So
27 matches
Mail list logo
