Hi,
should it work to use the NMake generator with a compiler wrapper like
mpicc? If I try to use the mpicc from OpenMPI 1.6 it doesn't work (see
below for messages). This is with cmake 2.8.8 and both with standard nmake
and nmake-jom. It works fine without the wrapper and it also works find to
co
Hi Brendan -
On Jun 18, 2012, at 11:49 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> Is it possible to use the Microsoft compiler (cl) with "Unix Makefiles"?
>
> I found some older list postings that suggested it could work; however,
> setting CC, CXX, and CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER to "cl" doesn't do the trick. (It
Is it possible to use the Microsoft compiler (cl) with "Unix Makefiles"?
I found some older list postings that suggested it could work; however,
setting CC, CXX, and CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER to "cl" doesn't do the trick.
(It appears that the compiler doesn't like some of the flags used in the
makefi
Hi Michael,
To apply the flag on a specific target, consider looking at:
https://github.com/commontk/Log4Qt/blob/patched/CMakeLists.txt#L116
Hth
Jc
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Michael Jackson <
mike.jack...@bluequartz.net> wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the help. I really have a typo in my C
Thanks everyone for the help. I really have a typo in my CMake code so thanks
for every one for finding that. Basically we build a few libraries which other
parts of our code depend on. One particular library has to be a shared library
but links statically to the other libraries in order to avoi
On 18/06/2012 23:09, Michael Jackson wrote:
Linux really wants to have -fPIC for some of my code and I am trying to detect
linux and then add this flag for my project but I am having no luck.
if (LINUX)
set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS ${CMAKE_CSS_FLAGS} "-fPIC")
endif()
Is this NOT the way I shoul
Starting to dislike the gmail program.
So here's a corrected message , to the list this time:
===
This is how I've been doing for years. Doesn't mean it's the right way :)
Here -O3 and -DLINUX don't apply to your case, and ${SRC_FILES} has been
assigned wi
I'm not a Linux guy, so hopefully someone else more knowledgeable
can chime in here, but if you want to add to your CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS,
you need to avoid creating a semi-colon-separated list by moving the
quote mark:
set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -fPIC")
Linux really wants to have -fPIC for some of my code and I am trying to detect
linux and then add this flag for my project but I am having no luck.
if (LINUX)
set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS ${CMAKE_CSS_FLAGS} "-fPIC")
endif()
Is this NOT the way I should be doing this? It doesn't really "fell" corr
Am 18.06.2012 08:34, schrieb luxInteg:
On Sunday 17 June 2012 14:13:00 Andreas Naumann wrote:
#--build2: gs_test/results.c. build disabled near beginning
but comes in ~65% of build
[ 65%] Building C object Lib/CMakeFiles/gsl.dir/__/test/results.c.o
cd /home/TESTS/BUILDgsl/Lib&
That's right. You can pass various initial cache entries, such as
BOOST_ROOT, via the CMAKE_CACHE_ARGS parameter to ExternalProject_Add.
A useful example of this is the Titan project:
http://www.kitware.com/InfovisWiki/index.php/Main_Page
You can see how it builds VTK as an external project, forci
I'll check out the reference to b2, thanks for the heads up.
My own project is hosted with SVN, not GIT, so I did not want to require my
developers to find and install a git client to get the build to work; that is
why I wanted to choose the zipball.
--
Messag
On 6/18/2012 2:03 PM, Knox, Kent wrote:
That is an interesting approach; if this 'superbuild' cmake project
downloaded and built all the external dependencies first, then my
project could find those dependencies with the appropriate find
module? I suppose that the 'superbuild' could set the BOOS
That is an interesting approach; if this 'superbuild' cmake project downloaded
and built all the external dependencies first, then my project could find those
dependencies with the appropriate find module? I suppose that the 'superbuild'
could set the BOOST_ROOT variable (or other appropriate v
> 4. ExternalProject_Add will download, configure and build projects at
> ‘build’ time. From the documentation, this sounded like a design decision.
> However, this means that you can’t use the already robust and mature
> findboost() module to configure the Boost project. Would it be possib
2012/6/18 Doug :
> Yeah, I really should. :)
>
> Is this ok? Or shall I create a bug and attach the patch to that? (attach
> patch; it's very minor; just missing 3 of the variables)
It's ok and pushed to next.
Merge topic 'CPackDeb-docUpdate' into next
264c156 CPackDeb add missing documentation
Hi all,
is it possible to somehow set the command which 'make clean' or
'Build->Clean in VS' performs for a file? My situation is that a
custom command creates a symlink to a directory. I'd like to delete
this symlink when 'Clean' is performed. This fails silently on Unix
(no action is performed)
On 18/06/2012 08:42, Knox, Kent wrote:
BUILD_COMMAND bjam --with-program_options address-model=64
toolset=msvc-11.0 link=static stage
Two comments here:
- bjam has been renamed to b2 since Boost 1.47
- this probably uses the bjam/b2 in the path, rather than the one that
you just built with
Yeah, I really should. :)
Is this ok? Or shall I create a bug and attach the patch to that? (attach
patch; it's very minor; just missing 3 of the variables)
doug@shadowmint:~/ext/cmake$ ./bin/cpack --help-variable-list |grep DEB <--
All in there now~
CPACK_RPM_PACKAGE_DEBUG
CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_A
Am 2012-06-17 14:39, schrieb Alexander Neundorf:
I consider this feature still experimental, it needs users (like you)
to actually figure out whether it is real-world useful.
Can you open a ticket for this please in the tracker ?
Filed as issue #13311.
IMHO, for a real pkg-config replacement,
20 matches
Mail list logo