Re: [CMake] Chaining cmake project building

2011-11-19 Thread J Decker
I did find a solution that works - if I remove the EXTRA_FLAGS parameter and instead use ${ARGN} and pass the extra defines as normal then it doesn't get extra quoted. On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 6:21 PM, J Decker wrote: > I have a chain of cmakelists that have to be run in sequence with some > other

[CMake] Chaining cmake project building

2011-11-19 Thread J Decker
I have a chain of cmakelists that have to be run in sequence with some other commands inbetween... I have been working on a cmakelists.txt which builds the project... This is a simple project that demonstrates the issue... - CMakeLists.txt -- cmake_minimum_req

Re: [CMake] VC2010 Express + CMake = fails

2011-11-19 Thread Robert Dailey
I mean specifically is there some environment variable that CMake checks for the location of VC2010? I want to make sure the correct path is set on it. Thanks. - Robert Dailey On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Michael Jackson < mike.jack...@bluequartz.net> wrote: > The best way to ensu

Re: [CMake] VC2010 Express + CMake = fails

2011-11-19 Thread Michael Jackson
The best way to ensure your environment is setup correctly is to launch cmake from one of the dedicated command prompts that come with visual studio. - Mike Jackson www.bluequartz.net Principal Software Engineer mike.jack...@bluequartz.net BlueQuartz Software

Re: [CMake] VC2010 Express + CMake = fails

2011-11-19 Thread Robert Dailey
Seems that for some reason the VC2010 scripts are finding the VS 2003 compiler, which is where the shorthand form of that path points. Obviously the path for VC2010 Express doesn't have ".NET" in the path. Where is it looking for the path to VC2010 Express? Maybe my environment is setup improperly

Re: [CMake] Transitive linking

2011-11-19 Thread David Cole
On Nov 19, 2011, at 2:02 AM, James Bigler wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Michael Hertling wrote: > On 11/18/2011 10:03 PM, James Bigler wrote: > > 2011/11/18 Alexander Neundorf > > > >> On Friday 18 November 2011, James Bigler wrote: > >>> I thought CMake knew how to not drag all t

Re: [CMake] Transitive linking

2011-11-19 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 19.11.11 00:02:22, James Bigler wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Michael Hertling wrote: > > > On 11/18/2011 10:03 PM, James Bigler wrote: > > > 2011/11/18 Alexander Neundorf > > > > > >> On Friday 18 November 2011, James Bigler wrote: > > >>> I thought CMake knew how to not drag all

Re: [CMake] Transitive linking

2011-11-19 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Saturday 19 November 2011, Michael Hertling wrote: > On 11/18/2011 10:03 PM, James Bigler wrote: > > 2011/11/18 Alexander Neundorf > > > >> On Friday 18 November 2011, James Bigler wrote: > >>> I thought CMake knew how to not drag all the dependent libraries once > >>> you linked an executable