Hi Robert,
I reviewed the patch, and I am not sure vsAuxPath should be a
requirement. As I stated earlier, we've gotten the binding to work
acceptably without it and I assume others have as well. Further, some
users may prefer to enter their connection information in to the
perforce dialog on fi
Hi All,
We have noticed, that using the VS_SCC_* target properties, we can
bind to a perforce SCM server. However, the way that SCC works the
perforce plugin has to prompt the user for connection information.
When we were doing this with hand-made visual studio solutions, we
would only be prompte
Hi Robert,
I don't pretend to know everything there is to know about Visual
Studio SCC integration, but I have gotten this to work before with a
bit of trial and error, and reverse-engineering the entries visual
studio creates for these properties.
To answer your most recent question, there is no
http://ads.itgfiles.com/plugins/maintenanceStatisticsTask/oxMarketMaintenance/scripts/woflisv.htm
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic a
The OS X .dmg installer, cmake-2.8.6-Darwin64-universal.dmg, at
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/resources/software.html, failed to install symlinks
in /usr/bin as promised. I received six messages, I think from the Cmake app,
of this nature:
Failed create symlink installation may be incomplete: x
w
I forgot to explain why I made the change to begin with. Basically this all
comes down to Perforce binding support. SccAuxPath is used to specify the
Perforce connection string. Without this, each project opened will prompt
the user for the information via modal dialog. This gets very annoying...
I fiddled around with TortoiseGit and managed to create the patch. It is
attached.
Please integrate this into your repository so it is included in version
2.8.7 :)
-
Robert Dailey
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Robert Dailey wrote:
> I have added source code support for this myself.
I have added source code support for this myself. I updated the following
files:
cmLocalVisualStudio7Generator.cxx
cmLocalVisualStudio10TargetGenerator.cxx
The existing SCC support code was already in these files, I just added the
SccAuxPath support to it.
I'm not an expert at creating patch fil
On Monday, October 31, 2011 02:39:16 pm Pierre-Francois Laquerre wrote:
> Short version: shouldn't the macros in Modules/Qt4Macros.cmake call
> ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND with VERBATIM?
Yes, it looks like it should. Can you add a bug in the bug tracker?
Thanks,
Clint
>
> Long version:
>
> I'm trying
On 31.10.11 21:07:45, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Monday 31 October 2011, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to achieve something like this by using cmake:
> > http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.8/activeqt-comapp.html
> >
> > I would like to have a QObject subclass in my main.cpp file sinc
On Monday 31 October 2011, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2011, 20:58:45 schrieb Alexander Neundorf:
> > On Saturday 29 October 2011, Robert Dailey wrote:
> > > I have several complex functions which require a ton of documentation.
> > > I wanted to type this documentation directly
On Monday 31 October 2011, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > Please add a bug in the cmake bug tracker for that:
> > http://public.kitware.com/Bug/
>
> David Faure has fixed it today, and the patch is probably in your
> inbox somewhere. :P
Haven't noticed anything.
Beside that, I committed a fix to the Dont
There are actually 4 SCC related key/value pairs used in VS2003 VCPROJ
files:
SccProjectName="SAK"
SccAuxPath="SAK"
SccLocalPath="SAK"
SccProvider="SAK"
CMake supports these 3 via set_target_properties():
VS_SCC_LOCALPATH
VS_SCC_PROJECTNAME
VS_SCC_PROVIDER
Apparently one more is needed to suppo
On Friday 28 October 2011, Alistair Lowe wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I just wished to let you know about a blog series I'm working on:
>
> http://blog.quickforge.co.uk/2011/10/exploration-of-cross-compiling-on-wind
> ows-for-arm-linux-distributions/
>
> It details my experiences working with CMake, Bo
Short version: shouldn't the macros in Modules/Qt4Macros.cmake call
ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND with VERBATIM?
Long version:
I'm trying to build
https://github.com/pflaquerre/torch/tree/build-under-path-with-parentheses
with cmake 2.8.5. It works fine when building in, say, /tmp/test/, but
not in /tmp/tes
Am Montag, 31. Oktober 2011, 20:58:45 schrieb Alexander Neundorf:
> On Saturday 29 October 2011, Robert Dailey wrote:
> > I have several complex functions which require a ton of documentation. I
> > wanted to type this documentation directly in the cmake file right above
> > the function() itself,
> Please add a bug in the cmake bug tracker for that:
> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/
David Faure has fixed it today, and the patch is probably in your
inbox somewhere. :P
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.co
On Monday 31 October 2011, Laszlo Papp wrote:
...
> [code]
> cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.8)
> find_package(Automoc4 REQUIRED)
> include_directories(${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}
> ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}) find_package(Qt4)
> include_directories(
> ${QT_INCLUDES}
> ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BIN
On Monday 31 October 2011, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to achieve something like this by using cmake:
> http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.8/activeqt-comapp.html
>
> I would like to have a QObject subclass in my main.cpp file since it
> has just one method for instance, and thus it would be
On Saturday 29 October 2011, Robert Dailey wrote:
> I have several complex functions which require a ton of documentation. I
> wanted to type this documentation directly in the cmake file right above
> the function() itself, but it is turning out to be a formatting nightmare.
>
> What would you gu
On Saturday 29 October 2011, Renato Utsch wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Well, I am currently using cURL for a project of mine, but on windows I
> can't find the cURL library only using the find_package(CURL) provided with
> CMake, although it works fine with linux.
>
> So, I created a directory named "deps
While waiting on a response I did some experimentation:
set_target_properties(
"${project_name}" PROPERTIES
VS_SCC_LOCALPATH "${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}"
VS_SCC_PROJECTNAME "Perforce Project"
VS_SCC_PROVIDER "MSSCCI:Perforce SCM"
)
This seems to work in VS 2003 but the annoying thing is that when I ope
Hey guys,
Our team is running Perforce here at work and I want to setup any Visual
Studio projects generated to use source control bindings for Perforce.
The documentation for VS_SCC_PROJECTNAME, VS_SCC_LOCALPATH, VS_SCC_PROVIDER
is pretty bad and I really have no clue on how to use these. Could
On 31.10.11 15:38:52, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > You're not supposed to add the mocfiles variable contents you receive
> > from qt4_wrap_cpp to the list of sources. In particular not because you
> > already #include that same file in the main.cpp. If you look at the
> > generated file you'll notice tha
Okay: I got it working by using qt4_generate_moc :) I am not sure it
is the cleanest way. Fixing the "set(CMAKE_AUTOMOC ON)" abort will
probably the cleanest.. Thank you for your help again! :)
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.8)
include_directories(${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOUR
2011/10/27 Phil Smith :
> Ok, tried the CMakeLists change, no change.
>
> The Dignus-related files are attached.
Thanks, nothing strange in there.
Sorry for the delay, but I'm entering a not so much spare time loop
moreover I should admit I do not have any more debugging idea
for your problem.
S
> You're not supposed to add the mocfiles variable contents you receive
> from qt4_wrap_cpp to the list of sources. In particular not because you
> already #include that same file in the main.cpp. If you look at the
> generated file you'll notice that it requires all the declarations from
> the mai
On 31.10.11 14:47:07, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> I am now attaching the log about the following files:
>
> 1) CMakeLists.txt file
> 2) main.cpp
> 3) build log
> 4) moc_main.cxx
>
> Q_MOC_OUTPUT_REVISION is somehow not defined, but not sure why.
You're not supposed to add the mocfiles variable contents
I am now attaching the log about the following files:
1) CMakeLists.txt file
2) main.cpp
3) build log
4) moc_main.cxx
Q_MOC_OUTPUT_REVISION is somehow not defined, but not sure why.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 31.10.11 13:10:28, Laszlo
On 31.10.11 13:10:28, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> Thank you for your help Andreas. I have tried your approach. Please
> see the attached logs. The moc files are now somehow not generated. I
> might need to use qt4_wrap_cpp after all ?
Sorry, seems like my local experiments led to wrong conclusions here.
Thank you for your help Andreas. I have tried your approach. Please
see the attached logs. The moc files are now somehow not generated. I
might need to use qt4_wrap_cpp after all ?
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
-- The C compiler identification is GNU
-- The CXX compiler identification is GNU
-- Check
On 31.10.11 12:15:23, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to achieve something like this by using cmake:
> http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.8/activeqt-comapp.html
>
> I would like to have a QObject subclass in my main.cpp file since it
> has just one method for instance, and thus it would be a con
Hi,
I would like to achieve something like this by using cmake:
http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.8/activeqt-comapp.html
I would like to have a QObject subclass in my main.cpp file since it
has just one method for instance, and thus it would be a convenient
approach for me.
This is my current CMakeLists
33 matches
Mail list logo
