> On 09/29/2011 06:15 AM, Yuri Timenkov wrote:
>> When I was investigating similar problem, I found alternative approach
>> at
>> http://code.google.com/p/dynamorio/source/browse/trunk/CMakeLists.txt.
>>
>> The thing is to change linker rules, to something like this:
>> set(CMAKE_C_CREATE_SHARE
On 09/30/2011 04:18 AM, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> ~
> I should have added that I am able to compile and run c code using gcc
> ~
> C
> --
Again, cpp and gcc are *NOT* C++ compilers. You need to install g++.
Since Knoppix is Debian based, "apt-get install g++" should do the trick.
Michael
--
P
On 09/29/2011 06:15 AM, Yuri Timenkov wrote:
> When I was investigating similar problem, I found alternative approach at
> http://code.google.com/p/dynamorio/source/browse/trunk/CMakeLists.txt.
>
> The thing is to change linker rules, to something like this:
> set(CMAKE_C_CREATE_SHARED_LIBRARY
Hello everyone..
I have two library files in two different directories and my project
involves linking one library with the another..So i used
Target_link_libraries..but i am unable to execute the executable and it is
giving the error as
"In function `main':
main.C:(.text+0x1c1): undefined referenc
~
I should have added that I am able to compile and run c code using gcc
~
C
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_F
On 9/29/2011 10:03 PM, Albretch Mueller wrote:
On 9/29/11, Eric Noulard wrote:
gcc is a C compiler not a C++ compiler.
Do you have 'g++" installed?
What does
g++ --version says?
$ g++ --version
bash: g++: command not found
but I definitely have a c++ compiler installed
$ which cpp
/us
On 9/29/11, Eric Noulard wrote:
>
> gcc is a C compiler not a C++ compiler.
>
> Do you have 'g++" installed?
>
> What does
>
> g++ --version says?
$ g++ --version
bash: g++: command not found
but I definitely have a c++ compiler installed
$ which cpp
/usr/bin/cpp
$ cpp --version
cpp (Debian 4
>
> Tested cmake/ninja with Blender's cmake files, works well, and fast!
> Single file rebuild is 0.97 sec, same on makefiles was 3.7sec.
>
I also have some numbers:
Building LyX (lyx.org, 676 files):
LyX has autotools and cmake as build system.
* cmake generate
On 09/29/2011 11:42 PM, EXT-Harris, Scott H wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using cmake-2.8.6-rc4.
>
> In my configuration file, config/cmake/linux.cmake, I have:
> set ( COMPILER_HOME
> /home/harris_s/cots/linux/v12.1/SunStudio12u1-Linux-x86-tar-ML/sunstudio12.1 )
SET(COMPILER_HOME ... CACHE STRING "Compil
Hi,
I am using cmake-2.8.6-rc4.
In my configuration file, config/cmake/linux.cmake, I have:
set ( COMPILER_HOME
/home/harris_s/cots/linux/v12.1/SunStudio12u1-Linux-x86-tar-ML/sunstudio12.1 )
and generated my makefiles like:
cmake -C config/cmake/linux.cmake .
and I would like to use ${COMPILER_
Hi,
I'm targeting Xcode, I have different apps and a single library the apps
depend on.
The resources of the individual apps are added simply by appending them to
ADD_EXECUTABLE(... ${RESOURCES}) in the CMakeLists.txt of the individual
project.
After this, Xcode is made "aware" of them by sett
Do you include(CTest) in your main CMakeLists.txt file?
The value of the MAKECOMMAND cache variable, established in the file
Modules/CTest.cmake should be the thing that controls the value of
MAKECOMMAND for configuring either DartConfiguration.tcl or
CTestConfiguration.ini.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Jaka Katrašnik
wrote:
> But which one?
>
> I'm trying to follow the steps of this tutorial
> (http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/CMake:MatlabMex). However I don't know how to apply
> the patch that is referenced in it. The patch is for Linux machines and I'm
> using Windows.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> People tend to misunderstand the purpose of build systems like CMake and
> autotools. They try to make the detection bullet-proof and most likely fail.
> You can see that this is wrong by looking at those auto* setups that take
> ages to d
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
>
> Just a few of my thoughts on this:
>
> - There are several ways to handle dead symlinks:
> 1. Don't check, let the linker complain (status quo)
> 2. Check whether the found library is a symlink, and if not valid,
> remove it silently
Am Donnerstag, den 29.09.2011, 10:32 +0200 schrieb Hendrik Sattler:
> Zitat von Micha Renner :
>
> > Am Donnerstag, den 29.09.2011, 09:22 +0200 schrieb Hendrik Sattler:
> >> Zitat von Michael Wild :
> >> > Just a few of my thoughts on this:
> >>
> >> Same for me.
> >>
> >> > - There are several wa
2011/9/29 Albretch Mueller :
> I am using knoppix and I am trying to build cmake's sources into a
> local directory, but this is what I get:
> ~
> $ ./bootstrap; make; make install
> -
> CMake 2.8.5, Copyright 2000-2009 Kitware, Inc.
> C compiler on this
Zitat von Micha Renner :
Am Donnerstag, den 29.09.2011, 09:22 +0200 schrieb Hendrik Sattler:
Zitat von Michael Wild :
> Just a few of my thoughts on this:
Same for me.
> - There are several ways to handle dead symlinks:
> 1. Don't check, let the linker complain (status quo)
> 2. Check whe
I am using knoppix and I am trying to build cmake's sources into a
local directory, but this is what I get:
~
$ ./bootstrap; make; make install
-
CMake 2.8.5, Copyright 2000-2009 Kitware, Inc.
C compiler on this system is: cc
Am Donnerstag, den 29.09.2011, 09:22 +0200 schrieb Hendrik Sattler:
> Zitat von Michael Wild :
> > Just a few of my thoughts on this:
>
> Same for me.
>
> > - There are several ways to handle dead symlinks:
> > 1. Don't check, let the linker complain (status quo)
> > 2. Check whether the foun
Zitat von Michael Wild :
Just a few of my thoughts on this:
Same for me.
- There are several ways to handle dead symlinks:
1. Don't check, let the linker complain (status quo)
2. Check whether the found library is a symlink, and if not valid,
remove it silently from the list of candi
> On 09/29/2011 07:15 AM, Clifford Yapp wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Michael Hertling
>> mailto:mhertl...@online.de>> wrote:
>> I guess the question revolves around the expectation of find_library
>> being different from find_file - as a user, my expectation would be
>> that find_lib
22 matches
Mail list logo
