Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.6-rc2 ready for testing!

2011-09-05 Thread Johannes Stallkamp
Hello Dave, Am 05.09.2011 18:29, schrieb Johannes Stallkamp: > > http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=12260 > > is listed with target 2.8.6, but it's not listed in the changes (yet?). > > Will it be fixed for the next release or will it be pushed to 2.8.7? > > > Thank you, for fixing this. I w

Re: [CMake] novice question: modification of FLAGS rule variable?

2011-09-05 Thread David Cole
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:31 PM, David Dunkle wrote: > Is it possible to read and to set a property/rule variable like ? > What syntax would I use to do that? I mean as it, for example, > appears here: > > > > set(CMAKE_C_COMPILE_OBJECT "${target_compiler} -c -o ") > > > > For example can I do so

[CMake] novice question: modification of FLAGS rule variable?

2011-09-05 Thread David Dunkle
Is it possible to read and to set a property/rule variable like ? What syntax would I use to do that? I mean as it, for example, appears here: set(CMAKE_C_COMPILE_OBJECT "${target_compiler} -c -o ") For example can I do something like this (this is pseudo code)? #read set(MY_FLAGS, ${} ); .

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.6-rc2 ready for testing!

2011-09-05 Thread Andrea Galeazzi
No, it's not a regression, but you can consider it as an "Incomplete feature" introduced from 2.8.4 to 2.8.5 Thanks, Andrea David Cole ha scritto: I've assigned 12294 to Alex, he's the "cmake eclipse guy"... but he's on vacation, and I'm not sure he'll be back in time to take a look at this and

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.6-rc2 ready for testing!

2011-09-05 Thread Johannes Stallkamp
Hello, http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=12260 is listed with target 2.8.6, but it's not listed in the changes (yet?). Will it be fixed for the next release or will it be pushed to 2.8.7? Regards Johannes ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit ot

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.6-rc2 ready for testing!

2011-09-05 Thread David Cole
I've assigned 12294 to Alex, he's the "cmake eclipse guy"... but he's on vacation, and I'm not sure he'll be back in time to take a look at this and figure out if there's a quick fix for it or not. Is this a regression from a previous version of CMake, or has it always been this way? We will soon

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.6-rc2 ready for testing!

2011-09-05 Thread Andrea Galeazzi
<> Could someone take a look at 0012294 please? David Cole ha scritto: The CMake 2.8.6 release candidate stream continues! You can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/?C=M;O=D This email is also available on the Kitware blog at http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/po

[CMake] Controlling content of gnerate.stamp.depend

2011-09-05 Thread Dominik Rausch
Hi I'm wondering if it is possible to control whether or not a file that is opened from a CMakeLists.txt is added to the generate.stamp.depend file and thus checked for up-to-dateness before each build. We currently scan several files, most of which we don't actually use in the build system, b

Re: [CMake] Problem with linker on win32

2011-09-05 Thread uruloki
Ok, i've found the problem I wanted to use the same options for the compiler that those we use in the actual tool chain. Some of those options are not compatible, but msvc compiler doesn't always complain. The one which caused me headaches was /c, it suppresses the implicit call to the linker,

Re: [CMake] Xcode deployment postprocessing

2011-09-05 Thread Robert Bielik
Johan Björk skrev 2011-09-05 09:28: I don't remember when the deployment stuff is executed in xcode. How do you package your product? If you are using cpack ,you can tell it to strip the binary before packaging it. I haven't gotten that far yet, and besides I'm allergic to PackageMaker, spec

Re: [CMake] Xcode deployment postprocessing

2011-09-05 Thread Johan Björk
I don't remember when the deployment stuff is executed in xcode. How do you package your product? If you are using cpack ,you can tell it to strip the binary before packaging it. /Johan On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Robert Bielik wrote: > Tack Johan, > > Johan Björk skrev 2011-09-04 09:12: >