Re: [CMake] GenerateExportHeader macrr for CMake?

2011-06-04 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2011, 21:17:49 schrieb Stephen Kelly: > Hi, > > I came up with an idea to simplify the creation of export headers for > hidden visibility by using configure_file. > > After implementing it I saw that the idea has come up before :) > > http://www.mail-archive.com/cmake@cmake.o

Re: [CMake] setting the shell env

2011-06-04 Thread dfurtney
>What kind of environment is this ? >So you do this under windows, but with some kind of unix tools ? >Is this cygwin or more like mingw ? WindRiver provides the wrenv.exe/.sh (depending on the platform) utility to help setup the environment for production. It is available for windows and unix s

Re: [CMake] setting the shell env

2011-06-04 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Saturday, June 04, 2011 09:57:44 PM dfurt...@cox.net wrote: > Usually we use the vxworks command shell to do command line builds. > Windriver supplys many utilites including its own sh.exe. Is there a way > to tell CMake to use the windriver sh and/or env setup? Please keep the mailing list on

[CMake] GenerateExportHeader macrr for CMake?

2011-06-04 Thread Stephen Kelly
Hi, I came up with an idea to simplify the creation of export headers for hidden visibility by using configure_file. After implementing it I saw that the idea has come up before :) http://www.mail-archive.com/cmake@cmake.org/msg27058.html Please see the attached proof of concept. Could we get

Re: [CMake] VxWorks Cross Compilation Strategy

2011-06-04 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Saturday, June 04, 2011 05:09:27 PM Dan Furtney wrote: > Can the pre-link commands be added to the vxworks.cmake with a > ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND call? I initially tried doing this in the > CMakeLists.txt file via a ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND(TARGET...) call and a special > LINK command I can't recall. So

Re: [CMake] Patch for watcom InstallRequiredSystemLibraries

2011-06-04 Thread Steven Velez
I'd like to know the same. Particularly with respect to whether any documents will need to be signed, and for how much longer patches (that aren't bug fixes) will be accepted to 2.8.5. Thanks, Steven On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 1:53 AM, J Decker wrote: > so what is the proper way for someone without