Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.4-rc2 ready for testing!

2011-01-31 Thread Dongsheng Song
On 2011-2-1 5:45, David Cole wrote: > The CMake 2.8.4 release candidate stream continues! You can find the > source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/?C=M;O=D > > Since we switched to git, and a new workflow, we're expecting to do > more frequent releases. Because of that, our rele

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.8.4-rc2 ready for testing!

2011-01-31 Thread Dongsheng Song
On 2011-2-1 5:45, David Cole wrote: > The CMake 2.8.4 release candidate stream continues! You can find the > source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/?C=M;O=D > > Since we switched to git, and a new workflow, we're expecting to do > more frequent releases. Because of that, our rele

Re: [CMake] FindTCL.cmake has a problem?

2011-01-31 Thread Clifford Yapp
It's still being developed, but you might try the version in the BRL-CAD subversion repository, cmake branch: svn co https://brlcad.svn.sf.net/svnroot/brlcad/brlcad/branches/cmake/misc/CMake brlcad_cmake I'm trying to get it as "bullet-proof" as possible, although I'm not sure how well it will do

[CMake] WG: Problems with MinGW + BundleUtilities

2011-01-31 Thread NoRulez
I had sent this email, but it wasn’t forwarded to the mailing list. Maybe the administrator could forward the email, because I had attached a tiny example (RAR archive). Best Regards Von: NoRulez [mailto:noru...@me.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 28. Jänner 2011 17:52 An: 'CMake MailingList' Betr

[CMake] CMake 2.8.4-rc2 ready for testing!

2011-01-31 Thread David Cole
The CMake 2.8.4 release candidate stream continues! You can find the source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/?C=M;O=D Since we switched to git, and a new workflow, we're expecting to do more frequent releases. Because of that, our release candidate phases will be shorter than the

Re: [CMake] Compiler definitions for shared and static builds

2011-01-31 Thread SF Markus Elfring
> I try to generate a cmake project and want to > build shared and dynamic libraries in one step. Do you know answers from a wiki? http://cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ#Can_I_build_both_shared_and_static_libraries_with_one_ADD_LIBRARY_command.3F Regards, Markus _

Re: [CMake] link against a library under windows

2011-01-31 Thread Tyler Roscoe
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 08:12:49AM +0100, ycollette.nos...@free.fr wrote: > if (MKL_FOUND) > set(LINK_PATHS ${LINK_PATHS} "${mkl_solver_PATH}") > endif (MKL_FOUND) > if (MPI_FOUND) > set(LINK_PATHS ${LINK_PATHS} "${MPI_BASE_PATH}/lib") > endif (MPI_FOUND) > > link_directories(${LINK_PATHS}) D

Re: [CMake] Compiler definitions for shared and static builds

2011-01-31 Thread Eric Noulard
2011/1/31 Andreas Pakulat : > On 31.01.11 17:18:58, Louis Hoefler wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> I try to generate a cmake project and want to >> build shared and dynamic libraries in one step. >> >> I therefore added two targets: >> ADD_LIBRARY(${fox_default_libname} STATIC ${fox_cpp_files} >> ${fox

Re: [CMake] Compiler definitions for shared and static builds

2011-01-31 Thread Andreas Pakulat
On 31.01.11 17:18:58, Louis Hoefler wrote: > Hello everyone, > I try to generate a cmake project and want to > build shared and dynamic libraries in one step. > > I therefore added two targets: > ADD_LIBRARY(${fox_default_libname} STATIC ${fox_cpp_files} > ${fox_h_files} icons.h icons.cpp) > ADD_

[CMake] FindTCL.cmake has a problem?

2011-01-31 Thread kent williams
I found this out on a RHEL6 machine, which comes stock with tclsh and wish but without the C header files for development. FindTCL.cmake sets TCL_FOUND, even though TCL_INCLUDE_PATH:PATH=TCL_INCLUDE_PATH-NOTFOUND Imagine the hilarity that ensues! ___ P

[CMake] Compiler definitions for shared and static builds

2011-01-31 Thread Louis Hoefler
Hello everyone, I try to generate a cmake project and want to build shared and dynamic libraries in one step. I therefore added two targets: ADD_LIBRARY(${fox_default_libname} STATIC ${fox_cpp_files} ${fox_h_files} icons.h icons.cpp) ADD_LIBRARY(${fox_default_libname} SHARED ${fox_cpp_files} ${

Re: [CMake] CMake without C/C++ tests

2011-01-31 Thread Дима
Thanks, tool-chain file helps me. 31.01.2011, 16:13, "Yngve Inntjore Levinsen" : > I was quite sure that you  need your project to use at least one language, > but that it does not need to be C/C++. > > If you have issues with the internal test then a special TOOLCHAIN file is > the way to go. I

Re: [CMake] CMake without C/C++ tests

2011-01-31 Thread Yngve Inntjore Levinsen
I was quite sure that you need your project to use at least one language, but that it does not need to be C/C++. If you have issues with the internal test then a special TOOLCHAIN file is the way to go. I had to do this for a special fortran compiler that only built 32bit packages on a 64bit s

Re: [CMake] CMake without C/C++ tests

2011-01-31 Thread Дима
So, I put the line project (astl "NONE") in CmakeLists.txt But it does not work, i got these messages $ cmake -DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE=/home/Void/devel/svnroot/trunk/gcc/libstdc++-v3/astl/ToolchainFile.cmake /home/Void/devel/svnroot/trunk/gcc/libstdc++-v3/astl/ -- Configuring done CMake Error: Can

[CMake] Dynamic analysis results only for broken tests?

2011-01-31 Thread Johannes Stallkamp
Hello, on our build server, I have set up CTest 2.8.-rc1 to run dynamic analysis with valgrind (3.6.0). Results are submitted to CDash 1.8.2. However, I noticed that only results with at least one error/leak show up in the dashboard. Tests that run flawlessly don't. In the DynamicAnalysis.xml, a