On 21.01.11 01:37:41, Michael Hertling wrote:
> So, what's your conclusion in this matter? Should the behavior in
> question be considered as a bug or is it alright? IMO, such a subtle
> side effect of a read operation on a subsequent write operation is at
> least highly surprising. Besides, does o
> 2011/1/20 Alexander Neundorf :
>> check_include_files() is there to check whether header files in the
>> compilers
>> system include path exist, i.e. which are found without any -I switches.
>> So, from that POV, the behaviour is ok.
>
> Aha, so software using check_include_files() to look for
Am Donnerstag, den 20.01.2011, 15:36 -0500 schrieb Brad King:
> On 01/20/2011 01:36 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Thursday 20 January 2011, Brad King wrote:
> >> This all has been documented on the Wiki for years:
> >>
> >> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_2.6_Notes
> >>
> >> It is more of
Is tha with 2.8.3 or 2.8.4-rc1?
On Thursday, January 20, 2011, wrote:
> I know I've asked this before, but now I've narrowed it down a bit and I
> have an example. This copies a *.res file to the binary directory where
> presumably the executable can find it. The executable has that file as a
>
Hi,
I had the same problem as OP. To fix, delete CMakeCache.txt in the build
dir, and run ccmake again. Phew!
BTW, is there a way to reply directly to an archived post? I just copied
the thread and subject into a new email msg, which is easy enough
actually.
Cheers,
Michael
On 01/20/2011 07:01 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Sunday 09 January 2011, Michael Hertling wrote:
>> On 01/09/2011 09:47 PM, Nizar Khalifa Sallem wrote:
>>> At Sun, 09 Jan 2011 21:42:49 +0100,
>>>
>>> Michael Hertling wrote:
On 01/09/2011 09:09 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 09.01.11
Hi Alexander,
Thanks for your reply.
2011/1/20 Alexander Neundorf :
> On Monday 10 January 2011, Bjørn Forsman wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just found out that CHECK_INCLUDE_FILES ignores CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH. The
>> documentation for CHECK_INCLUDE_FILES says:
>>
>> ...
>> The following variable
I know I've asked this before, but now I've narrowed it down a bit and I
have an example. This copies a *.res file to the binary directory where
presumably the executable can find it. The executable has that file as a
source file to hook up the dependency, and the copied file has the
HEADER_FIL
2011/1/20 Rolf Eike Beer :
>> When you have such different "levels" of option you may do something like:
>>
>> OPTION(DEVELOPER_OPT_ENABLE "Enable developer options" OFF)
>> OPTION(SYSTEM_INTEGRATOR_OPT_ENABLE "Enable system integrator
>> specific options" OFF)
>> OPTION(TOOL_USERS_OPT_ENABLE "E
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 08:38:41PM +, Marco Craveiro wrote:
> the bit i fail to understand is why is 36000 deemed as a good value
> rather than ~86400? or is this because a lot of people have copied and
> pasted from the wiki page? :-)
Since the examples come from scripts Kitware uses in produ
On 20.01.2011, at 18:37, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Thursday 20 January 2011, Michael Wild wrote:
>> On 01/20/2011 02:14 PM, David Cole wrote:
> ...
>>> Me too. I had to go searching for "CMAKE_MATCH_" because I knew it was
>>> stated somewhere. Much to my surprise, there was only a singl
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> On 1/20/2011 3:19 PM, kent williams wrote:
> > I kinda know the simple answer is 'no.' I hope there's a creative
> > *couch*sneaky*cough* way to do this.
> >
> > I'm trying to build CableSwig as a external project as part of ITK. I
> > have this
hello cmakers,
i've been parsing some of the documentation/posts etc on continuous
builds. it seems a pretty common pattern for people to settle on a while
loop such as the one described in the official wiki
(http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Scripting_Of_CTest):
while (${CTEST_ELAPSED_TIME} LESS 3
On 01/20/2011 01:36 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Thursday 20 January 2011, Brad King wrote:
>> This all has been documented on the Wiki for years:
>>
>> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_2.6_Notes
>>
>> It is more of a tutorial/reference format than an example/template though.
>
> Yes, it's
On 1/20/2011 3:19 PM, kent williams wrote:
I kinda know the simple answer is 'no.' I hope there's a creative
*couch*sneaky*cough* way to do this.
I'm trying to build CableSwig as a external project as part of ITK. I
have this working for a single-process build. It works in that case
because t
I kinda know the simple answer is 'no.' I hope there's a creative
*couch*sneaky*cough* way to do this.
I'm trying to build CableSwig as a external project as part of ITK. I
have this working for a single-process build. It works in that case
because the ExternalProject_add happens textually befo
There are a lot of different reasons it can fail. I usually end up debugging
through the fixup_bundle() code and placing lots of "message(STATUS )"
commands in order to try and follow what is going on. There are already some
through out the cmake code you usually just have to set a cmake var
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Dimitri Kaparis wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Alexander Neundorf
>
> wrote:
> > On Thursday 20 January 2011, Dimitri Kaparis wrote:
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> the Code Blocks generator is not adding to the project the sources,
> >> specified in the command.
> When you have such different "levels" of option you may do something like:
>
> OPTION(DEVELOPER_OPT_ENABLE "Enable developer options" OFF)
> OPTION(SYSTEM_INTEGRATOR_OPT_ENABLE "Enable system integrator
> specific options" OFF)
> OPTION(TOOL_USERS_OPT_ENABLE "Enable tool users options" ON)
>
>
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 02:06:33PM +0100, Michael Wild wrote:
> Ah, yes. I keep forgetting. Might I propose that the documentation about
> regular expressions be extracted into its own section and then be
> referenced from all commands that have a REGEX mode? Because,
> confusingly, the only docume
Well I do have a folder structure, which looks like this:
$ ls -R madx_dev.app/
Contents
madx_dev.app//Contents:
Info.plist MacOS Resources
madx_dev.app//Contents/MacOS:
madx_dev
madx_dev.app//Contents/Resources:
MadX.icns
But it does not seem that the fixup-command does anything for me wi
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Alexander Neundorf
wrote:
> On Thursday 20 January 2011, Dimitri Kaparis wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> the Code Blocks generator is not adding to the project the sources,
>> specified in the command.
>> In order to add a group of header files to my project tree, I'm t
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Brad King wrote:
> On 01/20/2011 12:22 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Thursday 20 January 2011, Michael Wild wrote:
> >> On 01/19/2011 07:24 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> >>> Wow, good summary.
> >>>
> >>> Can you please put that in a wiki page on
> >>> http://w
On Friday 03 December 2010, Andrea Galeazzi wrote:
> Il 03/12/2010 13.15, Michael Wild ha scritto:
> > On 12/03/2010 01:06 PM, Andrea Galeazzi wrote:
> >> How can I specify the "as" command like I do for gcc or g++ compiler in
> >> a toolchain?
> >> SET(CMAKE_C_COMPILER "C:/Programmi/development/
On 01/20/2011 12:22 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Thursday 20 January 2011, Michael Wild wrote:
>> On 01/19/2011 07:24 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>>> Wow, good summary.
>>>
>>> Can you please put that in a wiki page on http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake?
>>
>> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:H
Hi Justin,
On Tuesday 14 December 2010, Justin Holewinski wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Johan Björk wrote:
> > Hi Justin,
> >
> > I'm very unsure if this is the correct solution, but it worked for me. I
> > haven't been able to find any good documentation stating how the
> > CMakeCach
On Monday 10 January 2011, Emmanuel Blot wrote:
> >> INCLUDE (CMakeForceCompiler)
> >> CMAKE_FORCE_C_COMPILER (arm-eabi-gcc-4.5.2 GNU 4)
> >
> > I haven't used that one before.
>
> FWIW: I found why I use CMAKE_FORCE_C_COMPILER rather than the simpler
> CMAKE_C_COMPILER command:
> I build projects
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > On Thursday 20 January 2011, James Bigler wrote:
> > > I'm noticing that on some systems they package the NVIDIA driver into
> > > different directories than the driver is typically installed. In
> > > order to make stuff link properly
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Alexander Neundorf
wrote:
> On Thursday 20 January 2011, Michael Wild wrote:
>> On 01/20/2011 02:14 PM, David Cole wrote:
> ...
>> > Me too. I had to go searching for "CMAKE_MATCH_" because I knew it was
>> > stated somewhere. Much to my surprise, there was only a
On Monday 10 January 2011, Bjørn Forsman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just found out that CHECK_INCLUDE_FILES ignores CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH. The
> documentation for CHECK_INCLUDE_FILES says:
>
> ...
> The following variables may be set before calling this macro to
> modify the way the check is run:
On Sunday 09 January 2011, Michael Hertling wrote:
> On 01/09/2011 09:47 PM, Nizar Khalifa Sallem wrote:
> > At Sun, 09 Jan 2011 21:42:49 +0100,
> >
> > Michael Hertling wrote:
> >> On 01/09/2011 09:09 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> >>> On 09.01.11 21:05:21, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 09.01.11
> On Thursday 20 January 2011, James Bigler wrote:
> > I'm noticing that on some systems they package the NVIDIA driver into
> > different directories than the driver is typically installed. In
> > order to make stuff link properly at run time these non-standard
> > locations are added to /etc/ld
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Michael Wild wrote:
> On 01/20/2011 02:14 PM, David Cole wrote:
...
> > Me too. I had to go searching for "CMAKE_MATCH_" because I knew it was
> > stated somewhere. Much to my surprise, there was only a single
> > "CMAKE_MATCH" on our whole documentation page. It would
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Dimitri Kaparis wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> the Code Blocks generator is not adding to the project the sources,
> specified in the command.
> In order to add a group of header files to my project tree, I'm trying
> to implement the solution posted here:
> http://www.cmake.o
On Thursday 20 January 2011, James Bigler wrote:
> I'm noticing that on some systems they package the NVIDIA driver into
> different directories than the driver is typically installed. In order to
> make stuff link properly at run time these non-standard locations are added
> to /etc/ld.so.conf.d.
On Thursday 20 January 2011, Michael Wild wrote:
> On 01/19/2011 07:24 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Thursday 30 December 2010, Michael Wild wrote:
> >> On 12/30/2010 11:33 AM, Ian Monroe wrote:
> >>> To create my QyotoConfig.cmake I need to know the full path of a
> >>> library so that I ca
2011/1/20 SF Markus Elfring :
>> Probably that would be pretty difficult to achieve and definitely would
>> break backwards-compatibility beyond resurrection.
>
> I have got a different opinion. I imagine that a property with a new name
> can provide the desired service to retrieve target parameter
On 01/20/2011 04:30 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> Probably that would be pretty difficult to achieve and definitely would
>> break backwards-compatibility beyond resurrection.
>
> I have got a different opinion. I imagine that a property with a new
> name can provide the desired service to retri
On 01/19/2011 07:24 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Thursday 30 December 2010, Michael Wild wrote:
>> On 12/30/2010 11:33 AM, Ian Monroe wrote:
>>> To create my QyotoConfig.cmake I need to know the full path of a
>>> library so that I can set a variable like QYOTO_LIBRARY.
>>>
>>> This is pretty
Probably that would be pretty difficult to achieve and definitely would
break backwards-compatibility beyond resurrection.
I have got a different opinion. I imagine that a property with a new name can
provide the desired service to retrieve target parameters in a portable way from
the build en
If you are creating a command line program then the included fixup_bundle will
not work since it looks for a ".app" folder structure to fix. Instead you
probably want to pass in the path to the executable located in
${CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX}/bin/MyExecutable to BundleUtilities.
Any library locat
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
> On 01/20/2011 02:01 PM, David Cole wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
> >
> >> On 01/20/2011 12:10 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> Thanks for your help to make CMake better,
> >>>
> >>> Is the command variant
On 01/20/2011 02:14 PM, David Cole wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
>
>> On 01/20/2011 02:01 PM, David Cole wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
>>>
On 01/20/2011 12:10 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> Thanks for your help to make C
On 01/20/2011 02:01 PM, David Cole wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
>
>> On 01/20/2011 12:10 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
Thanks for your help to make CMake better,
>>>
>>> Is the command variant "string(REGEX REPLACE ...)" completely documented?
>>>
>>> Can mult
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
> On 01/20/2011 12:10 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Thanks for your help to make CMake better,
> >
> > Is the command variant "string(REGEX REPLACE ...)" completely documented?
> >
> > Can multiple variables be specified that will receive t
On 01/20/2011 01:30 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> get_directory_property(info COMPILE_DEFINITIONS)
>
> How do you think about an extension for this programming interface?
>
> Would you like to support that target parameters like preprocessor
> symbols are queried from the build environment even
On 01/20/2011 12:10 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> Thanks for your help to make CMake better,
>
> Is the command variant "string(REGEX REPLACE ...)" completely documented?
>
> Can multiple variables be specified that will receive the data from the
> evaluation of subexpressions in the passed reg
get_directory_property(info COMPILE_DEFINITIONS)
How do you think about an extension for this programming interface?
Would you like to support that target parameters like preprocessor symbols are
queried from the build environment even if they were not set by the CMake
command "add_definition
Thank you for your kind reply Michael, it got me some bit further and I
think I understand a bit more. I could not see any examples of the usage
of the BundleUtilities in CMake, but the example given in the Wiki works
as expected on my machine.
I forgot to add some significant parts of my CMak
Thanks for your help to make CMake better,
Is the command variant "string(REGEX REPLACE ...)" completely documented?
Can multiple variables be specified that will receive the data from the
evaluation of subexpressions in the passed regular expression?
Regards,
Markus
Thanks for your help to make CMake better,
How many CMake commands can work with subexpressions in regular expressions?
Are any extensions needed in this application area?
Regards,
Markus
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-sourc
Hello,
I meet some problems to run cmake with intel fortran 11.1 + visual 2008 under
windows XP 64 bits.
I can compile a fortran project under visual, but cmake is not able to detect
ifort (I run cmake from the visual dos console).
The log of a cmake run is joined to this mail.
I wanted to open
52 matches
Mail list logo
