Re: [CMake] sip, pyqt, and linking

On 12/09/2010 12:08 AM, luxInteg wrote: > Greetings > > consider my small 'learn cmake/qt4 project' > It generates a library testLIB-static in $CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/testLIB > and an executible testBIN in ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/upstream/bin > > > A) For the library I used > add_library(test

Re: [CMake] Did anyone manage to get incremental linking working with NMake generator?

On 12/8/2010 10:18 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote: On 12/8/2010 4:21 PM, Gabriel Petrovay wrote: Yes I did. That is why I am wrote this post. Regardless of previous build. I always get: LINK : examples.exe not found or not built by the last incremental link; performing full link Try a make VERBOSE=1

Re: [CMake] Did anyone manage to get incremental linking working with NMake generator?

On 12/8/2010 4:21 PM, Gabriel Petrovay wrote: Yes I did. That is why I am wrote this post. Regardless of previous build. I always get: LINK : examples.exe not found or not built by the last incremental link; performing full link Try a make VERBOSE=1 with the /incremental:yes on, and post the r

[CMake] Platform differences for ExternalProject_add URL

[resending since the original seems to have never made it to the list.] I'm using ExternalProject_add in a script that builds various libraries I depend on, and I'm running into platform differences when attempting to download a source archive from a sourceforge URL. Sounds like a bug to me.

Re: [CMake] cmake PyQT/SIP

On Sunday 05 December 2010 13:51:12 Michael Wild wrote: > On 12/05/2010 02:04 AM, luxInteg wrote: > > On Thursday 02 December 2010 07:48:55 Michael Wild wrote: > Use ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND. > >>> > >>> @Michael: that advice is not correct. add_custom_command sets up a > >>> command to be run at

[CMake] sip, pyqt, and linking

Greetings consider my small 'learn cmake/qt4 project' It generates a library testLIB-static in $CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/testLIB and an executible testBIN in ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/upstream/bin A) For the library I used add_library(testLIB-statictestLIB.cpp ) B) For the executible I use

Re: [CMake] Need some directions for non-trivial setup

Thanks it's more clear. >From what I read in the documentation, if I have a "tools" directory with one directory by tool project, I'll need to add_subdirectory() for each tool project, right? I'll try to us that in my main repo that have to know the projects anyway. On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 17:20,

Re: [CMake] Did anyone manage to get incremental linking working with NMake generator?

Yes I did. That is why I am wrote this post. Regardless of previous build. I always get: LINK : examples.exe not found or not built by the last incremental link; performing full link On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:09 PM, John Drescher wrote: >> Providing /INCREMENTAL:YES VS2010 linker complains that

Re: [CMake] Did anyone manage to get incremental linking working with NMake generator?

> Providing /INCREMENTAL:YES VS2010 linker complains that this is > deprecated and still does a FULL link. > This is normal behavior in Visual Studio for the first build since there was no previous full. Did you try modifying a file after it built and building again without cleaning? John

Re: [CMake] Did anyone manage to get incremental linking working with NMake generator?

see inline On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote: > On 12/8/2010 2:28 PM, Gabriel Petrovay wrote: >> >> What does "Visual Studio Non-Incremental Link" mean in the below output? >> In the link command below you can see the /INCREMENTAL /DUMMY options. >> I explicitly added them now bu

Re: [CMake] Did anyone manage to get incremental linking working with NMake generator?

On 12/8/2010 2:28 PM, Gabriel Petrovay wrote: What does "Visual Studio Non-Incremental Link" mean in the below output? In the link command below you can see the /INCREMENTAL /DUMMY options. I explicitly added them now but still the same behaviour: It means what it says. It means it is doing a n

Re: [CMake] Did anyone manage to get incremental linking working with NMake generator?

What does "Visual Studio Non-Incremental Link" mean in the below output? In the link command below you can see the /INCREMENTAL /DUMMY options. I explicitly added them now but still the same behaviour: What can it be the problem that I still get: LINK : updtestdriver.exe not found or not built by

Re: [CMake] Did anyone manage to get incremental linking working with NMake generator?

On 12/8/2010 1:49 PM, Gabriel Petrovay wrote: On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote: On 12/8/2010 12:53 PM, Gabriel Petrovay wrote: Hi Bill, First just by running "cmake -E vs_link_exe" CMake crashes on my machine (CMake 2.8.2, Win7): "cmake.exe stopped working" "Close the progr

Re: [CMake] Did anyone manage to get incremental linking working with NMake generator?

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote: > On 12/8/2010 12:53 PM, Gabriel Petrovay wrote: >> >> Hi Bill, >> >> First just by running "cmake -E vs_link_exe" CMake crashes on my >> machine (CMake 2.8.2, Win7): "cmake.exe stopped working" "Close the >> program/Debug the program". Is this t

Re: [CMake] Did anyone manage to get incremental linking working with NMake generator?

On 12/8/2010 12:53 PM, Gabriel Petrovay wrote: Hi Bill, First just by running "cmake -E vs_link_exe" CMake crashes on my machine (CMake 2.8.2, Win7): "cmake.exe stopped working" "Close the program/Debug the program". Is this the right behaviour? It is not meant to be a command that is called by

Re: [CMake] Did anyone manage to get incremental linking working with NMake generator?

Hi Bill, First just by running "cmake -E vs_link_exe" CMake crashes on my machine (CMake 2.8.2, Win7): "cmake.exe stopped working" "Close the program/Debug the program". Is this the right behaviour? Then, below is my verbose output. I see no /INCREMENTAL:YES in my link command. How did you get th

Re: [CMake] Did anyone manage to get incremental linking working with NMake generator?

On 12/8/2010 10:36 AM, Gabriel Petrovay wrote: Hi, Does anyone have some experience with the NMake generator and with incremental linking. There seems to be a bug in CMake. Currently NMake generator seems to generate build files that are not compatible with incremental linking of libraries. I p

Re: [CMake] Dependency rule not included

On 12/08/2010 04:28 PM, Vivien Delmon wrote: > On 12/08/2010 04:13 PM, Michael Wild wrote: >> On 12/08/2010 03:54 PM, Micha Renner wrote: >>> Am Mittwoch, den 08.12.2010, 14:55 +0100 schrieb Vivien Delmon: CMAKE_MINIMUM_REQUIRED(VERSION 2.8) ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND(OUTPUT toto.h toto.c

Re: [CMake] Need some directions for non-trivial setup

Every "project(...)" command in a CMakeLists.txt file (we expect at most one in any given CMakeLists.txt file) results in a *.sln file being generated for use with Visual Studio. Every add_library(...), add_executable(...) and add_custom_target(...) results in a *.vcproj or *.vcxproj file being ge

Re: [CMake] Need some directions for non-trivial setup

Sorry, I really wouldn't know, I do development on Linux. My knowledge of MS Visual Studio is negligible. On a general note, though, CMake uses a so-called generator to generate the Visual Studio project files, as it can also generate Unix Makefiles, or KDevelop project files. Maybe you should s

Re: [CMake] Dependency rule not included

On 12/08/2010 04:50 PM, Michael Wild wrote: On 12/08/2010 04:28 PM, Vivien Delmon wrote: On 12/08/2010 04:13 PM, Michael Wild wrote: On 12/08/2010 03:54 PM, Micha Renner wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 08.12.2010, 14:55 +0100 schrieb Vivien Delmon: CMAKE_MINIMUM_REQUIRED(VERSION 2.8) ADD_CUSTOM_COMMA

Re: [CMake] Need some directions for non-trivial setup

Sorry, a part of my sentence got cut : I don't understand what makes, for example, the CLang project generate different projects in the Visual Studio solution generated depending on the project folder content in LLVM repo. Or maybe it's automatic because Cmake will scan all the subfolders of fold

Re: [CMake] Need some directions for non-trivial setup

Yeah I was meaning in the context of a CMake script. I don't understand what makes, for example, the CLang project generate different projects in the solution folder depending on the project folder content in LLVM repo? Or maybe it's automatic because Cmake will scan all the subfolders of folders w

Re: [CMake] Dependency rule not included

On 12/08/2010 04:28 PM, Vivien Delmon wrote: > On 12/08/2010 04:13 PM, Michael Wild wrote: >> On 12/08/2010 03:54 PM, Micha Renner wrote: >>> Am Mittwoch, den 08.12.2010, 14:55 +0100 schrieb Vivien Delmon: CMAKE_MINIMUM_REQUIRED(VERSION 2.8) ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND(OUTPUT toto.h toto.c

Re: [CMake] Need some directions for non-trivial setup

>>> On 8-12-2010 at 11:41, in message , Klaim wrote: > Thanks! I'll try this solution. > > By the way is there a way to list all projects found recursively in a > folder? Not that I know of. You can of course do a grep, but that's probably not what you mean. Regards, Marcel. _

[CMake] Did anyone manage to get incremental linking working with NMake generator?

Hi, Does anyone have some experience with the NMake generator and with incremental linking. There seems to be a bug in CMake. Currently NMake generator seems to generate build files that are not compatible with incremental linking of libraries. I posted the details here: http://www.cmake.org/pipe

Re: [CMake] Dependency rule not included

On 12/08/2010 04:13 PM, Michael Wild wrote: On 12/08/2010 03:54 PM, Micha Renner wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 08.12.2010, 14:55 +0100 schrieb Vivien Delmon: CMAKE_MINIMUM_REQUIRED(VERSION 2.8) ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND(OUTPUT toto.h toto.c COMMAND ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/create_totoc_totoh.sh ) S

Re: [CMake] Dependency rule not included

On 12/08/2010 03:54 PM, Micha Renner wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 08.12.2010, 14:55 +0100 schrieb Vivien Delmon: >> CMAKE_MINIMUM_REQUIRED(VERSION 2.8) >> ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND(OUTPUT toto.h toto.c >> COMMAND ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/create_totoc_totoh.sh >> ) > SET_SOURCE_FILES_PROPERTIES(toto.h

Re: [CMake] Dependency rule not included

Am Mittwoch, den 08.12.2010, 14:55 +0100 schrieb Vivien Delmon: > CMAKE_MINIMUM_REQUIRED(VERSION 2.8) > ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND(OUTPUT toto.h toto.c > COMMAND ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/create_totoc_totoh.sh > ) SET_SOURCE_FILES_PROPERTIES(toto.h toto.c PROPERTIES GENERATETED TRUE) See: http://www

[CMake] Dependency rule not included

Hi all, I have a problem with cmake and I did not find how to solve it in the documentation. My problem is that I have a custom_command that generate a C file and a H file. If I add another C file in a library that needs the H file (like #include "h") it doesn't know how to generate it.

Re: [CMake] Linking archives in a sibling directory

On 12/03/2010 04:26 PM, Raymond Wan wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Thank you for your continued advice! > > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 19:13, Michael Hertling wrote: >> Nevertheless, I wonder why you want to build "main" by configuring its >> own source directory and alternatively via the top-level dir

Re: [CMake] Need some directions for non-trivial setup

Thanks! I'll try this solution. By the way is there a way to list all projects found recursively in a folder? On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:20, Marcel Loose wrote: > information about XXX availabe to CMak ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitwar

Re: [CMake] CPACK on windows

Hi, Thanks you for the answer, Actually i choose to not alterate the NSIS.template.in file. I perfer adding my own custom commands that will modify the project.nsi file used to generate the installer : Here is what i did to custom my cpack installer, it may help someone... To create a sub-

Re: [CMake] Need some directions for non-trivial setup

>>> On 7-12-2010 at 11:59, in message , Klaim wrote: >> >> I would try to start with just one (base-)project, try to get >> everything in place and building the way you want it. If you're new to >> CMake, that's really the way to go. Once you have this base-project >> ready, you can think of sta