Re: [CMake] Bug fix requests for the *next* release of CMake...

On 07/11/2010 21.01, Philip Lowman wrote: On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Luigi Calori > wrote: +1 for FindBoost support to "CMakeified" version of Boost at "http://gitorious.org/~denisarnaud/boost/denisarnauds-zeuners-boost-cmake/commits/1.44.0-denis

Re: [CMake] Bug fix requests for the *next* release of CMake...

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Adam J Richardson wrote: > Could you guys have a chat with the Boost guys and fix the "future > safety" of FindBoost.cmake somehow? Fiddling with ADDITIONAL_VERSIONS > is really a pain on a build farm. > To implement this I think we would need wildcat version searc

Re: [CMake] Bug fix requests for the *next* release of CMake...

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Luigi Calori wrote: > +1 for FindBoost support to "CMakeified" version of Boost at " >> http://gitorious.org/~denisarnaud/boost/denisarnauds-zeuners-boost-cmake/commits/1.44.0-denis >> ": > > Luigi, Does the "CMakeified" version of Boost still not produce build o

Re: [CMake] Is there a tool pretty much like cmake for Java?

On Monday, November 01, 2010 17:18:53 Michał Czuczman wrote: > On 10/22/2010 10:58 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 04:45:42PM -0400, Ben Boeckel forgot to attach > > files > > > > Actually attaching things now. > > > > --Ben > > This is still not a perfect solution. > > > 1

Re: [CMake] cmake my_BouncyBall

On Sunday 07 November 2010 11:34:47 Richard Wackerbarth wrote: > First let me suggest that you word your request in a more complete manner. > What "does not work"? cant get an executable generated because the 'COMMAND' syntax is incorrect" so could you suggest the correct syntax please? > What

Re: [CMake] cmake my_BouncyBall

First let me suggest that you word your request in a more complete manner. What "does not work"? What were you expecting and what did you get? It is difficult, if not impossible, for us to guess. I suspect that the problem is related to the ">" (specifying the output file in Unix). Are you on a U

[CMake] cmake my_BouncyBall

Greetings, I am learning cmake. and I have taken the following from an old Makefile:- INC = ../include/BouncyBall.h BouncyBall: BouncyBall.c library $(INC) ${CC} ${CFLAGS} -o BouncyBall BouncyBall.c ../lib/libOLD.a ./BouncyBall > my_BouncyBall.out - diff BouncyBall.out my_Bou

Re: [CMake] cmake gfortran-libs linking x86_64

On Sunday 07 November 2010 11:00:03 Eric Noulard wrote: > enable_language(Fortran) > > for mixed language programming you have the > FortranCInterface cmake module: > http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/cmake-2-8-docs.html#module:FortranCInterfac > e > > If you search the ML archive you will find m

Re: [CMake] cmake gfortran-libs linking x86_64

2010/11/7 luxInteg : > Greetings, > > > > I am learning cmake   I have the following gfortran libraries on my computer:- > > rt [ ~ ]$ > rt [ ~ ]$ ls -l  /usr/lib/*gfortran* > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8489924 Jul 27 12:19 /usr/lib/libgfortran.a > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root     952 Jul 27 12:19 /usr/lib/l

Re: [CMake] call already made makefile

On 11/06/2010 07:10 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > On 2010-11-05 22:50-0700 SK wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Alan W. Irwin >> wrote: >>> I agree the above idea should work, but dropping add_custom_command >>> completely and moving the COMMAND to add_custom_target instead (and >>> dropp

Re: [CMake] CMAKE way to get leaf of file path

On 11/07/2010 02:07 AM, Russell L. Carter wrote: > > Hi there, > Happy cmake user here. I want to retrieve the leaf name of > the directory property "PARENT_DIRECTORY". This is really > a more general cmake question: how do I most efficiently > manipulate path components of the absolute pathnam

[CMake] cmake gfortran-libs linking x86_64

Greetings, I am learning cmake I have the following gfortran libraries on my computer:- rt [ ~ ]$ rt [ ~ ]$ ls -l /usr/lib/*gfortran* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8489924 Jul 27 12:19 /usr/lib/libgfortran.a -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 952 Jul 27 12:19 /usr/lib/libgfortran.la lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root