Re: [CMake] Less Noisy Makefiles?

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:55 PM, David Cole wrote: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Campbell Barton > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Campbell Barton >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Michael Wild wrote: >> >> >> >> On 7. Oct, 2010, at 11:58 , Campbell Barton wrote: >

[CMake] Can not found CMAKE_C_COMPILER after upgrading to v2.8 on Cygwin

Hi, I used to use CMake v2.6 on Cygwin-1.7 to build codes for MIPS. It works well and my scripts like: - CMakeLists.txt start - CMAKE_MINIMUM_REQUIRED(VERSION 2.6) INCLUDE(CMakeForceCompiler) SET(CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME Generic) # specify the cross compiler CMAKE_FORCE_C_COMPILER(/cygdrive/c

[CMake] Why drop -D from wxWidgets_DEFINITIONS ?

Hi, The FindwxWidget.cmake module in 2.8 is breaking the build of MRIConvert [1] because it strips "-D" from the output of "wx-config --cxxflags". Is this not a bug? This question was asked here last October [2] but not answered. Thanks, -Steve [1] http://lcni.uoregon.edu/~jolinda/MRIConvert

Re: [CMake] How to determine the number of processors available from CMake code

Thanks! On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Mark Moll wrote: > On OS X, this command might be easier / faster: > > sysctl -n hw.ncpu > > On Oct 7, 2010, at 3:50 PM, David Cole wrote: > > > I just posted a short blog article demonstrating how to figure out the > number of processors available for a "

Re: [CMake] Less Noisy Makefiles?

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Campbell Barton wrote: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Campbell Barton > wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Michael Wild wrote: > >> > >> On 7. Oct, 2010, at 11:58 , Campbell Barton wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, I was wondering if this is possible or if it woul

Re: [CMake] how to get cmake and custom qt widget to work?

tried that, no go On Tue 05 Oct 21:44 2010 John Drescher wrote: > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:41 PM, e...@cs.bgu.ac.il wrote: > > nope, like I wrote in the first post, I need a string spinbox so I've > > extended qspinbox to support strings. > > that is the custom widget in question. > > > > You n

Re: [CMake] Less Noisy Makefiles?

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Campbell Barton wrote: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Michael Wild wrote: >> >> On 7. Oct, 2010, at 11:58 , Campbell Barton wrote: >> >>> Hi, I was wondering if this is possible or if it would be acceptable >>> to disable progress printout. >>> >>> At the momen

Re: [CMake] Disallowing in-source builds

I'd rather make it as hard as possible to form bad habits. It would also be helpful to me. I've moved to the console and typed "cmake ." several times thinking I was in the build directory, and then cussed quite a bit while digging through removing cruft. (Points on Version Control taken, I'll

[CMake] How to determine the number of processors available from CMake code

I just posted a short blog article demonstrating how to figure out the number of processors available for a "make -j" or a scripted ctest_build call (with the "Unix Makefiles" generator) on Linux, Mac and Windows. Please let me know if you have any ideas for how it might be improved or extended. h

Re: [CMake] Is there a tool pretty much like cmake for Java?

On Thursday 07 October 2010 21:32:51 Bill Hoffman wrote: > The other issue is VS builds. At one point, I had some magic, cmake > language to custom command converter thing going for this, but I am > thinking it might be broken. If we did a pure custom-command version, > it would work in the IDE'

Re: [CMake] Is there a tool pretty much like cmake for Java?

On 10/7/2010 2:37 PM, Andreas Schneider wrote: On Thursday 07 October 2010 18:57:50 Bill Hoffman wrote: The java support was broken a while ago when we re-organized the build trees. I don't have much time to work on this, but I would like to get it fixed. The best approach might be a pure cus

Re: [CMake] Is there a tool pretty much like cmake for Java?

On Thursday 07 October 2010 18:57:50 Bill Hoffman wrote: > The java support was broken a while ago when we re-organized the build > trees. I don't have much time to work on this, but I would like to get > it fixed. The best approach might be a pure custom command approach. Hi Bill, with some m

Re: [CMake] Disallowing in-source builds

You could try, though it makes my brain hurt to think about it. Why go to such lengths to protect users from themselves? On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:57 AM, wrote: > Yeah, I think I'll go with something like what you are saying.  I wonder > if I can remove the CMakeFiles directory and the CMakeCac

Re: [CMake] Is there a tool pretty much like cmake for Java?

On 10/7/2010 12:37 PM, Ryan Pavlik wrote: On 10/07/2010 09:57 AM, Andreas Schneider wrote: On Thursday 07 October 2010 16:45:49 Andreas Schneider wrote: My current problem is with javah (C header file generator). This generator works on the class files. The class files aren't in CMAKE_CURRENT

Re: [CMake] Disallowing in-source builds

Yeah, I think I'll go with something like what you are saying. I wonder if I can remove the CMakeFiles directory and the CMakeCache.txt file from within the CMakeLists script... Aaron C. Meadows > Hi all. > > > > Is there a good way to disallow in-source builds? Ideally, I'd like to > prev

Re: [CMake] Is there a tool pretty much like cmake for Java?

On 10/07/2010 09:57 AM, Andreas Schneider wrote: On Thursday 07 October 2010 16:45:49 Andreas Schneider wrote: My current problem is with javah (C header file generator). This generator works on the class files. The class files aren't in CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR they are located in: ${CMAKE_C

Re: [CMake] How would I use parallel make on ExternalProjects?

On 10/7/2010 12:13 PM, kent williams wrote: On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Bill Hoffman wrote: What you want is for make to treat the external projects just like any other library or executable in a build. so, if you run this at the top of the build: make -j4 It should run at most 4 concu

Re: [CMake] How would I use parallel make on ExternalProjects?

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Bill Hoffman wrote: > > What you want is for make to treat the external projects just like any other > library or executable in a build. > > so, if you run this at the top of the build: > > make -j4 > > It should run at most 4 concurrent things at once for the whol

Re: [CMake] How would I use parallel make on ExternalProjects?

On 10/7/2010 11:52 AM, kent williams wrote: 1. Is that $(MAKE) or is it ${MAKE} ? One thing missing from the CMake documentation -- unless I'm mistaken there's not much explanation of CMake syntax in the documentation. No, this is make syntax not CMake syntax. 2. I think it's probably not wha

Re: [CMake] How would I use parallel make on ExternalProjects?

On the other hand, with Visual Studio, it's all a big hairy mess. because the setting for "how many parallel projects to build simultaneously" is a single top level global setting. So when we spawn sub-VS instances in VS 2008, for example, each one uses "N" for its parallel setting. In that ca

Re: [CMake] How would I use parallel make on ExternalProjects?

If you use "$(MAKE)" in a BUILD_COMMAND, then the literal "$(MAKE)" appears in the generated makefiles. That tells the top level make to spawn sub-makes with the job controller from the top level make. Then you do not need to specify any -j flags anywhere except at the top level. And then, the t

Re: [CMake] How would I use parallel make on ExternalProjects?

1. Is that $(MAKE) or is it ${MAKE} ? One thing missing from the CMake documentation -- unless I'm mistaken there's not much explanation of CMake syntax in the documentation. 2. I think it's probably not what one intends to have 'make -j4' (for example) used every time make is invoked. If you co

Re: [CMake] How would I use parallel make on ExternalProjects?

On 10/7/2010 11:25 AM, kent williams wrote: On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Clifford Yapp wrote: I use $(MAKE) in my BUILD_COMMAND and that seems to do OK, although I don't know if it works universally. That's an environment variable, as near as I can tell and isn't mentioned in the current

Re: [CMake] How would I use parallel make on ExternalProjects?

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Clifford Yapp wrote: > I use $(MAKE) in my BUILD_COMMAND and that seems to do OK, although I > don't know if it works universally. > That's an environment variable, as near as I can tell and isn't mentioned in the current CMake documentation. So it's probably not t

Re: [CMake] Is there a tool pretty much like cmake for Java?

On Thursday 07 October 2010 16:45:49 Andreas Schneider wrote: > My current problem is with javah (C header file generator). This generator > works on the class files. The class files aren't in > CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR they are located in: > > ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/CMakeFiles/.dir///foo > b

Re: [CMake] Is there a tool pretty much like cmake for Java?

On Sunday 22 August 2010 22:11:28 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > CMake "supports" Java, but that support is ... needs some work, there are > some issues (I think this had to do with the location of the compiled > files and the java packages or something). > I assume patches to improve the situation wo

Re: [CMake] Disallowing in-source builds

Two things: You should have your source code under version control, for many reasons, but in this context: 1. The VC system can tell you which files are unknown to it, i.e. those CMake pooped all over your source tree. 2. You can make sure your work is checked in, then delete the source directory

Re: [CMake] Disallowing in-source builds

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Michael Wild wrote: > > On 6. Oct, 2010, at 20:10 , < > aaron.mead...@thomsonreuters.com> wrote: > > > Hi all. > > > > > > > > Is there a good way to disallow in-source builds? Ideally, I'd like to > > prevent it before any cruft is written into the source tree.

Re: [CMake] CMake rebuilding too much

On 10/7/2010 8:21 AM, Thomas Sondergaard wrote: I've got a reasonably big project with 30+ shared libraries and 70+ executables all in one cmake-based project. Today I changed one line in a CMakeLists.txt in a sub-directory to link boost program_options in one particular executable, and it caused

[CMake] CMake rebuilding too much

I've got a reasonably big project with 30+ shared libraries and 70+ executables all in one cmake-based project. Today I changed one line in a CMakeLists.txt in a sub-directory to link boost program_options in one particular executable, and it caused cmake to decide that it needed to recompile e

Re: [CMake] avoiding building test targets

On 10/07/2010 11:28 AM, Michael Wild wrote: > function(add_test_executable name) > add_executable(${name} EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL ${ARGN}) > if(NOT TARGET test-exes) > add_custom_target(test-exes) > endif() > add_dependencies(test-exes ${name}) > endfunction() > > add_custom_target(check >

[CMake] visual studio 2010 and assembler files

Hi,I've tried to include assembler-files in one of my projects and with the masm-rule I have included the sourcefiles like normal c++-files in my library and enabled masm-support. But when I generate the visual studio 2010 solution the files are included without a custom command to compile the f

Re: [CMake] Less Noisy Makefiles?

On 7. Oct, 2010, at 11:58 , Campbell Barton wrote: > Hi, I was wondering if this is possible or if it would be acceptable > to disable progress printout. > > At the moment building with only minor changes prints a lot of text > with CMake & Makefiles. > > eg: > [ 4%] Built target bf_intern_aud

[CMake] Less Noisy Makefiles?

Hi, I was wondering if this is possible or if it would be acceptable to disable progress printout. At the moment building with only minor changes prints a lot of text with CMake & Makefiles. eg: [ 4%] Built target bf_intern_audaspace [ 4%] Built target bf_intern_string [ 6%] Built target bf_in

Re: [CMake] Disallowing in-source builds

On 07/10/10 10:21, fat...@crackmonkey.us wrote: Then, to clear all CMake debris: rm -r projectx/cmake/* On Unix, if a project is managed by SVN it's easy to clean tree from generated files: $ svn-clean Distributed with Debian, Ubuntu, etc. as well as downloadable [1] I'm sure there are sim

Re: [CMake] avoiding building test targets

On 7. Oct, 2010, at 10:54 , edA-qa mort-ora-y wrote: > How can I have CMake not build test targets when doing a "make install"? > > I'd prefer that test targets are only ever built if "make test" is called. > > -- > edA-qa mort-ora-y That needs a bit of trickery: function(add_test_executable

[CMake] Disallowing in-source builds

> > is there an easy way to clean out a source tree if an in-source > > build was accidentally kicked off? (short of dividing the files by > > their timestamp and removing the newer ones, etc..) My immediate thought was, does "make clean" not work for you? But I guess you're talking about CMake d

[CMake] avoiding building test targets

How can I have CMake not build test targets when doing a "make install"? I'd prefer that test targets are only ever built if "make test" is called. -- edA-qa mort-ora-y -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- BigTPoker - Poker fun and games

[CMake] bug in FindwxWidget.cmake (patch proposed)

Hi all, As mentioned in my previous post, there is a bug in the cmake module FindwxWidgets.cmake that prevents any library using wxWidgets to cross compile for Windows from Linux. Lines 192 to 198 are concerned by this bug: IF(WIN32 AND NOT CYGWIN AND NOT MSYS) SET(wxWidgets_FIND_STYLE "win32")

Re: [CMake] Disallowing in-source builds

On 6. Oct, 2010, at 20:10 , wrote: > Hi all. > > > > Is there a good way to disallow in-source builds? Ideally, I'd like to > prevent it before any cruft is written into the source tree. I > experimented with writing a function into my CMakelists file and calling > it. The function check

Re: [CMake] Help tracking down a problem

On 7. Oct, 2010, at 4:58 , Travis Jensen wrote: > I'm trying to build a project using cmake (firebreath). I am stuck at a > particular point (details later). I can build other projects without > running into this problem. Other people can build firebreath without > running into this problem.