[CMake] Is there a tool pretty much like cmake for Java?

2010-08-20 Thread Mr Shore
Hi there The best building tool for Java I know so far seems to be maven, but it still doesn't give so much flexibility as cmake at all! Anyone knows a cmake-alike tool for java? ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects

Re: [CMake] Creating custom file before building/compiling with cmake

2010-08-20 Thread Michael Hertling
On 08/20/2010 12:42 PM, Michael Wild wrote: > > On 19. Aug, 2010, at 23:36 , Michael Hertling wrote: > >> On 08/19/2010 09:42 PM, Michael Wild wrote: >>> >>> In that case I recommend creating a CMake script (e.g. >>> create_application_version.cmake) which creates the ApplicationVersion.xml >>>

Re: [CMake] Windows debugger command project settings

2010-08-20 Thread Ryan Pavlik
You might consider using my CreateLaunchers cmake module that will set up the debugger for you to add whatever directories you like to the PATH (on windows) so that it can find the dynamic libraries. I haven't tried it in the case that the libraries are built in the same project - you'd proba

[CMake] Problem with CTest and configuration specific binary paths

2010-08-20 Thread Iman Brouwer
Hello, The path to a binary target built by cmake depends on the configuration type when using the Visual Studio generators. Is it possible to pass this path the ctest without having to run ctest with the -c option? I'd like to do the following: I create an executable with cmake as follows, and a

[CMake] Windows debugger command project settings

2010-08-20 Thread Knox, Kent
My current codebase produces an executable with several dynamically linked libraries. I can't step through the code under the debugger until I've built the 'install' project, which copies all the binaries into the same output directory; they then can find each other. Of course, at this point I

[CMake] Ralph Barth/AEH/DBS/GDB ist außer Haus .

2010-08-20 Thread Ralph . Barth
Ralph Barth will be out of the office starting 20.08.2010 and will be returning on 24.08.2010. Ich werde Ihre Nachrichten nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. Deutsche Börse Systems AG Chairman of the Supervisory Board/

[CMake] TRY_COMPILE and -Werror

2010-08-20 Thread Arnaud GELAS
Hi all, I would like to check if one piece of code generates a warning or not (about a deprecated method). I want to use TRY_COMPILE and adds -Werror to gcc flags. I have tried the following: TRY_COMPILE(VTK_FFMPEG_GUESSFORMAT ${VTK_BINARY_DIR}/CMakeTmp ${VTK_CMAKE_DIR}/vt

[CMake] try_run understanding.

2010-08-20 Thread Ricardo Tiago
Hi all, How can I use try_run with multiple source files? Something like: gcc foo.c foo_fn.c -o newfoo So far I've came up with the following.. try_run (RUN_RESULT_VAR COMPILE_RESULT_VAR ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR} ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/foodir/foo.c CMAKE_FLAG

Re: [CMake] BundleUtilities naming and easing packaging

2010-08-20 Thread David Cole
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Mike McQuaid wrote: > > On 20 Aug 2010, at 13:09, David Cole wrote: > > > Sorry about that. The name was chosen when the functionality was > Mac-only, then we extended it to cover Windows/Linux. What name would you > suggest as "more discoverable" or "better"? > >

Re: [CMake] Cache loss on warning

2010-08-20 Thread Michael Wild
On 20. Aug, 2010, at 14:29 , Diablo 666 wrote: > >> This sounds like a pretty oldish version of CMake to me... What version are >> you using? > > "cmake version 2.6-patch 4", Compatibility mode is set to 2.6 via the > CMakeLists.txt Yeah, that was a problem of 2.6. 2.8 doesn't try to force t

Re: [CMake] BundleUtilities naming and easing packaging

2010-08-20 Thread Michael Wild
On 20. Aug, 2010, at 14:42 , Eric Noulard wrote: > 2010/8/20 David Cole : >> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Mike McQuaid wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> There's been some discussion on >>> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11126 and I raised the issue about >>> the BundleUtilities port to

Re: [CMake] BundleUtilities naming and easing packaging

2010-08-20 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/8/20 Mike McQuaid : > > On 20 Aug 2010, at 13:09, David Cole wrote: > >> Not a big fan of this one either. Personally, I think it's stupid even to >> have differences between the build tree and the install tree. Now, with >> this, you'd have differences between the "make install" tree and t

Re: [CMake] BundleUtilities naming and easing packaging

2010-08-20 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/8/20 David Cole : > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Mike McQuaid wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> There's been some discussion on >> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11126 and I raised the issue about >> the BundleUtilities port to Windows/Linux: the naming is so bad as to make >> this (prett

Re: [CMake] BundleUtilities naming and easing packaging

2010-08-20 Thread Mike McQuaid
On 20 Aug 2010, at 13:09, David Cole wrote: > Sorry about that. The name was chosen when the functionality was Mac-only, > then we extended it to cover Windows/Linux. What name would you suggest as > "more discoverable" or "better"? I'd go for "InstallPrerequisites" personally, it seems to fit

Re: [CMake] Cache loss on warning

2010-08-20 Thread Diablo 666
> This sounds like a pretty oldish version of CMake to me... What version are > you using? "cmake version 2.6-patch 4", Compatibility mode is set to 2.6 via the CMakeLists.txt ___ Powered by www.kitware.com V

Re: [CMake] BundleUtilities naming and easing packaging

2010-08-20 Thread David Cole
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Mike McQuaid wrote: > Hi, > > There's been some discussion on > http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11126 and I raised the issue > about the BundleUtilities port to Windows/Linux: the naming is so bad as to > make this (pretty cool) feature completely undisc

[CMake] BundleUtilities naming and easing packaging

2010-08-20 Thread Mike McQuaid
Hi, There's been some discussion on http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11126 and I raised the issue about the BundleUtilities port to Windows/Linux: the naming is so bad as to make this (pretty cool) feature completely undiscoverable. I assumed, as I'd think others would, that this woul

Re: [CMake] Cache loss on warning

2010-08-20 Thread Michael Wild
On 20. Aug, 2010, at 10:56 , Diablo 666 wrote: > > Hi, > > there seems to be a little bug in ccmake: > When I start cmake like follows: > > cmake . -DFOO_DIR=/path/to -DVTK_DIR=/other/path/to > > I get the following warning: > > Warning: CMake is forcing CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER to "/usr/bin/g++"

Re: [CMake] Creating custom file before building/compiling with cmake

2010-08-20 Thread Michael Wild
On 19. Aug, 2010, at 23:36 , Michael Hertling wrote: > On 08/19/2010 09:42 PM, Michael Wild wrote: >> >> In that case I recommend creating a CMake script (e.g. >> create_application_version.cmake) which creates the ApplicationVersion.xml >> file. It queries the current revision (have a look at

[CMake] Cache loss on warning

2010-08-20 Thread Diablo 666
Hi, there seems to be a little bug in ccmake: When I start cmake like follows: cmake . -DFOO_DIR=/path/to -DVTK_DIR=/other/path/to I get the following warning: Warning: CMake is forcing CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER to "/usr/bin/g++" to match that imported from VTK. This is required because C++ project

Re: [CMake] Setting CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS..., CMAKE_C_FLAGS... and CMAKE_C_STANDARD_LIBRARIES_INIT and friends on a per target basis

2010-08-20 Thread Verweij, Arjen
I can't say I share this experience. We use this mechanism to substitute "standard" flags with less or more optimization and/or other options. Usually -O3 instead of -O2, and I don't get them both on the commandline. Arjen From: Brian Davis [mailto:bitmi...@gmail.com] >>set_source_files_prope

Re: [CMake] Warnings and error

2010-08-20 Thread Johny
On 08/19/2010 09:20 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: On Thursday 19 August 2010, Johny wrote: Hey, Is there any way to increase the number of warnings and errors displayed on CDash ? Also can we somehow suppress certain warnings and errors ? Yes, you have to create a CTestCustom.cmake: