Re: [CMake] Has anybody tried to use CMake to build software on the MinGW/MSYS/Wine platform?

2010-04-01 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/4/2 Alan W. Irwin : [..] > > I feel this platform has revolutionary potential. [...lengthy interesting post ...] May be you two can Wiki-fied your experimental story such that it would be easier to reproduce [and sometimes update] the procedure? -- Erk Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et

Re: [CMake] Has anybody tried to use CMake to build software on the MinGW/MSYS/Wine platform?

2010-04-01 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2010-03-29 12:43-0600 Clinton Stimpson wrote: On Monday 29 March 2010 12:27:17 pm Alan W. Irwin wrote: Wine (winehq.com) is free (in both senses) software that provides a Windows work-alike that appears (from news stories, I have no personal experience yet) to be fairly mature. Thus, I was

Re: [CMake] Visual Studio 2010

2010-04-01 Thread J Decker
That reminds me, can ${PROJECT_NAME} contain slashes? and if so, could it just put the content in that folder path in the project? On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 3:07 AM, elizabeta petreska wrote: > Hello > > I am using cmake 2.8 to generate Visual Studio 2010 solution files. > > I have the following c

Re: [CMake] git too difficult CMake switching to sccs

2010-04-01 Thread J Decker
Uhmm may I humbly suggest Monotone? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_revision_control_software http://versioncontrolblog.com/comparison/ The only penalty (and it's ceratinly not small), is that all the community ran away, and noone made a Tortoise port for it (like git, mercurial, ...

Re: [CMake] git too difficult CMake switching to sccs

2010-04-01 Thread Bill Lorensen
How about 7 track tapes? On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Michael Wild wrote: > I vote for sending diffs on 8" floppies (3.5" are such fiddly things) and use > tar for archiving purposes. And all contributors are encouraged to use ed to > do the coding since it is much less distracting than any

Re: [CMake] 2.8.1 vs 2.8.0

2010-04-01 Thread David Cole
If you run cmake with "--debug-trycompile", it will leave the droppings you're looking for. >From cmake --help: --debug-trycompile = Do not delete the try compile directories. HTH, David On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Phil Smith wrote: > Those who have had my dumb questions inflict

[CMake] 2.8.1 vs 2.8.0

2010-04-01 Thread Phil Smith
Those who have had my dumb questions inflicted on them in the past will recall that I'm using CMake with a cross-compiler (Dignus) for IBM System z (mainframes). We recently added a new developer, and in setting her up, we had problems with: -- Check size of unsigned long long - failed (and all

[CMake] CTest : Submit tests on computing nodes and 'APPEND' command

2010-04-01 Thread olivier.pierard
Dear all, On one platform, I update, configure and build the software on a master node and then submit the testing part on computation nodes via a SGE script (builds impossible on computation nodes unfortunately). As command in the submission script, there are two possibilities: - Call 'ctest -S

Re: [CMake] target_link_libraries difficulties

2010-04-01 Thread Michael Jackson
Not sure if this is recommended or not with CMake 2.8 BUT: [mjack...@ferb]$ cmake --help-command link_directories cmake version 2.6-patch 4 -- SingleItem link_directories Specify directories in which the linker

[CMake] target_link_libraries difficulties

2010-04-01 Thread Benoit Thomas
Hello, I'm trying to find a work around since target_link_libraries cannot be used per-configuration. I know that out-of-build could solve my problem, but my team is currently migrating from Visual Studio to cmake, so I need something which "feel" more like Visual Studio. My current project

Re: [CMake] git too difficult CMake switching to sccs

2010-04-01 Thread Michael Wild
I vote for sending diffs on 8" floppies (3.5" are such fiddly things) and use tar for archiving purposes. And all contributors are encouraged to use ed to do the coding since it is much less distracting than any of the alternatives. On 1. Apr, 2010, at 14:54 , Daniel Blezek wrote: > Hmmm, SCCS

Re: [CMake] git too difficult CMake switching to sccs

2010-04-01 Thread Daniel Blezek
Hmmm, SCCS seems a bit unusable, especially for noobs. Based on this post http://www.newt.com/scm/rcs-sccs, I suggest we move to RCS. One question: what is this thing called a "3.5 inch floppy"? Happy 4/1/10 On 4/1/10 6:18 AM, "Bill Hoffman" wrote: > After trying git for a while, the CMake d

Re: [CMake] git too difficult CMake switching to sccs

2010-04-01 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/4/1 Bill Hoffman : > After trying git for a while, the CMake developers have decided that git  is > way too complicated, and allows too many edits to take place simultaneously. >   So, we have decided to use sccs instead.  With sccs, only one developer at > a time can change a file, this avoid

Re: [CMake] git too difficult CMake switching to sccs

2010-04-01 Thread Markus Duft
pfuahahaha rofl On 04/01/10 13:18, Bill Hoffman wrote: > After trying git for a while, the CMake developers have decided that git > is way too complicated, and allows too many edits to take place > simultaneously. So, we have decided to use sccs instead. With sccs, > only one develope

Re: [CMake] git too difficult CMake switching to sccs

2010-04-01 Thread Dave Partyka
LOL! On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Bill Hoffman wrote: > After trying git for a while, the CMake developers have decided that git > is way too complicated, and allows too many edits to take place > simultaneously. So, we have decided to use sccs instead. With sccs, only > one developer at a

[CMake] git too difficult CMake switching to sccs

2010-04-01 Thread Bill Hoffman
After trying git for a while, the CMake developers have decided that git is way too complicated, and allows too many edits to take place simultaneously. So, we have decided to use sccs instead. With sccs, only one developer at a time can change a file, this avoids conflicting edits to being

Re: [CMake] Batch Files in CTest (instead executables)

2010-04-01 Thread David Graf
Hello Michael I fixed it differently. I just two different scripts. One for ctest and one to execute executables from the command line directly. David On Mar 31, 2010, at 3:16 PM, Michael Wild wrote: > Why on earth is it so bad to have a trailing line with "--- YAY TEST PASSED > ---" (or som