On 2009-12-30 12:30-0800 Talin wrote:
That is more along the lines of what I was looking for. Thanks! :)
One further question: Using the technique you describe, the dependency file
will need to be regenerated each time a source file changes - i.e. if I add
a new "import" statement to a source fi
Hi
found the problem... Too much quoting, I'm sorry for that.
See below
Michael
On 30. Dec, 2009, at 21:41 , Bart wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I'm not quite sure if I'm getting the list building right, since if I add an
> extra source
> file to the project, it generates the int and long files, b
That is more along the lines of what I was looking for. Thanks! :)
One further question: Using the technique you describe, the dependency file
will need to be regenerated each time a source file changes - i.e. if I add
a new "import" statement to a source file, the list of dependencies will
change
I didn't quite understand.
Was there a workaround (besides setting the /openmp flag manually) ?
Rds,
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on
On 2009-12-30 10:42-0800 Talin wrote:
I guess what I am asking is - if I modified my build script to generate a
text file (Makefile, CMakeLists.txt or whatever) containing the
dependencies, would CMake be able to use it? I know that with GNU makefiles
there is a way to generate additional makefi
Hi,
Can the /VERSION:... flag in Linker/General only be added through
compiler-specific options for vs2008 in a cmake file?
Rds,
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.ht
I guess what I am asking is - if I modified my build script to generate a
text file (Makefile, CMakeLists.txt or whatever) containing the
dependencies, would CMake be able to use it? I know that with GNU makefiles
there is a way to generate additional makefiles as part of the build process
(althoug
On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Talin wrote:
> What's the recommended way in CMake to do automated dependency generation
> for languages that aren't directly supported by CMake? Suppose my compiler
> generates an output file which contains a list of all the source files that
> were used to make it,
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Jackson [mailto:mike.jack...@bluequartz.net]
> Sent: 30 December 2009 16:12
> To: Hicham Mouline
> Cc: cmake@cmake.org
> Subject: Re: [CMake] cmake file in build directory
>
>
> On Dec 30, 2009, at 10:48 AM, Hicham Mouline wrote:
>
> >> -Original
On 30. Dec, 2009, at 18:02 , Jed Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:51:29 +0100, Michael Wild wrote:
>>
>> On 30. Dec, 2009, at 17:32 , Jed Brown wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 12:29:05 +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles
>>> wrote:
I'm using CMake 2.8.0 on Linux. Yes, Michael is right: I
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:51:29 +0100, Michael Wild wrote:
>
> On 30. Dec, 2009, at 17:32 , Jed Brown wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 12:29:05 +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles
> > wrote:
> >> I'm using CMake 2.8.0 on Linux. Yes, Michael is right: I want it to
> >> happen automagically. That was the wh
On 30. Dec, 2009, at 17:32 , Jed Brown wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 12:29:05 +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles
> wrote:
>> I'm using CMake 2.8.0 on Linux. Yes, Michael is right: I want it to
>> happen automagically. That was the whole point of this thread :-)
>
> I would argue that FindXXX.cmake is t
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 12:29:05 +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles
wrote:
> I'm using CMake 2.8.0 on Linux. Yes, Michael is right: I want it to
> happen automagically. That was the whole point of this thread :-)
I would argue that FindXXX.cmake is the wrong place for the decision to
be made since I may wan
On Dec 30, 2009, at 10:48 AM, Hicham Mouline wrote:
-Original Message-
From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 December 2009 23:16
To: Hicham Mouline
Cc: cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] cmake file in build directory
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Hicham Moulin
> -Original Message-
> From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 29 December 2009 23:16
> To: Hicham Mouline
> Cc: cmake@cmake.org
> Subject: Re: [CMake] cmake file in build directory
>
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Hicham Mouline
wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am writin
2009/12/30 Talin :
> I've got a problem that has been vexing me for several months: It seems that
> when I create a custom rule using add_custom_command, the DEPENDS clause
> sometimes works and sometimes doesn't, and I can't figure out why.
> Here's what my custom rule looks like:
> # Link with
Hello,
On windows you need to add some #include to be able to link with some libs.
Example, if i want to check the existence of socket() function, i need
to link with ws2_32.lib, but i need to include winsock2.h too for some
defines purpose.
a small cmake example:
if(WIN32)
set(CMAKE_REQU
On Tuesday 29 December 2009, Guilherme Balena Versiani wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> FindRuby.cmake from CMake 2.8.0 does not support Ruby 1.9.1, and has some
> errors on variable RUBY_NODOT_VERSION (it wasn't created resulting in
> _nothing_ in expansions). It follows attached a patch to be applied to
>
2009/12/30 Winfried Dobbe :
>
> When I build a RPM with current CVS CMAKE/CPack for project
> the file name of the generated rpm is:
> --Linux.rpm
>
> The common filename for an rpm is
> ---.rpm
>
> Putting "Linux" in the file name doesn't provide much information because
> I don't know any other
When I build a RPM with current CVS CMAKE/CPack for project
the file name of the generated rpm is:
--Linux.rpm
The common filename for an rpm is
---.rpm
Putting "Linux" in the file name doesn't provide much information
because
I don't know any other OS that uses the RPM package system.
Hi
On 30. Dec, 2009, at 1:48 , Bart wrote:
> Thanks for those suggestions, I was on that path, but I can not get it to
> work properly:
>
> foo$ cmake .
> -- Configuring done
> -- Generating done
> -- Build files have been written to: /home/bart/foo
> foo$ make
> Scanning dependencies of target
21 matches
Mail list logo
