On 16. Dec, 2009, at 18:28 , Tyler Roscoe wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 05:55:54PM +0100, Olivier Pierard wrote:
>> In order to be able to use a macro/function from several sub-folders, I
>> would like to define it only once in the main CMakeLists.txt. However,
>> after some basic tests, It s
On Dec 16, 2009, at 5:36 PM, David Cole wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Clinton Stimpson
> wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 December 2009 04:05:22 pm Brad King wrote:
> > Clinton Stimpson wrote:
> > > It looks like a bug in the Xcode generator.
> > > Here's an even simpler example:
> > >
> >
They're device driver dlls for use system-wide.
-James
From: David Cole [mailto:david.c...@kitware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 4:34 PM
To: James Zipperer
Cc: CMake mailing list
Subject: Re: [CMake] using cmake to install dlls into windows/system32
What's the reason they need to be t
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Clinton Stimpson wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 December 2009 04:05:22 pm Brad King wrote:
> > Clinton Stimpson wrote:
> > > It looks like a bug in the Xcode generator.
> > > Here's an even simpler example:
> > >
> > > project(test_xcode)
> > >
> > > add_custom_command(O
What's the reason they need to be there?
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:18 PM, James Zipperer <
james.zippe...@modsystems.com> wrote:
> Yes, unfortunately they need to be there.
>
>
>
> -James
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* David Cole [mailto:david.c...@kitware.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 16, 2009 4:15
Yes, unfortunately they need to be there.
-James
From: David Cole [mailto:david.c...@kitware.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 4:15 PM
To: James Zipperer
Cc: CMake mailing list
Subject: Re: [CMake] using cmake to install dlls into windows/system32
You should avoid this if at all possible.
You should avoid this if at all possible.
Install dlls next to your program, not in the system32 directory.
Do you have a reason you need to install a dll there?
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 6:42 PM, James Zipperer <
james.zippe...@modsystems.com> wrote:
> Does anyone have an example of how to ins
Does anyone have an example of how to install dlls into %WINDIR%/system32 using
cmake/ cpack/nsis? Thanks!
-James
This message contains information which is confidential and privileged. Unless
you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee),
On Wednesday 16 December 2009 04:05:22 pm Brad King wrote:
> Clinton Stimpson wrote:
> > It looks like a bug in the Xcode generator.
> > Here's an even simpler example:
> >
> > project(test_xcode)
> >
> > add_custom_command(OUTPUT ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/test.h
> > COMMAND cp ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/te
Clinton Stimpson wrote:
> It looks like a bug in the Xcode generator.
> Here's an even simpler example:
>
> project(test_xcode)
>
> add_custom_command(OUTPUT ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/test.h
> COMMAND cp ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/test.h.in ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/test.h
> DEPENDS ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/test
On Wednesday 16 December 2009, Moreland, Kenneth wrote:
> I am setting up a ParaView dashboard for a cluster in which I have to
> compile on one computer and then submit a job to run parallel tests on
> another computer. This means I have to run one dashboard script to update
> and build the code.
On Wednesday 16 December 2009, Brian Davis wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply... it's finals week (school).
>
> See below
>
> 2009/12/9 Alexander Neundorf
>
> > On Saturday 05 December 2009, Brian Davis wrote:
> > > I have used boost jam before and there was a mechanism to build only
> > > what you
On Wednesday 16 December 2009, Phil Smith wrote:
> As Hawkeye said in the Second City version of Last of the Mohicans, "Me
> lie, big deal". Turns out I'd munged the path and have been using 2.6 all
> this time. Upgrading to 2.8 *did* make a *huge* difference, like 60% or so.
> Cow-orker had lied w
It looks like a bug in the Xcode generator.
Here's an even simpler example:
project(test_xcode)
add_custom_command(OUTPUT ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/test.h
COMMAND cp ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/test.h.in ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/test.h
DEPENDS ${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}/test.h.in
)
include_directories(${CMAK
On Wednesday 16 December 2009, Phil Smith wrote:
> These aren't all someone would need to use Dignus, as it's a two-step
> compiler: the C/C++ compilers generate assembler, and then there's an
> assemble step. But getting these files into CMake would be a step in the
> right direction.
Hmm, I thin
Here's a very short example that demonstrates the problem.
This is a CMake file for the "states" qt 4.6 example
(Developer/Examples/Qt/animation/states)
#---
PROJECT(states) # the name of your project
CMAKE_MINIMUM_REQUIRED(VERSION 2.4.0)
FIND_PACKAGE(Qt4 REQUIRED) # find and setup Qt4 for this
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Glenn Hughes wrote:
> Removed the globbing, same exact behavior.
> Any other ideas?
>
> Does this normally work for people? Any examples?
>
Works fine for me. Although I rarely update the .qrc files.
John
___
Powered by
Do you have a minimal example to demonstrate it?
I wonder if its related to how dependencies for qrc files are handled.
Clint
On Wednesday 16 December 2009 01:27:55 pm Glenn Hughes wrote:
> Removed the globbing, same exact behavior.
> Any other ideas?
>
> Does this normally work for people? Any
Removed the globbing, same exact behavior.
Any other ideas?
Does this normally work for people? Any examples?
G
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep m
These aren't all someone would need to use Dignus, as it's a two-step compiler:
the C/C++ compilers generate assembler, and then there's an assemble step. But
getting these files into CMake would be a step in the right direction.
The attached file is a ZIP file, renamed to (hopefully) avoid filt
I am intrigued by the "ExternalProject" feature of CMake 2.8. One
question that I have after reading through the Oct 09 "Kitware Source"
is this. If I do a "make clean" or "rebuild" are all the
"ExternalProjects" also cleaned/rebuilt? I could make an argument both
ways but I was curious wha
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 05:55:54PM +0100, Olivier Pierard wrote:
> In order to be able to use a macro/function from several sub-folders, I
> would like to define it only once in the main CMakeLists.txt. However,
> after some basic tests, It seems impossible to call this macro/function
> from subfo
Dear all,
What's up with the install procedure of a target included in a
subdirectory with the option 'ExcludeFromAll'. CMake says the behavior
is undefined. I would expect a command like 'make install
target_with_exclude_from_all'. How is it possible to manage that ?
I'm also wondering why cm
Hi John,
Thank you! This looks very nice, and uses a bit different approach than the one
used in PCHSupport.
Will use this!
Johan
--- Den tis 2009-12-15 skrev John Drescher :
Från: John Drescher
Ämne: Re: [CMake] (no subject)
Till: "Johan Knutzen"
Kopia: cmake@cmake.org
Datum: tisdag 15 de
Dear all,
In order to be able to use a macro/function from several sub-folders, I
would like to define it only once in the main CMakeLists.txt. However,
after some basic tests, It seems impossible to call this macro/function
from subfolders. Is is possible to do it ?
By the way, what's the basi
Clint,
Nice. This works perfectly (or at least as far as I can tell so far).
Thanks a lot
JB
> -Original Message-
> From: Clinton Stimpson [mailto:clin...@elemtech.com]
> Sent: 15 December 2009 15:51
> To: Biddiscombe, John A.
> Cc: paraview-develop...@paraview.org; cmake@cmake.org
> S
I am setting up a ParaView dashboard for a cluster in which I have to compile
on one computer and then submit a job to run parallel tests on another
computer. This means I have to run one dashboard script to update and build the
code. At the end of this script I submit a parallel job to run the
On Dec 15, 2009, at 7:24 PM, Glenn Hughes wrote:
Really? How could it? Suppose I only have 1 qrc file, named foo.qrc:
wouldn't these two lines be equivalent?
FILE (GLOB my_RESOURCES RELATIVE ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR} "res/
*.qrc" )
SET( my_RESOURCES "res/foo.qrc")
???
TIA
G
On Tue, Dec
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
>
> On 15. Dec, 2009, at 23:46 , Glenn Hughes wrote:
>
> >> I think the SDL developers are just being a bit "too" slick. They are
> setting up SDL for Xcode development where typically you would link to the
> SDL and then have a "Copy Files Pha
29 matches
Mail list logo
