On 2009-06-05 23:00:17 -0500, Bill Hoffman
said:
Works fine on osx+cmake version 2.6-patch 4 BUT fails on
ubuntu+hardy+cmake version 2.4-patch 7
No, should work for both. How does it fail on 2.4?
Just confirmed that "cmake version 2.6-patch 2" on jaunty/ubuntu works.
Evidence mounting t
On 2009-06-05 23:00:17 -0500, Bill Hoffman
said:
No, should work for both. How does it fail on 2.4?
Tried extensions .c .C .c++ .cc .cpp .cxx .m .M .mm .h .hh .h++ .hm
.hpp .hxx .in .txx
CMake Error: Cannot find source file
"/tmp/osx-branch/Vanilla/robots/commands_puck.c" for target "puc
Bob Tanner wrote:
On 2009-06-04 15:57:22 -0500, Bill Hoffman said:
set(COMMANDS_TYPE DOG)
configure_file(${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/commands.c.in
${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/commands_mars.c)
set(COMMANDS_TYPE PUCK)
configure_file(${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/commands.c.in
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:13 PM, David Cole wrote:
> You might want to open an issue that is a feature request that asks for
> exactly what you think you want
> There are several already open that talk about / have patches for adding
> support for WinCE and Symbian via adding CMake generators.
On 2009-06-04 15:57:22 -0500, Bill Hoffman
said:
set(COMMANDS_TYPE DOG)
configure_file(${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/commands.c.in
${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/commands_mars.c)
set(COMMANDS_TYPE PUCK)
configure_file(${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/commands.c.in
${CMAKE
I'm curious if someone has run into this before:
I'm using CMake to make some SWIG .i files. I then use SWIG on those
files, and it tells me that I have a syntax error. (I don't know SWIG
syntax that well, but I'm learning.) I thought I'd ask all of you if this
is something you were familia
On 2009-06-05 17:37:11 -0500, Bob Tanner
said:
First question, how to I add "-c" to ranlib evocation?
Sorry for the follow-up to my post, but here is the work-around I used.
IF (UNIX)
MESSAGE (STATUS "Unix")
IF (APPLE)
SET(CMAKE_C_CREATE_STATIC_LIBRARY
Ran into another issue with my netrek-server move to cmake.
Attempting to link with an internal library gives me a whole bunch of
"non_lazy_ptr" linking errors:
Linking C executable trimscores
Undefined symbols:
"_Cambot_out", referenced from:
_Cambot_out$non_lazy_ptr in libnetrek.a(getp
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 02:38:11PM -0600, James Bigler wrote:
> Is is possible to stop processing a FINDXYZ.cmake file with find_package
> without using a FATAL_ERROR? I want to stop processing the file once I hit
> a snag, but not stop all of CMake processing.
This feels like kind of a dumb answ
Is is possible to stop processing a FINDXYZ.cmake file with find_package
without using a FATAL_ERROR? I want to stop processing the file once I hit
a snag, but not stop all of CMake processing.
James
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware o
Consolidating all the things, the working CMakeLists.txt is as follows -
project(cmake_test)
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.6)
macro(m4tocxx outfilename)
add_custom_command(
OUTPUT ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/${outfilename}.cpp
COMMAND m4 -P
Tyler Roscoe [mailto:ty...@cryptio.net]:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 05:14:20PM -0400, david.k...@l-3com.com wrote:
> > I wonder if the concept of a PROJECT command in a subdirectory
> > of your top-level CMake directory is semantically sound. That is,
> > it might work sometimes but cause trouble
Hello fellow CMakers,
Is there any way to make the install step fail if the destination file
that is being overwritten is read-only?
I need to copy the built target from the off-source folder to a folder
under source control. And one of my options is to have the developer
build the INSTALL
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:43:44AM -0700, Kaveh Kohan wrote:
> question is too naive. I have a project created by Cmake. It produces
> an executable which is linked to many shared and static libraries. I
> am wondering what is the cmake option which brings all libraries
> including shared and stati
2009/6/5 Tyler Roscoe :
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 04:02:54PM -0400, Eric Jonas wrote:
>> I've written a server that serves up an interface using a cross-language
>> RPC mechanism (dbus) and currently build and unit test with cmake. But
>> testing cross-language (and more functional) aspects of the
Hi,
I am relatively newbie to CMake community. I have a question and I would be
thankful if anybody answers. I do apologize in advance if my question is too
naive. I have a project created by Cmake. It produces an executable which is
linked to many shared and static libraries. I am wondering wh
You might want to open an issue that is a feature request that asks for
exactly what you think you want
There are several already open that talk about / have patches for adding
support for WinCE and Symbian via adding CMake generators.
At least these 3 (and probably more) already touch on the
Can I define a new source type, like .m4 and add rules for it? That
would be ideal, I feel, for my case.
2009/6/5 Tyler Roscoe :
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:10:07PM +0530, Prasad H. L. wrote:
>> 2009/6/5 Denis Scherbakov :
>> >
>> >> Is it possible to set the preprocessing to all .m4 files
>> >>
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:10:07PM +0530, Prasad H. L. wrote:
> 2009/6/5 Denis Scherbakov :
> >
> >> Is it possible to set the preprocessing to all .m4 files
> >> avoiding a
> >> manual specification of list of files to processed?
> >
> > If your list of files changes all the time, you can use FILE
First, the thread I created about this question on Monday:
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2009-June/029805.html
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 08:57:34AM -0400, David Cole wrote:
> It is not possible with present CMake, although, in my mind it would be a
> reasonable feature request for CMake's Vis
2009/6/5 Denis Scherbakov :
>
>> Is it possible to set the preprocessing to all .m4 files
>> avoiding a
>> manual specification of list of files to processed?
>
> I don't know of such, but it does not mean that it does not exist.
>
> If your list of files changes all the time, you can use FILE(GLOB
I missed this reply since it wasn't threaded correctly (something wrong
with your mail reader David?). Luckily David said something slightly
different from what I said :).
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 05:14:20PM -0400, david.k...@l-3com.com wrote:
> I wonder if the concept of a PROJECT command in a sub
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 04:02:54PM -0400, Eric Jonas wrote:
> I've written a server that serves up an interface using a cross-language
> RPC mechanism (dbus) and currently build and unit test with cmake. But
> testing cross-language (and more functional) aspects of the server is
> easier to do from
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 12:47:48PM -0500, Randy Hancock wrote:
> external msproject to the parent. This is desirable, but lets say both
> the test/time project and the test/string project include the common
> lib. This makes common show up *twice* in the parent solution and
> causes a bunch of unwa
> Is it possible to set the preprocessing to all .m4 files
> avoiding a
> manual specification of list of files to processed?
I don't know of such, but it does not mean that it does not exist.
If your list of files changes all the time, you can use FILE(GLOB...)
to find all *.m4 files to automat
Thanks.
Is it possible to set the preprocessing to all .m4 files avoiding a
manual specification of list of files to processed?
2009/6/5 Denis Scherbakov :
>
>
>> 'm4' outputs only on stdout and does not have an option to
>> specify the
>> output file. Please
>> suggest me a solution for this...
Hi,
On 5 Jun 2009, at 15:52, Prasad H. L. wrote:
I tried as you have suggested. I have one more problem. I tried the
following CMakeLists.txt
project(cmake_test)
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.6)
add_executable(testcmake testcmake.m4.cpp)
add_custom_command(OUTPUT testcmake.m4.cpp
> 'm4' outputs only on stdout and does not have an option to
> specify the
> output file. Please
> suggest me a solution for this...
I had a similar problem and also with a preprocessor. I ended up writing
a CMake script like this:
EXECUTE_PROCESS(
COMMAND my-command "${VAR_IFILE}"
RESULT_V
I tried as you have suggested. I have one more problem. I tried the
following CMakeLists.txt
project(cmake_test)
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.6)
add_executable(testcmake testcmake.m4.cpp)
add_custom_command(OUTPUT testcmake.m4.cpp
m4 -P -s tes
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:37 AM, John Drescher wrote:
> The comment for CMAKE_RC_FLAGS is wrong:
>
> //RC compiler
> CMAKE_RC_COMPILER:FILEPATH=C:/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual
> Studio/COMMON/MSDev98/Bin/RC.EXE
>
> //Flags for Fortran compiler.
> CMAKE_RC_FLAGS:STRING=' '
>
BTW this is wi
The comment for CMAKE_RC_FLAGS is wrong:
//RC compiler
CMAKE_RC_COMPILER:FILEPATH=C:/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual
Studio/COMMON/MSDev98/Bin/RC.EXE
//Flags for Fortran compiler.
CMAKE_RC_FLAGS:STRING=' '
--
John M. Drescher
___
Powered by www.
> I wanted to do some looping in macros which are not
> possible in GNU
> CPP. So, I wrote
> macros in m4. I wish to pre-process all my C/C++ code with
> m4 before
> handing it over to
> gcc. I did not find any direct way out for doing this in
> cmake. Any
> ideas how to do it with
> cmake?
Use
Hi,
I wanted to do some looping in macros which are not possible in GNU
CPP. So, I wrote
macros in m4. I wish to pre-process all my C/C++ code with m4 before
handing it over to
gcc. I did not find any direct way out for doing this in cmake. Any
ideas how to do it with
cmake?
Regards,
Prasad
_
> > SET(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS
> > "${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -w -lX11 -Dcimg_use_xshm -lXext
> -Dcimg_use_xrandr -lXrandr
> > -O3 -fpermissive -march=nocona -m64 -ffast-math
> -funroll-loops
> -finline-functions")
> >
> > Any ideas on who I convert those to windows (Visual
> Studio 2008)
> flags?
I think
> I have these compiler flags in a CMakeList.txt file for some linux
code:
>
> SET(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS
> "${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -w -lX11 -Dcimg_use_xshm -lXext
-Dcimg_use_xrandr -lXrandr
> -O3 -fpermissive -march=nocona -m64 -ffast-math -funroll-loops
-finline-functions")
>
> Any ideas on who I convert
It is not possible with present CMake, although, in my mind it would be a
reasonable feature request for CMake's Visual Studio generator to support
multiple architecture solution/project files. If the native build tool
supports a given feature, then CMake might reasonably be expected to take
advant
> > ist it possible with cmake to generate one Visual
> Studio solution file for many different combinations
> > of configurations (Debug,Release) and platforms(win32,
> x64).
Not possible. This has been discussed recently.
The reason is that tests are being executed for a specific platform
and
On Jun 5, 2009, at 8:00 AM, Nils Busch wrote:
Hello,
ist it possible with cmake to generate one Visual Studio solution
file for many different combinations
of configurations (Debug,Release) and platforms(win32, x64).
In other words, instead of separate .sln files into separate
directories
Hello,
ist it possible with cmake to generate one Visual Studio solution file for many
different combinations
of configurations (Debug,Release) and platforms(win32, x64).
In other words, instead of separate .sln files into separate directories having
one
solution file in one directory allowing t
Zitat von bob :
Hello everyone, I first used cmake, build for VS2005 and found error:
" the c compiler cl is not able to complile a simple test program"
why?
Did you run the shell environment for VS2005? You find the link in the
start menu.
If you did: You have to also install the Platform S
Could you provide more info on the problem? cmake supports VS2005
2009/6/5 bob
> Hello everyone, I first used cmake, build for VS2005 and found error:
> " the c compiler cl is not able to complile a simple test program"
> why?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> best, bob
> bob...@163.com
> 2009-06-05
>
Hello everyone, I first used cmake, build for VS2005 and found error:
" the c compiler cl is not able to complile a simple test program"
why?
best, bob
bob...@163.com
2009-06-05
__
> I tried to
> add a target which do the cmake and define the variable like
> that :
>
> add_custom_target(MyInstall COMMAND "cmake -DLANG=%LANG%")
> add_dependencies(install MyInstall)
>
> but I can't add the dependency between the two targets.
I think currently it is not possible to force
Hi Denis and thank you for your answer
> either: cmake -DLANG=en_US /path/to/source
The problem with this solution is that I want the variable to be set when I
call make install and not cmake. I tried to add a target which do the cmake and
define the variable like that :
add_custom_target(MyIn
> “make install
> Lang=en_US” and
> in my CMakeLists.txt : install(FILES language/$ENV{Lang}
>
> My problem is that
> the variable is replaced
> when the cmake is called so when I call “make install
> Lang=xx”, the
You may try to do something of the following
either: cmake -DLANG=en_US /path/t
2009/6/5 James Bigler :
> if(NOT EXISTS ${dependency_file})
> #message("configuring dependency_file = ${dependency_file}")
> configure_file(
> ${empty_file}
> ${dependency_file} IMMEDIATE)
> endif()
The "IMMEDIATE" thing doesn't seem to be document, is it obsolete
or undocu
Hi everyone,
I'd like to do the following for my install target :
"make install Lang=en_US" and in my CMakeLists.txt : install(FILES
language/$ENV{Lang} ...) so that at each call of make install with a defined
variable, it calls the install target with the good path and when I call just
"make
47 matches
Mail list logo
