On 2008-07-04 12:08+0200 William Candillon wrote:
Hi,
I'm using the ADD_TEST command to test the output of my executable like this:
ADD_TEST(test mycommand)
SET_TEST_PROPERTIES(test PROPERTIES PASS_REGULAR_EXPRESSION "foo")
However, I would like to compare the output with the content of a
file
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Alexander Bubnov wrote:
> Hello!
> I am exploring cmake features. Now I have stopped at find_package,
> REQUIRED parameter. As I can see from manual:
>
> "The REQUIRED option stops processing with an
> error message if the package cannot be found."
> (cmake 2.6
O/H Georgios Petasis έγραψε:
O/H Georgios Petasis έγραψε:
Hi all,
I have some C code that embeds perl into a C application.
If I compile my code with:
cl.exe
and then:
link
the resulting dll works. But if I compile it with cmake, my code
always crashes, because a perl structure (a globa
O/H Georgios Petasis έγραψε:
Hi all,
I have some C code that embeds perl into a C application.
If I compile my code with:
cl.exe
and then:
link
the resulting dll works. But if I compile it with cmake, my code
always crashes, because a perl structure (a global pointer) is left
uninitiali
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently the CPack component features depend on some variables such as:
>
> CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL
> CPACK_COMPONENT_${CNAME}_GROUP
> ...
>
> These variables are typically easier to set at the point where you
Hello!
I am exploring cmake features. Now I have stopped at find_package,
REQUIRED parameter. As I can see from manual:
"The REQUIRED option stops processing with an
error message if the package cannot be found."
(cmake 2.6-patch 0)
My CMakeLists.txt looks like:
cmake_minimum_required(VERSI
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Philip Lowman wrote:
>
> Wow this is an old thread. Sorry for the late response.
>>
>> I think what's needed here is a way to detect the platform and allow
>> people to modify CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS and friends before they get ce
William Candillon wrote:
Hi,
I'm using the ADD_TEST command to test the output of my executable like this:
ADD_TEST(test mycommand)
SET_TEST_PROPERTIES(test PROPERTIES PASS_REGULAR_EXPRESSION "foo")
However, I would like to compare the output with the content of a
file. Is there a platform inde
Doug Gregor wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Fernando Cacciola
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, I found the problem today.
The version is parsed (from version.hpp) into a variable named
Booist_MAJOR_VERSION (et al)
But the comparison code incorrectly uses Boost_VERSION_MAJOR.
(Haven't tryed
Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 03.07.08 19:40:29, Fernando Cacciola wrote:
On 03.07.08 12:23:11, Doug Gregor wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Fernando Cacciola
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(7)
I couldn't understand the dicotomy between the cached and non-cached
versions of the include dirs:
B
Hi,
I'm using the ADD_TEST command to test the output of my executable like this:
ADD_TEST(test mycommand)
SET_TEST_PROPERTIES(test PROPERTIES PASS_REGULAR_EXPRESSION "foo")
However, I would like to compare the output with the content of a
file. Is there a platform independent way to do that with
Hey guyz,
in my project i have some directories switched to other SVN repository.
CTEST_UPDATE marked them as updated, this makes continuous test useless
- it just runs every 10 minutes. Any suggestions ?
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 09:31:13 +0200
> Von: "Andreas Pokorny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: "Clemens Arth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: cmake@cmake.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: Re: [CMake] Visual Studio and Windows Mobile SDKs
On 03.07.08 19:40:29, Fernando Cacciola wrote:
>> On 03.07.08 12:23:11, Doug Gregor wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Fernando Cacciola
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(7)
I couldn't understand the dicotomy between the cached and non-cached
versions of the include dirs:
Hi there,
2008/7/4 Clemens Arth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> here's a short progress report. I've now managed to get my project compiled
> with
> Visual Studio 2008 with and without support for Windows Mobile 5 SDK; I
> basically
> managed that by compiling cmake from scratch, introducing a ne
Hi,
here's a short progress report. I've now managed to get my project compiled
with Visual Studio 2008 with and without support for Windows Mobile 5 SDK; I
basically managed that by compiling cmake from scratch, introducing a new
proprietary generator into the sources
(cmGlobalVisualStudio9_W
16 matches
Mail list logo