[CMake] TRY_RUN wrong program return value with --debug-compile

Hi list, I'm having a new problem with CMake; if anyone cares/remembers the past one, it was just a stupid typo in the filename. I have the file check_openal_spec_version_1_1.cpp which contains: #define AL_VERSION_1_1 #define AL_VERSION_1_0 int main() { #ifdef AL_VERSION_1_1

Re: [CMake] multiple executables

Thanks. VERBATIM was the problem. After, removing it, the code works perfectly. Thanks! Anyway, I am a little bit puzzled with documentation, as it states: > In the future VERBATIM may be enabled by default. The only reason > it is an option is to preserve compatibility with older CMake code.

Re: [CMake] add_custom_command: regenerate all on modifcation?

Bill Hoffman wrote: > Dave Milter wrote: >> cmake version 2.4-patch 8 >> >> and it not regenerates ui_foo.hpp after uncomment foo2.cpp, >> so it is regression, or previous (good for me behaviour) cause many bugs? >> > It is not a bug. It was a bug fix. If you changed a custom command in > 2.4 the

Re: [CMake] FindLua51.cmake

> Why not LUA51_FOUND? > Is this valid? > I think not. > Attached patch changes variable name LUA50_FOUND to LUA51_FOUND. Yes, that looks like a bug. That FIND_PACKAGE_HANDLE_STANDARD_ARGS stuff is new to me. Somebody else added it and must have done the normal copy/paste thing/bug. I checked in t

Re: [CMake] CPack NSIS no branding image

Try: SET(CPACK_PACKAGE_ICON "${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}test.bmp") There is a "bug" in the NSIS installer that refuses to extract the file name properly when there are only "/" forward slashes in the file name... HTH, David On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Torsten Grote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [CMake] multiple executables

Your initial attempt looks reasonable... Did you try it without the "VERBATIM" argument to the ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND? This sort of copy command should work if invoked from Visual Studio, even with the $(OutDir) reference... HTH, David On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Pečiva Jan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [CMake] [PATCH] FindQt4.cmake qt4_automoc improvements

On Sunday 01 June 2008 3:02:11 pm Christian Ehrlicher wrote: > Alexander Neundorf schrieb: > > On Thursday 29 May 2008, Christian Ehrlicher wrote: > >> Tanguy Krotoff schrieb: > >>> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:48 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> The bug that I got with QT_DEBUG/QT_NO_DEBUG not b

Re: [CMake] Testing endianess

Ahhh nevermind, the implementation changed in cmake 2.6 but interface remains the same. this is working out of the box, nice ! Sorry for the noise, -Mathieu On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > > I believe there is a new way to test endianne

[CMake] Testing endianess

Hi there, I believe there is a new way to test endianness with cmake. I was using: INCLUDE (${CMAKE_ROOT}/Modules/TestBigEndian.cmake) TEST_BIG_ENDIAN(GDCM_WORDS_BIGENDIAN) But this does not work when using mingw32 compiler on a linux box. Thanks ! -- Mathieu __

[CMake] FindLua51.cmake

Hi, cmakers! I've tried to find lua through FindLua51 module, but this module seems to be buggy. I have lua-5.1 but after include(FindLua51) I have LUA50_FOUND "true". Why not LUA51_FOUND? Is this valid? I think not. Attached patch changes variable name LUA50_FOUND to LUA51_FOUND. PS: Even bette

Re: [CMake] add_custom_command: regenerate all on modifcation?

Dave Milter wrote: Recently I try not cvs version with examples that I sent with previous email: $ cmake --version cmake version 2.4-patch 8 and it not regenerates ui_foo.hpp after uncomment foo2.cpp, so it is regression, or previous (good for me behaviour) cause many bugs? It is not a bug. It

[CMake] ACE_TAO

Hi, did anybody integrate the ACE_TAO corba library in a CMake project? Within the the shipped version of cmake I didn't find a file like "FindAceTao.cmake" but maybe someone assembled one before? Matthias -- Dipl.-Inform. Matthias Riechmann Institut für Prozessrechentechnik, Automation