Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake updated on the bugtracker

On 05.04.08 21:37:43, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > On 05.04.08 14:13:14, Bill Hoffman wrote: > > Andreas Pakulat wrote: > >> On 28.03.08 10:58:39, Bill Hoffman wrote: > >>> David Thulson wrote: > It would be nice if this could get into 2.6.0. Boost 1.35 is about to > be released: > > >>

Re: [CMake] Avoid cmake forcing CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER

Arunachalam Narayanaswamy wrote: > Hi, >Is there a way to avoid cmake forcing CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER? Here is my > problem. set the CXX environment variable to your compiler $ CXX=cpp_compiler cmake path_to_sources > I have a compiler and I have an MPI Wrapper written around this > compiler. I w

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake updated on the bugtracker

On 05.04.08 14:13:14, Bill Hoffman wrote: > Andreas Pakulat wrote: >> On 28.03.08 10:58:39, Bill Hoffman wrote: >>> David Thulson wrote: It would be nice if this could get into 2.6.0. Boost 1.35 is about to be released: http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2008/03/34896.php

[CMake] Avoid cmake forcing CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER

Hi, Is there a way to avoid cmake forcing CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER? Here is my problem. I have a compiler and I have an MPI Wrapper written around this compiler. I would want to compile ITK with the naked compiler because the wrapper has too many optimization flags which would be inappropriate

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake updated on the bugtracker

Andreas Pakulat wrote: On 28.03.08 10:58:39, Bill Hoffman wrote: David Thulson wrote: It would be nice if this could get into 2.6.0. Boost 1.35 is about to be released: http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2008/03/34896.php And it at least appears that the latest version in the bug tracker wil

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake updated on the bugtracker

On 28.03.08 10:58:39, Bill Hoffman wrote: > David Thulson wrote: >> It would be nice if this could get into 2.6.0. Boost 1.35 is about to >> be released: >> >> http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2008/03/34896.php >> >> And it at least appears that the latest version in the bug tracker >> will look

Re: [CMake] FindBoost.cmake updated on the bugtracker

On 02.04.08 19:30:21, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > Andreas Pakulat wrote: >> Ok, I give in. Do you mind separating the loop into two so its easier to >> see whats going on and we don't have two use-less cache variables? Then >> I'll apply what you send to kdevplatform and add a new version to the >> c

Re: [CMake] Cpack from CMake and NSIS

That NSIS file is configure from Modules/NSIS.template.in -- in the input file the line giving you an error is: InstallDir "[EMAIL PROTECTED]@" So there must be a carriage return in your definition of CPACK_PACKAGE_INSTALL_DIRECTORY somehow. Perhaps this: SET(CPACK_PACKAGE_INSTALL_DIRECT

[CMake] Cpack from CMake and NSIS

Hi, I try to create a package for windows using NSIS (2.36) generator and cmake2.6 RC6 This is the error that I get Run CPack packaging tool... CPack: Create package using NSIS CPack: Install projects CPack: - Run preinstall target for: aten CPack: - Install project: aten Don't forget

Re: [CMake] (no subject)

Hi, >I've spent the last few days trying to convince CMake to configure a >toy FORTRAN project without success. I'm hoping that someone on this >list can point me in the right direction. Here are the details: Last time when I checked the VS2005 generator was not working for Fortran. The thing i

Re: [CMake] Testing for time.h on various platforms

Am Freitag 04 April 2008 schrieb Mike Jackson: > I am looking for a game plan (or code..) to test for a header file and > where the "correct" location of that header might be. Seems on some > systems, time.h should be were on others it is just > . Should I create some cmake code to test each one