Hi,
I would like to add coverage on my project with a valgrind pass i saw
that there is something with dashboard. But when i run ctest it says
CTestConfiguration.ini
I dont need to submit result or anything like that i would like to
dispay the coverage and the result of valgrind, like i did wit
On 2008-04-03 23:13+0200 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Thursday 03 April 2008, you wrote:
On 2008-04-03 21:06+0200 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
If you run pkg-config of the build host it will find the pkg-config files
of the libs for the build host.
For the record, you have complete control of w
Also, I posted this to the Xcode list. Follow the threads for the responses.
http://lists.apple.com/archives/xcode-users/2007/May/msg00417.html
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
I think I recall reading Brad's notes on the bug report, and I think
they look good. I'm still trying to find time to dig through all my
correspondences on this issue. Below is something I posted to the
OpenSceneGraph mailing list. It talks about versioning at the dylib
level, but also talks about
I used cmake 2.4.8
Egon Kocjan wrote:
Hello again,
I am slowly porting a complicated project to cmake. I have an acyclic
graph of dependencies and "shared" build directories and I have trouble
generating VS slns. A simple example (the real build is way more
complicated):
liba/include.cmake
Hello again,
I am slowly porting a complicated project to cmake. I have an acyclic
graph of dependencies and "shared" build directories and I have trouble
generating VS slns. A simple example (the real build is way more
complicated):
liba/include.cmake:
get_filename_component(liba_dir ${CMAK
On 2008-04-03 21:11+0200 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Here's a feature request for the versioning stuff on OSX:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=4383
Hi Alex:
Thanks very much for that important reference on this issue.
The rest of my comments are directed to Brad who has made a consi
On Thursday 03 April 2008, you wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Alexander Neundorf
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 April 2008, Mehdi Rabah wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > > ok then I re-explain : I have a custom rule "sync" that send binaries
> > > to
> >
> > a
> >
> > > embedde
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Alexander Neundorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thursday 03 April 2008, Mehdi Rabah wrote:
> ...
> > ok then I re-explain : I have a custom rule "sync" that send binaries to
> a
> > embedded computer. To make sure that the binaries that I send are the
> > lastes
On Thursday 03 April 2008, you wrote:
> On 2008-04-03 21:06+0200 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > If you run pkg-config of the build host it will find the pkg-config files
> > of the libs for the build host.
>
> For the record, you have complete control of what set of *.pc files
> the build-host pkg-c
On 2008-04-03 21:06+0200 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
If you run pkg-config of the build host it will find the pkg-config files of
the libs for the build host.
For the record, you have complete control of what set of *.pc files
the build-host pkg-config executable finds using the PKG_CONFIG_PATH
On Thursday 03 April 2008, Mehdi Rabah wrote:
...
> ok then I re-explain : I have a custom rule "sync" that send binaries to a
> embedded computer. To make sure that the binaries that I send are the
> lastest version (ie the source have recompiled since my last modification)
> I wanted to make my "
Gerhard den Hollander wrote:
Im trying to setup a Cdash dashoard, most of it seems to go fine,
but the submissions do not show up on the dashboard
One thing that struck me as odd is the Trigger Site: line
http://172.17.0.112/cgi-bin/Submit-Random-TestingResults.cgi
there is no such cgi file, an
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Thursday 03 April 2008, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
One prinicipal problem I see with pkg-config is that it is intended to be used
in such a way that the stdout is directly used as command line arguments for
the compiler.
E.g. instead of a list of include directories it
Gerhard den Hollander wrote:
Im trying to setup a Cdash dashoard, most of it seems to go fine,
but the submissions do not show up on the dashboard
One thing that struck me as odd is the Trigger Site: line
http://172.17.0.112/cgi-bin/Submit-Random-TestingResults.cgi
You have to modify the CTes
On Thursday 03 April 2008, Mike Arthur wrote:
> Hey guys,
> First of all, nice work on CMake/CPack, great tools.
>
> I'm having some problems attempting to get CPack to build multiple packages
> and I'm wondering what I'm trying to do is possible.
>
> The folder layout (for this example) is the fol
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Thursday 03 April 2008, Mike Arthur wrote:
Hey guys,
First of all, nice work on CMake/CPack, great tools.
I'm having some problems attempting to get CPack to build multiple packages
and I'm wondering what I'm trying to do is possible.
The folder layout (for this ex
Im trying to setup a Cdash dashoard, most of it seems to go fine,
but the submissions do not show up on the dashboard
One thing that struck me as odd is the Trigger Site: line
http://172.17.0.112/cgi-bin/Submit-Random-TestingResults.cgi
there is no such cgi file, and there is nothing in the CDash
On Thursday 03 April 2008, Vitor Vasconcelos Araujo Silva wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I'm trying to use the TRY_COMPILE command and I guess I'm probaly
> making some mistake or I misunderstood the command.
>
> My command is this one:
>
> TRY_COMPILE(RESULT ${PROJECT_BINARY_DIR}
>
> ${PR
On Thursday 03 April 2008, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> Quoting "Alan W. Irwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 2008-04-02 20:08-0700 E. Wing wrote:
> >> This seems familiar. I remember a long discussion on this somewhere.
> >> It must have been offlist. I forgot the outcome. Were we going to
> >> intr
On Thursday 03 April 2008, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2008-04-02 18:19-0700 E. Wing wrote:
> >>> [Alan said]
> >>> In sum, pkg-config is already widely used on the Linux/Mac OS X side of
> >>> things and there doesn't seem to be any fundamental reason to
> >>> discourage the
> >>> use of pkg-config
Vitor Vasconcelos Araujo Silva wrote:
Hello guys,
I'm trying to use the TRY_COMPILE command and I guess I'm probaly
making some mistake or I misunderstood the command.
My command is this one:
TRY_COMPILE(RESULT ${PROJECT_BINARY_DIR}
${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}/teste.cpp
CMAKE_FLAGS
CO
Hello guys,
I'm trying to use the TRY_COMPILE command and I guess I'm probaly
making some mistake or I misunderstood the command.
My command is this one:
TRY_COMPILE(RESULT ${PROJECT_BINARY_DIR}
${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}/teste.cpp
CMAKE_FLAGS
COMPILE_DEFINITIONS -I${QT_INCLUDE_DIR}
Hey guys,
First of all, nice work on CMake/CPack, great tools.
I'm having some problems attempting to get CPack to build multiple packages
and I'm wondering what I'm trying to do is possible.
The folder layout (for this example) is the following:
src/
src/host/
src/client/
There are CMakeLists
David Cole wrote:
I think it should be a new CPack generator that expects a single bundle
in its make install tree and that makes a simple .dmg wrapper around
that bundle. Instead of "PackageMaker" generator, maybe a new
"BundleDMG" generator?
That sounds good to me.
-Bill
I think it should be a new CPack generator that expects a single bundle in
its make install tree and that makes a simple .dmg wrapper around that
bundle. Instead of "PackageMaker" generator, maybe a new "BundleDMG"
generator?
Thx,
David
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Mike Jackson <[EMAIL PROTE
On Apr 2, 2008, at 4:50 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:
Nicolas Desprès wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Bill Hoffman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
I suppose we could. I like the installer as it prompts the user
for the
license, and setting up the command line stuff. Also, I have
som
Hello,
how can I make an INSTALL( DIRECTORY ) target depend on another
target FOO created with ADD_CUSTOM_TARGET to ensure the target gets
build before installation.
I tried something like:
install( CODE "execute_process ( COMMAND make doc )" )
but oviously this is not independent of p
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:01 PM, Alexander Neundorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 April 2008, you wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Alexander Neundorf
> ...
> > ok but there must be some way to say that I want to rebuild my project
> when
> > I call this specific "sync" tar
}/CMake/CTestCustom.ctest @ONLY)
> > FILE(WRITE ${GDCM_BINARY_DIR}/CTestCustom.cmake
> >"INCLUDE(\"${GDCM_BINARY_DIR}/CMake/CTestCustom.ctest\")\n")
> > ENABLE_TESTING()
> > INCLUDE(CTest)
> > SUBDIRS(Testing)
> > ENDIF(BUILD_TESTING)
IR}/CMake/CTestCustom.ctest @ONLY)
> FILE(WRITE ${GDCM_BINARY_DIR}/CTestCustom.cmake
>"INCLUDE(\"${GDCM_BINARY_DIR}/CMake/CTestCustom.ctest\")\n")
> ENABLE_TESTING()
> INCLUDE(CTest)
> SUBDIRS(Testing)
> ENDIF(BUILD_TESTING)
>
>
> But still I am getti
;INCLUDE(\"${GDCM_BINARY_DIR}/CMake/CTestCustom.ctest\")\n")
ENABLE_TESTING()
INCLUDE(CTest)
SUBDIRS(Testing)
ENDIF(BUILD_TESTING)
But still I am getting warnings related to building expat:
http://public.kitware.com/GDCM/Testing/Sites/zorglub/GDCM2-trunk-Linux-gcc42-SVN/20
> Von: "Mathieu Malaterre"
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 8:13 PM, Bill Hoffman
> wrote:
> > I am happy to announce that CMake 2.6.0 RC6 is ready for testing.
> > You can find the source and binaries here:
> > http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.6/.
> >
> > Here is the list of changes for the 2.6.0 branch so
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 8:13 PM, Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am happy to announce that CMake 2.6.0 RC6 is ready for testing.
> You can find the source and binaries here:
> http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.6/.
>
> Here is the list of changes for the 2.6.0 branch so far:
>
> Changes in
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
(2) The cpack section needs expansion (especially since cpack is so poorly
documented elsewhere).
Are you sure that the PDF is the right place to expand the CPack documentation
and not the wiki?
-- andreas
--
http://www.cynapses.org/ - cybernetic synapses
Quoting "Alan W. Irwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 2008-04-02 20:08-0700 E. Wing wrote:
This seems familiar. I remember a long discussion on this somewhere.
It must have been offlist. I forgot the outcome. Were we going to
introduce a different versioning variable separate from SOVERSION?
You m
36 matches
Mail list logo
