Re: [CMake] Qt version of Cmake

Funny, for a lng time nothing happens, and now three people are working on one :-) I'm, too, mainly to learn how to TDD a GUI, so I have a different goal, perhaps I'll just go on to see how a TDD program differs from a "traditionally" coded one, see http://sourceforge.net/projects/qcmake if you

[CMake] can't pipe cl.exe in a custom command

I'm trying to grab the cl.exe banner so I can determine the MSVC version number. If cl.exe is in the path, then the following works at a Windows Command Prompt. This gives a short banner with the VC version number and copyright. cl /? 2> banner.txt But when I try to do it in a custom command,

Re: [CMake] Qt version of Cmake

Mike Jackson wrote: I am moving along on my Qt Implementation of CMakeSetup. I have project loading, parsing of the Cache file, toggling of Advanced Values, real time filtering of the cache table all generally working. I started this evening on actually invoking the "configure" button. Looks li

Re: [CMake] Qt version of Cmake

I am moving along on my Qt Implementation of CMakeSetup. I have project loading, parsing of the Cache file, toggling of Advanced Values, real time filtering of the cache table all generally working. I started this evening on actually invoking the "configure" button. Looks like I am not pick

[CMake] CMAKE_C_COMPILER for MSVC doesn't have a path

When I examine CMAKE_C_COMPILER for other compilers, such as MinGW, I get a full path. So I can execute it with EXECUTE_PROCESS and extract the compiler version number fairly readily. For MSVC though, all I get is "cl". CMake knows where that cl actually is, but it's not telling me. There's no

[CMake] Eager to see CMake 2.6

Hello list. I checked the archives: http://marc.info/?l=cmake&w=2&r=1&s=2.6+release+schedule&q=b but I got no hits so I am asking here out of eagerness. When is 2.6 coming out? Shriramana Sharma. ___ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake

Re: [CMake] improve the CMake language?

On Nov 5, 2007 5:30 PM, Gonzalo Garramuño <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brandon Van Every wrote: > > > > I didn't realize that Ruby is GPLed. > > http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/LICENSE.txt > > Oh well, so much for embedding Ruby! > > It isn't. Where did you get that idea from !? Brandon, you have a

RE: [CMake] improve the CMake language?

It is my understanding that a lot of the cmake modules are implemented in the cmake language? It would be a big task to maintain multiple languages for the cmake modules. While speed of a scripting language is interesting, I would expect 90% of the work would be done in the C++ part of cmake.

RE: [CMake] improve the CMake language?

This part of the license would concern me. Are all files of interest, by other authors, guaranteed to be BSD friendly? 4. You may modify and include the part of the software into any other software (possibly commercial). But some files in the distribution are not written by the auth

Re: [CMake] improve the CMake language?

Ken Martin wrote: I have looked at incorporating Lua into CMake as an alternate language. Interesting. You didn't by any chance used swig to wrap it? I admit I would be curious to see that fork of cmake to study the changes. Using swig right now would be the best approach, as with just a few

Re: [CMake] improve the CMake language?

Brandon Van Every wrote: I didn't realize that Ruby is GPLed. http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/LICENSE.txt Oh well, so much for embedding Ruby! It isn't. Where did you get that idea from !? Brandon, you have a tendency to email FUD that is amazing... even when you provide links to text that cl

Re: [CMake] Single line crashes cmake

On Nov 5, 2007 4:36 PM, Joseph Garvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to find all folders matching the pattern "blitz-[0-9].[0-9]" so > it would match blitz-0.3, blitz-2.4, etc. within the folders C:\ and > C:\Program Files. Starting to code this I put this in an otherwise empty > .cmake fi

[CMake] Single line crashes cmake

I'm trying to find all folders matching the pattern "blitz-[0-9].[0-9]" so it would match blitz-0.3, blitz-2.4, etc. within the folders C:\ and C:\Program Files. Starting to code this I put this in an otherwise empty .cmake file: FILE(GLOB BLITZ_TMP "C:/" "blitz-[0-9].[0-9]") MESSAGE(${BLITZ_TMP})

Re: [CMake] Problem using ccache & cmake

[Steven sorry for multiple copies I slipped on keyboard once then forget the list :=(( ] 2007/11/5, Steven Van Ingelgem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Eric, > > > I am using CMake CVS, and there it doesn't work with. I just retried: > > "CC="ccache gcc" CXX="ccache g++" cmake ." Ok this seems to be

Re: [CMake] Problem using ccache & cmake

2007/11/5, Steven Van Ingelgem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > What I saw today in the sources is that cmake uses /usr/bin/ccache as > it's compiler, and gcc/cc/g++ as it's first argument... So it should > work, but I have no idea why it returns it cannot find the file cc. > > That is imho somewhere an erro

Re: [CMake] compiler major, minor version

Please see: http://predef.sourceforge.net/precomp.html for an interesting compiler version reference page. Juan Brandon Van Every wrote: > Is there any canonical way to extract the compiler's major and minor > version numbers? I can do this with regexes, but as CMake moves into > cross-compil

Re: [CMake] Problem using ccache & cmake

What I saw today in the sources is that cmake uses /usr/bin/ccache as it's compiler, and gcc/cc/g++ as it's first argument... So it should work, but I have no idea why it returns it cannot find the file cc. That is imho somewhere an error in the execute process (or a misinterpretion of the macro f

[CMake] compiler major, minor version

Is there any canonical way to extract the compiler's major and minor version numbers? I can do this with regexes, but as CMake moves into cross-compilation territory, it seems like it would be a typical operation and possibly canonized already. If not then perhaps it should be, i.e. a feature req

[CMake] Problem using ccache & cmake

Hi, I had a problem trying to use ccache with cmake the following way: $ export GCC="ccache gcc" $ export CC="ccache cc" $ export CXX="ccache g++" $ cmake . (in the root of the -clean- CMake CVS directory) This resulted in the following output: $ rm CMakeCache.txt CMakeFiles/ -Rf && cmake . CM

[CMake] RE: ADD_TEST for debug/release configurations?

Dear list, > -Original Message- > From: Jan Wurster > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 10:29 AM > > Is there any way at all for the vs8 generator to > enable/disable test cases in RUN_TESTS on the basis of the > selected configuration (debug/release)? Kind of like in > TARGET_LINK_LI

Re: [CMake] Symbian support

On 11/3/07, Alexander Neundorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the development platform ? Platforms for S60 3rd edition: winscw (emulator), gcce (phone) > Which compiler do you use ? mwccsym2.exe (Nokia codewarrior C/C++ compiler for winscw platform) and gcce (for GCCE platform) > What are

[CMake] Signup for a new bug-tracker account broken? (was: Re: INSTALL DIRECTORY broken)

I want to report this as a bug, but signing up for a bug-tracker account doesn't work for me. I go through the registration and get to the point where it states that it has sent me an email with login details, but it hasn't. I've checked my spam filters and can't find the message there either.