Hi folks, I'm having a problem that seems to be very simple...
I'm trying to compile a program which INCLUDES the following headers
//--
#include "vtkGenericEnsightReader.h"
#include "vtkXMLDataSetWriter.h"
#include "vtkDataArrayCollection.h"
#incl
On Saturday 22 Sep 2007 1:45:26 am Juan Sanchez wrote:
> How do you add an externally library for linking into a target? I am
> getting something like this from TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES?
>
> CMake Error: Attempt to add link library "/bar/linux-x86/opt/foo.a" to
> target "waterlooApps" which is not bu
On 2007-09-21 14:42-0600 James Bigler wrote:
James Bigler wrote:
Is there an example I could look at to parse out the individual version
numbers, once I get this string?
STRING(REGEX MATCH "[0-9]+\\.[0-9]+\\.[0-9]+" version-string ${output})
I want to be able to get the three integers out of
On 09/21/2007 10:15 PM, Juan Sanchez wrote:
Hello,
How do you add an externally library for linking into a target? I am
getting something like this from TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES?
CMake Error: Attempt to add link library "/bar/linux-x86/opt/foo.a" to
target "waterlooApps" which is not built by th
James Bigler wrote:
Is there an example I could look at to parse out the individual version
numbers, once I get this string?
STRING(REGEX MATCH "[0-9]+\\.[0-9]+\\.[0-9]+" version-string ${output})
I want to be able to get the three integers out of version-string.
I found some code in FindQt4
Hello,
How do you add an externally library for linking into a target? I am
getting something like this from TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES?
CMake Error: Attempt to add link library "/bar/linux-x86/opt/foo.a" to
target "waterlooApps" which is not built by this project.
Thanks,
Juan
_
Is there an example I could look at to parse out the individual version numbers,
once I get this string?
STRING(REGEX MATCH "[0-9]+\\.[0-9]+\\.[0-9]+" version-string ${output})
I want to be able to get the three integers out of version-string.
Thanks,
James
Juan Sanchez wrote:
Ok,
But cpp doesn't discriminate between ${BAR} and BAR.
#include
using namespace std;
#define foo(x) x = 3; cout << x << "\n";
int main()
{
int y = 1;
foo(y);
cout << y << endl;
}
I said like cpp, not exactly cpp. The difference is you have to use ${} to
expand
Ok,
But cpp doesn't discriminate between ${BAR} and BAR.
#include
using namespace std;
#define foo(x) x = 3; cout << x << "\n";
int main()
{
int y = 1;
foo(y);
cout << y << endl;
}
Juan
Bill Hoffman wrote:
> Juan Sanchez wrote:
>> I would argue that the following snippet of code shou
Juan Sanchez wrote:
I would argue that the following snippet of code should either print
"CAT" twice or die. Unfortunately it first prints "DOG" and then "CAT".
Thanks,
Juan
MACRO(FOO BAR)
SET (BAR "CAT")
MESSAGE("${BAR}")
ENDMACRO(FOO)
FOO(DOG)
MESSAGE("${BAR}")
So, expand the macr
I would argue that the following snippet of code should either print
"CAT" twice or die. Unfortunately it first prints "DOG" and then "CAT".
Thanks,
Juan
MACRO(FOO BAR)
SET (BAR "CAT")
MESSAGE("${BAR}")
ENDMACRO(FOO)
FOO(DOG)
MESSAGE("${BAR}")
Bill Hoffman wrote:
> Juan Sanchez wrote:
>
Hi,
I am trying to convert my group's existing Visual Studio project to using
CMake to support multiple platform development. For that purpose I am trying
to get Visual Studio solutions and project files to be as similar as
possible to the ones my group is currently using so that the transition
On Friday 21 September 2007 12:29, Christian Buhtz wrote:
> Alexander Neundorf schrieb:
> > cmake does the dependency scanning and rules for rerunning cmake are
> > included in the makefiles.
>
> How do I build my source (with a cmakefile in it) for MinGW on WinXP?
> What is the command for that?
>
Alexander Neundorf schrieb:
cmake does the dependency scanning and rules for rerunning cmake are included
in the makefiles.
How do I build my source (with a cmakefile in it) for MinGW on WinXP?
What is the command for that?
I thougt I have to do something like "cmake generate-my-gcc-makefile
Juan Sanchez wrote:
What I was trying to do was to avoid having to create a local variable.
The macro parameter is the default, which can be overridden if necessary.
Now I immediately have to set a new variable with the value of the
parameter. So I now have to account for another variable bein
Let me try to clarify some terminology.
The source tree is where source files (*.c, etc.) and configuration files
(CMakeList.txt, etc.) live.
The build tree is where you build the software. It contains everything that
is configured or built. It's got a lot of files in it (e.g., *.o) that are
e
What I was trying to do was to avoid having to create a local variable.
The macro parameter is the default, which can be overridden if necessary.
Now I immediately have to set a new variable with the value of the
parameter. So I now have to account for another variable being created
which may th
On 9/21/07, Andrew Maclean wrote:
> Actually I have just begun using version 2.8.5 of wxwidgets. Miguel could
> you please patch it to also use this version? I would thik you just need to
> add wxWidgets-2.8.5 at line 376 before wxWidgets-2.8.4
>
> It would be much appreciated.
This will be added
> I haven't tried but the macro parameters might be immutable themselves
(like
> C++ references :) ) so SET(VARIABLE something) might not be supported
(but
> then again why would you ever need such a thing).
>
I can deal with the restriction as long as its documented.
Unfortunately, I didn't catch
Christian Buhtz wrote:
Mathieu Malaterre schrieb:
CMake is the most similar to Bakefile from these. It generates
semi-native makefiles -- while the makefile is for the native make
tool, it still requires presence of CMake during compilation. Bakefile
has no such requirement.
You mean if I gene
On 9/21/07, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On 9/21/07, Andrew Maclean wrote:
> > Is it worthwhile putting in a backwards compatible fix for such an old
> > version of wxWidgets?
>
>
> This has been broken in patch version ! cmake 2.4.5 / 2.4.6 / 2.4.7
> are completely different in wx support.
> At l
On 21.09.07 14:26:58, Joachim Ziegler wrote:
> Dizzy wrote:
> >So you said you want some package made of some files, but a package means
> >some
> >files that eventually will be on the system in some locations (when the
> >package is installed) so with cmake INSTALL() commands you specify how ar
On Friday 21 September 2007 08:37, Christian Buhtz wrote:
> I ask me why there are so much make-implementations. It is to hard for
> all of us. I know that there couldn't be the one super-make...
That's what cmake is for. Write it once for cmake, which hides all the
differences of the different b
On Friday 21 September 2007 08:34, Christian Buhtz wrote:
> Mathieu Malaterre schrieb:
> > CMake is the most similar to Bakefile from these. It generates
> > semi-native makefiles -- while the makefile is for the native make
> > tool, it still requires presence of CMake during compilation. Bakefile
2007/9/21, Christian Buhtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I ask me why there are so much make-implementations. It is to hard for
> all of us. I know that there couldn't be the one super-make...
There is it is called CMake :=) [just kidding].
> Can CMake read a foreign-makefile (e.g. MinGW-make or nmake)
Hello Dizzy,
Dizzy wrote:
So you said you want some package made of some files, but a package means some
files that eventually will be on the system in some locations (when the
package is installed) so with cmake INSTALL() commands you specify how are
those files to be installed (if the user w
I ask me why there are so much make-implementations. It is to hard for
all of us. I know that there couldn't be the one super-make...
Can CMake read a foreign-makefile (e.g. MinGW-make or nmake) and
generate its own cmake-makefile of it (what is the word for the
cmake-makefile-format?)?
Or c
Mathieu Malaterre schrieb:
CMake is the most similar to Bakefile from these. It generates
semi-native makefiles -- while the makefile is for the native make
tool, it still requires presence of CMake during compilation. Bakefile
has no such requirement.
You mean if I generate a MinGW-makefile (e
On Friday 21 September 2007 04:31, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On 9/20/07, Christian Buhtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What is the difference between cmake and bakefiles?
>
> http://bakefile.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php?n=Bakefile.Comparisons
>
> CMake is the most similar to Bakefile from these
On Friday 21 September 2007 14:55:43 Joachim Ziegler wrote:
> Hello Eric,
I'll drop in and try to answer the questions.
> > 2 - installing your project (i.e. no error when calling 'make
> > install')
>
> This does not. I have no target "install". Browsing through
>
> http://www.cmake.org/HTML/
Hello Eric,
thank you very much for your very quick response. Yes, I am willing to
write some documentation on the Wiki as soon as I have understood the
basic principles of how to make a package.
Eric Noulard wrote:
Write you CMakeLists.txt
make it work for:
1 - compiling your project (i.
2007/9/21, Joachim Ziegler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello list,
>
> I am new to cmake and I have just read the FAQ
>
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ#Distribution_questions
>
> I have also studied the CPack documentation, but I am still wondering
> the following:
>
> > CMake doesn't create a "m
2007/9/7, Eric Noulard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2007/9/7, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I have had some issue with recent CMake version since the wxWidget
> > script broke backward compatibility. AFAIK the find script only works
> > with very recent wxWidget.
> >
> > what is your wxWidge
Hello list,
I am new to cmake and I have just read the FAQ
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ#Distribution_questions
I have also studied the CPack documentation, but I am still wondering
the following:
> CMake doesn't create a "make dist" target.
Does this simply mean that there is no targ
Actually I have just begun using version 2.8.5 of wxwidgets. Miguel could
you please patch it to also use this version? I would thik you just need to
add wxWidgets-2.8.5 at line 376 beforewxWidgets-2.8.4
It would be much appreciated.
Thanks
Andrew
On 9/21/07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAI
On 9/20/07, Christian Buhtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the difference between cmake and bakefiles?
http://bakefile.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php?n=Bakefile.Comparisons
CMake is the most similar to Bakefile from these. It generates
semi-native makefiles -- while the makefile is for the
On 9/21/07, Andrew Maclean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it worthwhile putting in a backwards compatible fix for such an old
> version of wxWidgets?
This has been broken in patch version ! cmake 2.4.5 / 2.4.6 / 2.4.7
are completely different in wx support.
At least put a warning when you deci
On Thursday 20 September 2007 20:38:38 Juan Sanchez wrote:
> It appears that the set command cannot override a variable specified as
> a MACRO argument.
>
> For example:
> MACRO (ADD_GADB RCMD)
>
> does not accept changes to RCMD within the macro using the set command.
> Is there a way to overrid
38 matches
Mail list logo
