On 30.08.07 23:11:27, Alin M Elena wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have tried to generate kdevelop project files for a fortran hello project
> with cmake.
> The result, disaster. (see attach)
What do you mean with disaster? All I can see is that the primary
language element is wrong, which can be easily corr
Hi,
I have tried to generate kdevelop project files for a fortran hello
project with cmake.
The result, disaster. (see attach)
Does anyone intend to add support for fortan project in kdevelop generator?
regards,
Alin
PS I also added the CMakeList.txt.
--
__
Hi,
Around, on the list circulated some versions of FindBLAS, FindLAPACK
modules.
As you support Fortran and performance oriented applications can not
exist without BLAS/LAPACK, I suggest to add these modules to cmake.
The modules depend on a CheckFortranFunctionExists.cmake which is
attached,
Hi again,
I found the answer to my problem in the CMake FAQ. Hurray!
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:19:51AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Reluctantly, I gave up and went back to ADD_CUSTOM_TARGET. The
> following gives me exactly what I want:
[...]
The clue I needed was GET_TARGET_PROPERTY
Gheorghe Postelnicu wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. I forgot to mention in my previous mail
> that I am using CMake 2.4.7 (installed using the installer), but
> although I found mentions of these library names on this mailing list,
> there is no such variable in the version of Fin
I have no idea what cmake 2.4.7 included. Here is the FindBoost.cmake
that I use:
http://titanium.imts.us/viewvc/Task_7/MXADataModel/Resources/
FindBoost-alt.cmake
That is directly from out CVS repository. The code was taken from
another persons FindBoost.cmake and I made some modification
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the suggestion. I forgot to mention in my previous mail
that I am using CMake 2.4.7 (installed using the installer), but
although I found mentions of these library names on this mailing list,
there is no such variable in the version of FindBoost.cmake I have. Is
this normal?
T
Depending on which "FindBoost" you are using, you should be using
something like:
SET(Libraries
ITKIO
ITKCommon
${Boost_Program_Options_Library}
)
Look at the actual file "FindBoost.cmake". Near the top in all the
comments should be the actual variable name that will get filled in
using fo
Hi,
I am trying to use CMake for a project I had configured on Linux until
now and I get link errors with Boost, namely here is my CMakeLists.txt
file:
1. The project built with CMake has C:\Boost\lib in the path
2. in C:\Boost\lib I do have the program_options library, called
boost_program_optio
>> I know this option, but I have very good reasons which makes this
>> option less usefull :)
>> So I would need to change the cmake source code I suppose ?
>>
>Yes, you're right.
>By the way, could you tell us why it is so important to not have any
>CMakeLists.txt ?
>--Sylvain
The thing
On Wednesday 29 August 2007 11:37, Dizzy wrote:
> Hello
>
> Because CVS HEAD seems to be for the 2.6.x release and there is
> the "CMake-2-4" tag for 2.4.x I tried to find out what is the policy of
> changes for 2.6.x and 2.4.x. Basically what is allowed to go into 2.4.x and
Basically only safe fi
On 8/30/07, Torsten Martinsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I, too, use Emacs. However, do not be oblivious to the fact that an
> nmake build can take around five times longer than an IDE build.
why do you use nmake and not msbuild if you do a command
line build? msbuild uses the same mechanism the
I do not have Visual Studio around, but found that on the net:
After saving a file, the add-in kicks in and start replacing carriage
returns and line feeds. If the file is opened in Visual Studio, it
will open a dialog box saying that the file has changed, and will ask
if you want to reload it. Th
gga <> wrote:
> KSpam wrote:
>> I agree that this is a Visual Studio issue; however, I am wondering
>> if anyone knows a workaround. I am not a Windows developer, but I
>> figured that someone on this list would have found a reasonable
>> solution.
>>
>
> Sure. Don't use Visual Studio. Stick
I know this option, but I have very good reasons which makes this
option less usefull :)
So I would need to change the cmake source code I suppose ?
Yes, you're right.
By the way, could you tell us why it is so important to not have any
CMakeLists.txt ?
--Sylvain
__
>From a simple grep in the cmake CVS sources I think that to add such an option
>first would require to have a unified place with the "CMakeLists.txt" string
>value because currently there are about 15 different places in code where the
>string is hardcoded, about 30 places where it appears in m
-Original Message-
From: Sylvain Benner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 8/28/2007 11:03 AM
To: Martin Lütken
Cc: cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] Changing the default name "CMakeLists.txt"
Martin Lütken a écrit :
> Is it possible to change the default the default
> filename
Hello
Because CVS HEAD seems to be for the 2.6.x release and there is
the "CMake-2-4" tag for 2.4.x I tried to find out what is the policy of
changes for 2.6.x and 2.4.x. Basically what is allowed to go into 2.4.x and
what is the todo/roadmap for 2.6.x that once it's done there will be a 2.6.x
Hi,
I'd appreciate some advice for writing test cases using Boost.Test
under windows / msvc.
My first trial was, following the advice of the Boost.Test authors
(http://www.boost.org/libs/test/doc/usage/msvc_net.html), to create a
custom build step in visual studio. This produces output that visu
Hi Alexander,
>> I have no problem creating some test cases however the D compiler module
>> is a bit complicated. It supports two different compilers, and two
>> different standard library sets (which are incompatible with each
>> other). I'm curious how automated testing might work. Would the
On Tuesday 28 August 2007 20:56, you wrote:
> Hey Alexander,
>
> >> Will this patch make it into CVS and eventually an upcoming CMake
> >> release?
> >
> > Done. It will be in cmake 2.6.0.
>
> Excellent! Thanks again for the quick work on this.
>
> >> I'm also curious, what would it take to get th
Hi,
Anyone out there with advice for writing test cases with Boost.Test
under windows / msvc ?
My first trial was, following the advice of the Boost.Test authors
(http://www.boost.org/libs/test/doc/usage/msvc_net.html), to create a
custom build step in visual studio. This produces output that vi
Matthieu,
Thanks for the info! I will forward this off to the Windows guys and ask them
to try it out. I am on vacation for the remainder of the week, so I will let
the list know how this fairs when I return.
Justin
On Wednesday 29 August 2007 01:14:20 Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> I do not hav
The only solution I found is:
use only a subset of the projects in one solution. If you use
my patch (http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=3218) you
are able to open a subproject in your tree and pull only in those
projects that are needed to build the current project.
This way you don't have to c
KSpam wrote:
I agree that this is a Visual Studio issue; however, I am wondering if anyone
knows a workaround. I am not a Windows developer, but I figured that someone
on this list would have found a reasonable solution.
Sure. Don't use Visual Studio. Stick to nmake and a good editor like
25 matches
Mail list logo