Re: [CMake] another name for Qt4 qmake

2007/1/2, Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Matthieu Brucher wrote: > First qmake-qt4 or qmake4, qmake is also used for Qt3, so the > can-confuse qmake should not be searched for first. This should be fixed in the current cmake release. It should do this: 1. look for qmake - if the qmake i

Re: [CMake] CXX_COMPILER_FLAGS also passed to the linker?

On Jan 2, 2007, at 5:08 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote: Mike Jackson wrote: I am using the intel c++ compiler for OS X and I am trying to shutoff some remarks that the compiler kicks out. According to the Intel Docs if I pass "-wd[RemarkNum],[RemarkNum]..." to the compiler I can shutoff what I w

Re: [CMake] CXX_COMPILER_FLAGS also passed to the linker?

Mike Jackson wrote: I am using the intel c++ compiler for OS X and I am trying to shutoff some remarks that the compiler kicks out. According to the Intel Docs if I pass "-wd[RemarkNum],[RemarkNum]..." to the compiler I can shutoff what I want. So I fired up ccmake and set the CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS

Re: [CMake] another name for Qt4 qmake

Bill Hoffman wrote: Matthieu Brucher wrote: First qmake-qt4 or qmake4, qmake is also used for Qt3, so the can-confuse qmake should not be searched for first. This should be fixed in the current cmake release. It should do this: 1. look for qmake - if the qmake it finds is for qt3 then look

Re: [CMake] another name for Qt4 qmake

Matthieu Brucher wrote: First qmake-qt4 or qmake4, qmake is also used for Qt3, so the can-confuse qmake should not be searched for first. This should be fixed in the current cmake release. It should do this: 1. look for qmake - if the qmake it finds is for qt3 then look for qmake-qt4 2. loo

Re: [CMake] another name for Qt4 qmake

First qmake-qt4 or qmake4, qmake is also used for Qt3, so the can-confuse qmake should not be searched for first. Matthieu 2007/1/2, Alexander Neundorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi, it seems on OpenBSD the qmake coming with Qt4 is named "qmake4". So we have now "qmake", "qmake-qt4" and "qmake4". I

[CMake] another name for Qt4 qmake

Hi, it seems on OpenBSD the qmake coming with Qt4 is named "qmake4". So we have now "qmake", "qmake-qt4" and "qmake4". In which order should they be searched ? qmake qmake4 qmake-qt4 ? Bye Alex -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: htt

Re: [CMake] Project using cross compiler

Hi Reinhard, Von: Reinhard Thies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hello, > > I am quiet new to cmake. It looks very nice, at least what I have seen > so far. > I just want to convert some of my projects to cmake. But I have a > question now : > > My project is either running under a ARM or PPC plattform

[CMake] Dashboard utility

Hey, I'm a fairly new to cmake but love it so far :) I tried to setup dart in order to get a nice dashboard of test results (ctest) but didn't have the patience to get it running. I noticed that the resulting xml files from ctest can be sent to a remote destination (using DartConfig.cm

[CMake] CXX_COMPILER_FLAGS also passed to the linker?

I am using the intel c++ compiler for OS X and I am trying to shutoff some remarks that the compiler kicks out. According to the Intel Docs if I pass "-wd[RemarkNum],[RemarkNum]..." to the compiler I can shutoff what I want. So I fired up ccmake and set the CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS to "-wd981" and

[CMake] Project using cross compiler

Hello, I am quiet new to cmake. It looks very nice, at least what I have seen so far. I just want to convert some of my projects to cmake. But I have a question now : My project is either running under a ARM or PPC plattform or directly on my Linux Host. How do I tell cmake to use the cross to

[CMake] OS/390 patches

Hi, Find attached patches to get most of CMake functionality on OS/390 mainframes. Note 1 The curl part is not yet working. Note 2 For some reason I had to patch away the MVS remapping of long external names. Long names work fine for me in USS - Unix System Services. Note 3 The patch is ag

Re: [CMake] FindPerlLibs.cmake and FindSwig.cmake outdated!

On Friday 22 December 2006 00:11, Andreas Schneider wrote: > Axel Roebel wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > Hi Axel, Happy new year everybody! > > obviously you've found a simpler method to achieve the same goal > > and your tests are more complete. It seems to me, however, that it has > > the same weakn