Re: [c-nsp] Cisco distribute-list configs

2016-10-28 Thread Mark Tinka
On 28/Oct/16 19:23, Justin Krejci wrote: > You're position sounds like "I can't think of any reason to use > distribute-lists, therefore everybody should avoid them as there are > newer methods" which doesn't answer the question, is there X, Y, and Z > data that explains why distribute-lists sho

[c-nsp] Cisco Nexus 9396PC - EX verison?

2016-10-28 Thread Nick Cutting
The 9372TX-E and the 9372PX-E have just been replaced with the EX versions that have 100 gig uplinks instead of 40. These generation 2 9k's also have had the buffers bumped up from 29 to 40 meg. Does anyone know if there is a generation 2 revision coming for the 9332PQ or most importantly the 9

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco distribute-list configs

2016-10-28 Thread Justin Krejci
You're position sounds like "I can't think of any reason to use distribute-lists, therefore everybody should avoid them as there are newer methods" which doesn't answer the question, is there X, Y, and Z data that explains why distribute-lists should not be used? Lacking evidence of value is no

Re: [c-nsp] ASR Firmware 15.5(3)S4a

2016-10-28 Thread James Bensley
On 26 October 2016 at 21:56, Pavel Skovajsa wrote: > The only thing I figured out is to use Firefox cliget plug-in for the Cisco > portal, which generates nice curl cli commands that I can then use to > download all those files directly from the internal FTP server. Still, I > have to do it one by

Re: [c-nsp] VRF-Lite between PE

2016-10-28 Thread James Bensley
On 24 October 2016 at 23:09, Maile Halatuituia wrote: > 4. The last bith is that from my scenario now the route injection only happen > if the Primary Link Router in down or link to it is down. However if the > internet link is down i have figure out a way to still inject the route back > to th

Re: [c-nsp] Router memory problem

2016-10-28 Thread Nick Hilliard
Justin Krejci wrote: > We use prefix-lists (not ACL) in our route-maps, BGP filtering, etc > but I am curious what is wrong with distribute-lists specifically. Is > it just that they are old and less efficient CPU-wise or something? > Are there known bugs in certain use cases? distribute lists are

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco distribute-list configs

2016-10-28 Thread Mark Tinka
On 28/Oct/16 01:30, Justin Krejci wrote: > (Starting new thread based on the already deviated branch) > > What about a distribute-list using a prefix-list instead of an ACL? Why create another unnecessary layer? In lieu of using a distribute list that in-turn, references a prefix list, just us