Re: [c-nsp] BFD interval on a CRS3

Hi, On 4 April 2013 14:44, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > Hi Pshem, > What did you use as the FRR mechanism, if any, along with the BFD testing > please? Yes, we did use RSVP-TE FRR for the protection. >> it's threshold based, so once errors reach particular level switchover is >> triggered - whils

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 12000 / SIP 601 / Throughput

Thank Mikeal for your comments, yes right toe 10 GE SPAs have been inserted so i can understand from that 10 G IN / 10 G OUT for my whole SIP ? On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: > > My questions are: >> - shall my SIP work half o

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 12000 / SIP 601 / Throughput

On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: Thank Mikeal for your comments, yes right toe 10 GE SPAs have been inserted so i can understand from that 10 G IN / 10 G OUT for my whole SIP ? Correct, the forwarding engine in the SIP-601 is capable of a total of approximately 11-12 gigabit/s bidirecti

[c-nsp] fabricpath and dual-homed fex

Hi all Can someone give me a hint here. Isn't it possible to have dual-homed fex on nexus5k when you are running fabricpath. The 5K is Layer2 only. I can't find any doc that describes this. /Arne ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net h

Re: [c-nsp] RAD's MiTOP-E3/T3 SFP to ME3600x(-cx) ???

RAD makes both a 100mbps and 1000mbps version of the SFP.. http://www.rad.com/template.MEDIA_ITEM/10286_MiTOP-E3-T3.pdf?skip=true MITOP-E3T3/+/? Legend + PSN interface: FE Fast Ethernet GE Gigabit Ethernet ? Enclosure (Default=regular enclosure): H Temperature-hardened enclosure (MiTOP-E3/T3/FE u

Re: [c-nsp] BFD interval on a CRS3

Hi Pshem, What did you use as the FRR mechanism, if any, along with the BFD testing please? > it's threshold based, so once errors reach particular level switchover is > triggered - whilst BFD has to actually lose those packets first. Well, unless you have the expensive modules that can do the

Re: [c-nsp] RAD's MiTOP-E3/T3 SFP to ME3600x(-cx) ???

Hi, The NIDs are up to couple of $100s, depending on the port configuration. We found them quite reliable but a little fiddly to set up. Luckily in this case the setup is very simple (one vlan for the management of the NID and of the SFP and one for the data traffic). When it comes to clocking - A

Re: [c-nsp] RAD's MiTOP-E3/T3 SFP to ME3600x(-cx) ???

Game on :) Thank you Tim From: Tim Jackson [mailto:jackson@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 2:40 AM To: Adam Vitkovsky Cc: Pshem Kowalczyk; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] RAD's MiTOP-E3/T3 SFP to ME3600x(-cx) ??? RAD makes both a 100mbps and 1000mbps versio

Re: [c-nsp] RAD's MiTOP-E3/T3 SFP to ME3600x(-cx) ???

Hi Saku, >Now it supports 1GE electric interface and I'd need to take a peek again. It they do the 1GE version that would be awesome though the data sheet I found mentioned 100Mbps >I think it's tunneled over IP. The data-sheet I found mentioned MPLS and PW as well > It's essentially SFP form-

Re: [c-nsp] RAD's MiTOP-E3/T3 SFP to ME3600x(-cx) ???

>(they are 100Mb/s SFPs), Aaah you're right these are 100Mbps SFPs -so those won't run on me3600 right? How much is the accidian nid please? And is it reliable please? > In our scenario one end of the PWE3 is always connected to a SDH system that > provides clocking, whilst the other runs in ada

Re: [c-nsp] 10gig Link Bouncing Consistently

Netgear SPF+ transceivers: AXM761 Thanks!! From: Justin Krejci Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 5:56 PM To: Justin M. Streiner; cisco-nsp Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 10gig Link Bouncing Consistently This is what I've got 1. Optics in Cisco are vanilla cisco-comp

Re: [c-nsp] 10gig Link Bouncing Consistently

This is what I've got 1. Optics in Cisco are vanilla cisco-compatible XENPAK-10GB-SR. Optics in the netgear are trying to find out. 2. OM2 fiber 3. Cable length is between 150 and 200 ft. OM2 should be good up to 150 meters @10 gig-e. The fiber is also pretty new, perhaps 2 years old. For a

Re: [c-nsp] 10gig Link Bouncing Consistently

Unfortunately SR/MMF transceivers have no DOM support. We'll definitely get some fiber power meter tests ran during "the problem" time @ 850nm Physical inspection has been completed already as well. No obvious places where there would be any sort of environmental impact and no current signs of

Re: [c-nsp] Performance issue on link

Hi, If I run 1000 pings (1500 byte, df-bit set) in both directions, I am not seeing any packet loss? #tcp window size in the "bad" direction: starts at win=6912 and grows to 165504 (This is where I start to see a heap of TCP Dup ACK and TCP segment of a reassembled PDU)), then increases to 353

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 12000 / SIP 601 / Throughput

On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: My questions are: - shall my SIP work half or full rate ? - full duplex, 10 GE IN / 10 GE OUT ? -SIP 601 will do local forwarding for the traffic ? ( Download coming from UP Link to Backbone ) or should go to RSP ( control plane ) and if this true so the S

Re: [c-nsp] BFD interval on a CRS3

We were told that 20ms is probably the lowest safe value you should run. For those reasons we're moving away from BFD and onto WanPhy and OTU2e encoding on the fibre. I remember testing the actual re-convergence time with BFD (on ASR9k) - with 20ms the actual re-convergence time (measured by a test

Re: [c-nsp] RAD's MiTOP-E3/T3 SFP to ME3600x(-cx) ???

Hi, We have a few of those. We didn't manage to get them going in me3600x (they are 100Mb/s SFPs), so instead we use an accidian nids to provide the SFP port. In our scenario one end of the PWE3 is always connected to a SDH system that provides clocking, whilst the other runs in adaptive mode. The

[c-nsp] Cisco 12000 / SIP 601 / Throughput

Hello Friends, I have 12000 router, i have installed SIP 601 which is supported to 2x XFP 10 GE. I have connect the 1st one to my UP Link and 2nd one to my Backbone. At this SIP, Traffic in will be ( Download from UP Link and Upload from Backbone ) Traffic out will be ( Download to Backbone and U

Re: [c-nsp] RAD's MiTOP-E3/T3 SFP to ME3600x(-cx) ???

Chances are it'll work, but when we asked Cisco about this (they re-sell this for a few situations) they said it had not been tested/approved for the ME3600X.. I can't remember the platform that it was "approved" for by them. The SFPs work "ok" for Pseudowire.. On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:08 AM,

Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000

Yes I'm feel like up'ing to sev2 and getting live hand-off the tac eng recommended trying a different port on asr9k. you think that's what it is ? Aaron From: Aaron [mailto:dudep...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 11:16 AM To: Aaron Cc: Mohacsi Janos; cisco-nsp Subject:

Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000

Have you opened up a case with TAC? On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Aaron wrote: > I tried, still same one-way arp. Also removed the dwdm equipment this > morningnow it's direct fiber and still same one-way arp seen > > Does this look weird that one says "10G-TUNABLE-by-WAVELENGTH" an

Re: [c-nsp] RAD's MiTOP-E3/T3 SFP to ME3600x(-cx) ???

On (2013-04-03 17:08 +0200), Adam Vitkovsky wrote: Hi Adam, > Just found this and I'm confused by the data sheet. It says it can be used > with any SFP port. That would be awesome. I tested them few years ago when they only had 100M model, which I couldn't use as my target platform only accepte

[c-nsp] RAD's MiTOP-E3/T3 SFP to ME3600x(-cx) ???

Hi Folks, Just found this and I'm confused by the data sheet. It says it can be used with any SFP port. That would be awesome. I could understand it only provides structure agnostic service - so whatever enters my port it gets converted to Ethernet and I can bridge the port over to a p2p PW - and

Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000

I tried, still same one-way arp. Also removed the dwdm equipment this morningnow it's direct fiber and still same one-way arp seen Does this look weird that one says "10G-TUNABLE-by-WAVELENGTH" and the other one does not? RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k-1#sh controller dwdm 0/0/0/0 | in Optics

Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000

Yes, lots of times -Original Message- From: Adam Vitkovsky [mailto:adam.vitkov...@swan.sk] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 3:01 AM To: 'Aaron'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000 Hi Aaron, Have you tried to turn it on and off again? :) controller dwdm x/x/

Re: [c-nsp] FQDN ACL's on ASA

Scott, There isn't an explicit permit but there is an explicit drop or deny. What the examples provide are "match not" expressions which are used as explicit "permit". I don't know how complicated your setup needs to be or how many domains or hosts you need to match but "match not" for those wi

[c-nsp] source IP for HSL for NAT64

Hi list, any ideas how to set the source IP address or source interface for High-Speed Logging for NAT64 in Cisco IOS? By default the router exports the netflow data from the outgoing IPv4 interface. Thanks for the feedback! Kind regards, Matjaž _

Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000

Hi Aaron, Can you try configuring the DWDM channel with frequency, instead of channel. We run into a similar problem a while ago. Solution was to configure with frequency. Best Regards, Janos Mohacsi Head of HBONE+ project Network Engineer, Director Network and Multimedia NIIF/HUNGARN

Re: [c-nsp] BFD interval on a CRS3

> on a cisco CRS what is the lowest / shortest BFD interval that can be set It appears that on all XR platforms the lowest BFD interval is 15ms unfortunately. Combined with lowest multiplier of 2 it gives you 30ms detection time. We use multiplier 3 which only leaves 5ms for the IPFRR to do its ma

Re: [c-nsp] 10gig Link Bouncing Consistently

Beginning several days ago both links began flapping every 5 and a half hours, both links have this happen within a couple of minutes of each other. They will flap for several minutes and then return to normal operation requiring no user action and the ports never enter err-disable or show any oth

Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000

Hi Aaron, Have you tried to turn it on and off again? :) controller dwdm x/x/x/x admin-state out-of-service commit ! admin-state in-service commit ! adam -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Tuesda