CTS and ZyXEL both make AE residential FTTH products with individual
ingress/egress rate limiting on all ports. ZyXEL also has DSL products too
though beyond the DSL train rate I am not sure if you can do further rate
limiting on the LAN Ethernet ports or wifi where available.
Also various pack
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 04:31:30PM -0500, Doug McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:19:29PM -0400, Chris Evans wrote:
> > Question for you service provider folks. How do cable modems, dsl, ftth,
> > etc limit bandwidth? I believe that everything is limited at the customer
> > edge demarq d
On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 1:19 PM, Chris Evans wrote:
>
> Question for you service provider folks. How do cable modems, dsl,
> ftth,
> etc limit bandwidth? I believe that everything is limited at the
> customer
> edge demarq device, performing bandwidth limits on a central network
> device
> woul
On 19/06/2012 21:37, sledge...@gmail.com wrote:
> I read a reply from Waris saying that microburst can cause drops when
> traffic arrives from high speed interfaces, he suggested increasing the
> queue-limit to 492 KB, the box only has a total of 44MB for packet
> buffer and I would like to monitor
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:19:29PM -0400, Chris Evans wrote:
> Question for you service provider folks. How do cable modems, dsl, ftth,
> etc limit bandwidth? I believe that everything is limited at the customer
> edge demarq device, performing bandwidth limits on a central network device
> would
I read a reply from Waris saying that microburst can cause drops when traffic
arrives from high speed interfaces, he suggested increasing the queue-limit to
492 KB, the box only has a total of 44MB for packet buffer and I would like to
monitor how much of this total is in use at any one time, is
Question for you service provider folks. How do cable modems, dsl, ftth,
etc limit bandwidth? I believe that everything is limited at the customer
edge demarq device, performing bandwidth limits on a central network device
would be too costly to do.
Do the CE devices use a form of traffic shaping
So if you have something like this
Area3-(R1)Area0(R2)-Area1(R3)-Superbackbone(R4)-
Area2-(R5)--Area3(R6)Area0
Would it be workable to add virtual link to connect area 0 on left side to
sbb via area1.
But this seems strange for the righ
Unfortunately the answer is most likely yes. Is this device a router?
Does it have many routes coming into it from a routing process? Any
spanning tree loops going on.
Before you reboot it, I would try to isolate it from the network so it's
not learning routes. You would hopefully get access ba
Hi all,
Have 3 switches in a stack, have lost telnet and serial connection. The
error message I get when I try to serial connect to the master is %% low
on memory pls try again later. Will only a reboot address this?.
Rgds
Harry
Harry Hambi BEng(Hons) MIET Rsgb
http://www.bbc.co.uk/
This e-m
I have an interface attached to a switch and the router is performing
router-on-a-stick. The subinterfaces on the router are doing q-in-q to
preserve vlans on our core. Is there anything that I need to know to
about getting all traffic ingress on the router to go out the mirror
port? I'm not
Yes they (ES/ES+) are supported on 6500 as of 12.2(33)SXJ1 (No SUP32, just
720-3B and newer) and on 7600 as of 12.2(33)SRD
Though the ES+ XT 20/40 I am unsure if those are compatible with 6500.
- Ed
-Original Message-
From: Matt Addison
Sender: cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.netDate: T
On 19-06-12 16:02, chip wrote:
> add "ibgp policy out enforce-modifications" in the global bgp config
Thanks, that is it! Unfortunately the command name is a little bit
confusing, I was trying to find it, but I was checking the commands
starting with "bgp", no idea why they called it so different.
add "ibgp policy out enforce-modifications" in the global bgp config
and then implement the policy like so:
route-policy RR-IBGP-PEER-OUT($loopback0)
if community matches-every PRESERVE-NEXTHOP then
pass
else
set next-hop $loopback0
endif
end-policy
At least, I think that's what y
You can't use next-hop-self with a route-reflector configuration. You need to
set the next-hop with a route-map.
BGP Next Hop Propagation [Cisco IOS Software Releases 12.2 S] - Cisco Systems
http://lnk4.us/2srD
On Jun 19, 2012, at 5:22 AM, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
>
> I have e
I have encountered a problem configuring route announcements on IOS-XR.
In just a plain IOS (c6500 ie) setting next-hop self at the bgp peer
doesn't affect reflected routes, however it can be overwritten with the
outgoing route-map.
In IOS-XR the route-policy with "set next-hop self" doesn't seem
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 07:36:13AM -0400, Matt Addison wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2012, at 7:23, Gert Doering wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 04:00:21PM -0500, Erik Sundberg wrote:
> >> Does service instance and bridge domains require the ES-20 Cards on the
> >> 6500s?
> >
> > Yes. Or SIP.
>
>
On Jun 19, 2012, at 7:23, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 04:00:21PM -0500, Erik Sundberg wrote:
>> Does service instance and bridge domains require the ES-20 Cards on the
>> 6500s?
>
> Yes. Or SIP.
Are ES cards supported on 6500 now? I thought they were 7600 only as
they
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 04:00:21PM -0500, Erik Sundberg wrote:
> Does service instance and bridge domains require the ES-20 Cards on the 6500s?
Yes. Or SIP.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
> Domain-tag 1 didn't work
Please mind the difference between Domain-tag and Domain-id
Domain-tag -won't help you with the process id discrepancy as it's a loop
prevention mechanism for certain types of LSAs
As you could see later in your trials - Domain-id did the trick -and allowed
you to propaga
Moin Oli,
*Jun 18 2012 12:17:48 CEST: %IPV6_FORWARDING-3-NULLIDB: Uninitialized
interface pointer - ipv6_fib_forw -Process= "L2X Data Daemon", ipl= 0,
pid= 193 -Traceback= 0x8173D634z 0x81096DACz 0x8133B70Cz 0x8133BFF4z
0x8133C050z 0x801F1254z 0x801F1734z 0x801F1960z 0x801F1A94z
0x804E6FC4z
0x
21 matches
Mail list logo
