On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 03:16:46AM -0800, Jonathan Kotker wrote:
> To reiterate, I am constructing a tool that uses CIL in its workflow: my
> (Python) code currently runs the "cilly" driver through a system call. I
> tried the first response that was provided, but I have since realized that
> "conf
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 03:16:46AM -0800, Jonathan Kotker wrote:
> I am basically looking for a way to provide the executable without having
> to include all of the CIL source code, when distributing the tool. If it's
> not possible, I wouldn't mind having the user configure and make the source
>
Hello World.
My apologies for reviving a dead thread, but I wanted to see if anyone else
had to do something similar, and how they approached the problem.
To reiterate, I am constructing a tool that uses CIL in its workflow: my
(Python) code currently runs the "cilly" driver through a system call
run make and you will get an executable of your platform
On Feb 28, 2011 4:08 PM, "Jonathan Kotker"
wrote:
> Hello World.
>
> I am planning to use CIL as part of the research tool that I am writing.
> Currently, my code constructs and runs a system call that runs the cilly
> driver on my local ma
