Re: [CIL users] cil 1.3.7 vs unsigned long long constants

2010-08-20 Thread William Mills
On 08/20/2010 02:02 AM, Gabriel Kerneis wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:03:55PM -0400, William Mills wrote: >> We are updating an old project to 1.3.7 but have run into an issue. >> We are having issues with 64 bit unsigned constants that have the most >> significant bit set. > > Could you plea

Re: [CIL users] cil 1.3.7 vs unsigned long long constants

2010-08-19 Thread Gabriel Kerneis
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:03:55PM -0400, William Mills wrote: > We are updating an old project to 1.3.7 but have run into an issue. > We are having issues with 64 bit unsigned constants that have the most > significant bit set. Could you please try latest svn? I might be wrong but I think this i

[CIL users] cil 1.3.7 vs unsigned long long constants

2010-08-18 Thread William Mills
Hi, We are updating an old project to 1.3.7 but have run into an issue. We are having issues with 64 bit unsigned constants that have the most significant bit set. The simplest program to show the issue is: unsigned long long var1 = 0xFF00ULL; running that through cilly.asm